declined Change MM games to CREATE your own

[georgiaboy_61 46]

It's past time to resign the MM feature of this game. It should be all players control of types of battles created and played. Why did TO want to take that away from the players?

[Spy 14,951]

Declined

One of the main goals of MM is to get players into battles as fast as possible. In order to achieve this goal, the system creates the battles for the players. Even so, you can still create your own PRO Battles, in which you can also change the settings to your liking.

[wolverine848 13,097]

3 minutes ago, Spy said:

Declined

One of the main goals of MM is to get players into battles as fast as possible. In order to achieve this goal, the system creates the battles for the players. Even so, you can still create your own PRO Battles, in which you can also change the settings to your liking.

MM sux.

Have you SEEN all the completely unbalanced games these days.

Fix it or you wont have a player base to run the game on.

[Spy 14,951]

3 minutes ago, wolverine848 said:

MM sux.

Have you SEEN all the completely unbalanced games these days.

Fix it or you wont have a player base to run the game on.

1) Completely irrelevant to the topic. His idea is about being able to create your own MM battles, which is, as I explained above, impossible.

2) You say "fix it" as if I am a developer or anything of this sort. All I can do is pass players' feedback, which is something I already do.

[wolverine848 13,097]

19 minutes ago, Spy said:

1) Completely irrelevant to the topic. His idea is about being able to create your own MM battles, which is, as I explained above, impossible.

2) You say "fix it" as if I am a developer or anything of this sort. All I can do is pass players' feedback, which is something I already do.

"you" as in the company you work for.  Obviously "you" can't do anything about it.

But we wonder sometimes, how much of our feedback is filtered before it gets to Devs, IF it does make it.

We wonder because...

- so many of the helpers give thumbs up - to even the most head-shaking updates

- and because the changes implemented, for the most part, are pi$$ing off a lot of players and the base keeps shrinking.

 

[Spy 14,951]

4 minutes ago, wolverine848 said:

"you" as in the company you work for.  Obviously "you" can't do anything about it.

To begin with, I don't work for any company. Helpers and administrators are volunteers.

6 minutes ago, wolverine848 said:

But we wonder sometimes, how much of our feedback is filtered before it gets to Devs, IF it does make it.

In most of the cases it's being sent as is, no changes are made.

7 minutes ago, wolverine848 said:

We wonder because...

- so many of the helpers give thumbs up - to even the most head-shaking updates

- and because the changes implemented, for the most part, are pi$$ing off a lot of players and the base keeps shrinking.

I do agree that some helpers just leave comments just for the sake of it, I will try doing something about it.

Unfortunately after passing the feedback to the developers, the decisions they make are up to them and we cannot do much.

[alkyng 3,081]

On 1/28/2022 at 5:17 PM, georgiaboy_61 said:

It's past time to resign the MM feature of this game. It should be all players control of types of battles created and played. Why did TO want to take that away from the players?

This is far from being accepted. Though I agree and I personally think it's better for the game even if I was a developer.  Because the game handled more than 30K players in 2014-2016 with PRO battles system. Why I said this, is because many assumes that game can't handle much players without MM.  One of pro battles problems was the mission exploitation, though it was happen alot and I was one of them, but I don't think it's really huge problem that can have many solutions to restrict it at least.

[XD_PRO 88]

the mm is fine..i also didnot like it very much ..but i think its balanced.. you can easily get kills if u have a max turent n double damage..what players want nowdays it that tanki developers should give everyone max 9999 without any effort..see any game even PUBG (M) and also PC version ..the more you play the more u get better.

 

[YANUKFIN 493]

32 minutes ago, XD_PRO said:

what players want nowdays it that tanki developers should give everyone max 9999 without any effort

They already do this for certain players, i use the word player in very loose terms.

 

14 hours ago, Spy said:

To begin with, I don't work for any company. Helpers and administrators are volunteers.

In most of the cases it's being sent as is, no changes are made.

I do agree that some helpers just leave comments just for the sake of it, I will try doing something about it.

Unfortunately after passing the feedback to the developers, the decisions they make are up to them and we cannot do much.

Why was MY post taken down?

[Spy 14,951]

3 hours ago, YANUKFIN said:

Why was MY post taken down?

Because your post was irrelevant to this topic, I replied to wolverine in order make my point clear but this is not the place for this discussion. You can PM me or use the correct topic(s).

[georgiaboy_61 46]

On 1/30/2022 at 3:46 PM, Spy said:

Declined

One of the main goals of MM is to get players into battles as fast as possible. In order to achieve this goal, the system creates the battles for the players. Even so, you can still create your own PRO Battles, in which you can also change the settings to your liking.

Well let the player CREATED(PRO) battles count like MM towards missions and special events.

[Spy 14,951]

8 hours ago, georgiaboy_61 said:

Well let the player CREATED(PRO) battles count like MM towards missions and special events.

It will be way too easy to finish missions this way.

[alkyng 3,081]

3 hours ago, Spy said:

It will be way too easy to finish missions this way.

The only mission that can be easily finished is be in TOP 3.  You create 1vs1 battle, and you have a 50% chance to win, rather than the 3/20 chance in regular battles.  Other than that I see other missions are just a waste of time if you tried to finish them with a group of people or something like, they're way easier to finish them by regular playing.

[Spy 14,951]

25 minutes ago, asem.harbi said:

The only mission that can be easily finished is be in TOP 3.  You create 1vs1 battle, and you have a 50% chance to win, rather than the 3/20 chance in regular battles.  Other than that I see other missions are just a waste of time if you tried to finish them with a group of people or something like, they're way easier to finish them by regular playing.

Incorrect. Here is a list for you;

• Pick up/use supplies missions.
• Finish battles in any mode.
• Finish Battles in [ Team deathmatch / Capture the flag / Control points / Assault / Rugby / Juggernaut / Siege ].
• Use overdrives.

[alkyng 3,081]

32 minutes ago, Spy said:

Incorrect. Here is a list for you;

• Pick up/use supplies missions.
• Finish battles in any mode.
• Finish Battles in [ Team deathmatch / Capture the flag / Control points / Assault / Rugby / Juggernaut / Siege ].
• Use overdrives.

True - I haven't think about them. But the first mission is mostly just requires 15 of supplies, which is not alot nowadays, except in festive seasons which require 300+ of them.

The second and third missions are repeated, but true it can be easily abused.  And the fourth mission, No, if you mean by collecting OD boxes, they're a waste of time, not a huge difference to play for hours to use 200 ODs with no goal of playing. Let's assume you and another one trying to finish it (missions wasn't counted for a battle you alone in it), so one OD box for you and one for him? More wasting of time.

Also one point you forgot (and I'm), Capture the flag/ball missions.

Off-topic :

Second and third mission can be easily patched by requiring the amount of time to be 10m+. And the capturing missions can be fixed by requiring the number of players to be more than 5x5. Also some missions abusing happen in MM FYI, when enemy team leave, your team can easily capture 7 flags.

Edit: Also ones who play are more likely to finish their missions, and ones who leave the game for a while will more likely not joining to finish their missions even if by abusing. So both (abusers and regulars) are successing the same goal, playing everyday for 1 hour +.

[yellowghetto 3,206]

8 hours ago, Spy said:

It will be way too easy to finish missions this way.

Yep. I remember when I was a Warrant Officer - Major, I did something called "power-leveling."

I used to create Ping-Pong or Island matches with my friends to complete missions quickly and kill each other to rank up fast. Very abusive.

[alkyng 3,081]

24 minutes ago, yellowghetto said:

Yep. I remember when I was a Warrant Officer - Major, I did something called "power-leveling."

I used to create Ping-Pong or Island matches with my friends to complete missions quickly and kill each other to rank up fast. Very abusive.

You can't disagree with me in every post.  I hope you specify specifically which missions you mean you can complete quickly in Ping-Pong.

[Spy 14,951]

23 minutes ago, yellowghetto said:

Yep. I remember when I was a Warrant Officer - Major, I did something called "power-leveling."

I used to create Ping-Pong or Island matches with my friends to complete missions quickly and kill each other to rank up fast. Very abusive.

Exactly. This is why missions cannot be completed in PRO Battles anymore. PRO Battles are used for testing/training for the actual battles which are held in MM.

[alkyng 3,081]

1 minute ago, Spy said:

Exactly. This is why missions cannot be completed in PRO Battles anymore. PRO Battles are used for testing/training for the actual battles which are held in MM.

Wrong, PRO battles used to be for actual playing. You have to say "have changed" instead of "are used".  Also the reason of PRO battle restrictions is not just for missions, but for many cumulative reasons. Like they don't want battles be in a mess everyone create battles in a settings he want - Easily being placed in battles - Battles will be always full - etc.. .

[yellowghetto 3,206]

9 minutes ago, asem.harbi said:

You can't disagree with me in every post.  I hope you specify specifically which missions you mean you can complete quickly in Ping-Pong.

You can check the Wiki for that.

[Spy 14,951]

On 2/1/2022 at 6:43 PM, asem.harbi said:

Wrong, PRO battles used to be for actual playing. You have to say "have changed" instead of "are used". 

No, it's not. Developers' words, not mine.