Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Rico or Thunder?


 Share

Recommended Posts

Lol lets pretend that I have both of them tell me which one you think that I should use and why.

The reason i did not make this a poll is so that you have to give why and and what, in a poll you can just vote and not give reason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rico and thunder is pritty the same for me btw thunder m3 is stronger tho so i vote for both :P

my friend has thunder and pwns me -.-

 

rico

 

wow finnely i saw a consultant on the english forum why arent any consultans for english only russian :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rico for its ability to be good at most maps, flexible gameplay and you'll be doing some close range at most maps

 

 

P.S. Hornet sucks, get an alt. armor so you can have a backup

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thunder is better for camping, long-range sniping, and the splash is devastation.

 

Ricochet is better for closer-quarter combat, sieging, and patrol.

 

You should not equip either of these on Hornet; I recommend Viking or Mammoth, depending on the salary of your tankmen. 8)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All you people who says Hornet sucks with Rico and Thunder.

 

Have you played it with hornet? Have you really played it at a pro level?

I don't know about thunder, but I've played with hornet Rico quite well, I've actually beaten M3 viking rico spark 1 on 1 without any assistance, you keep shooting him while backing up, your bullets will knock his tank a bit and when backing up it makes your tank smaller and with hornets small size it makes it easy. Sometimes you can dodge many Rico shots or get behind buildings faster while using the bullets to hit your opponents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...