This game is getting worse!

[Thunder.Crash 4]

Yes, that's right :x even a WO5 or a 3rd lieutenant has expensive tanks, paints and weapons. Obviously, they purchase and drugs. What about the players those who cant buy? They don't stand a chance against them although they are higher in rank. This game is still free, and i want it this way to earn by playing, not just buying

[Vincent077 3]

Don't be such a control freak! It's people's decision! They can buy if they want, it just shows their honour to this game by spending money on it! I think it is really nice to do that, because it shows that you enjoy the game so much you spend money on it! If there are buyers in the battle, don't cry about it, just do your best, or go into another battle. GOD!! what is with these people who cry about buyers >.

[r_Clue1 4]

What if there's a buyer in every battle?

[Vincent077 3]

Just do with it! who cares! It's not up to you protesters to stop all buying, just because you can't buy, doesn't mean you have to put everyone off. Either buy some for yourself, or just do with it. I'm sure there would be SOME battles without buyers, just FIND them.

[Thunder.Crash 4]

Do u know where the problem is? We were winning the game 42//4 flags out of 50, and then.. bang! Low ranks came, with m3 mammoths, viking rico and freeze. They were not above 1st lieutenant. One by one, and then u know what happened.. Colonels in my team could not do anything. LOL

[CrystalManX87 0]

I gotta support Vinny, stop sulking it's just one game.

[r_Clue1 4]

Just do with it! who cares! It's not up to you protesters to stop all buying' date=' just because you can't buy, doesn't mean you have to put everyone off. Either buy some for yourself, or just do with it. I'm sure there would be SOME battles without buyers, just FIND them.[/quote']

 

Oh my GOD you don't have to use CAPS LOCK all the time and so many EXCLAMATION MARKS because it looks like you're SHOUTING which isn't good for A conversation!

 

Sorry, just had to get that across. :oops: :mrgreen:

 

 

Anyway, buyers have a big advantage over someone their rank who doesn't buy. Paints, top upgrades, drugs galore! And if there's two or three of 'em against you, you're pretty much dead (unless you have buyers of your own, and then you still can't do anything). Of course, you can get an m3m3 set if you focus on a single pair of weapons, play huge battles, referalls, contests, bla bla bla... But most casual gamers, which is also most of the gamers, aren't willing to sit 12 hours non-stop to be able to stop someone who bought those weapons in five minutes.

 

Now, you say, "DEAL with IT LEAVE the battle!! There's got to be SOME battles without buyers!" which is a stupid argument. If's something is broken, you should fix it, not say deal with it, because you will still have to confront the problem time and time again until even the most patient people are annoyed. I propose allowing someone to regulate not only ranks in a battle, but also modifications of weaponry; for example, have a game be up to, say, WO5, and you can have m3 of the first tier but only m2 of the second. Buyers can still create battles themselves with high modifications, so everyone is (hopefully) happy.

[Longcat970 119]

dude dont whine...im a buyer myself what did i getfrom my friends?? they insult me so its also hard bein a buyer... oh btw back to topic without buyers to help keep tanki's servers on 1 by 1 servers wud shut down and then 1 last server...bam tanki's done.

[GENERATOR2142 17]

I have only bougth twice with Sms and i still got great stuff :mrgreen:

[MonkeyMagic 89]

I propose allowing someone to regulate not only ranks in a battle, but also modifications of weaponry; for example, have a game be up to, say, WO5, and you can have m3 of the first tier but only m2 of the second. Buyers can still create battles themselves with high modifications, so everyone is (hopefully) happy.

 

thats actually a good idea. would also help when people want to play a single type of game too, say - rail guns only, etc.

 

not sure about the 'M' selection part of it, seems a bit messy. but weapon and turret battle selection sounds good.

[RiseOfCucumber 651]

So you hate this game only because of buyer?

[Pi5T0L 1]

Don't be such a control freak! It's people's decision! They can buy if they want' date=' it just shows their honour to this game by spending money on it! I think it is really nice to do that, because it shows that you enjoy the game so much you spend money on it! If there are buyers in the battle, don't cry about it, just do your best, or go into another battle. GOD!! what is with these people who cry about buyers >.<[/quote']+1

[CrystalManX87 0]

Its not buyers I hate its DRUGGERS. especially with this stupid event

[r_Clue1 4]

I propose allowing someone to regulate not only ranks in a battle, but also modifications of weaponry; for example, have a game be up to, say, WO5, and you can have m3 of the first tier but only m2 of the second. Buyers can still create battles themselves with high modifications, so everyone is (hopefully) happy.

 

thats actually a good idea. would also help when people want to play a single type of game too, say - rail guns only, etc.

 

not sure about the 'M' selection part of it, seems a bit messy. but weapon and turret battle selection sounds good.

 

 

Thanks; you're right, M's might be a step too far, but weapons certainly could come in handy.

[Mizz33 0]

Buyers keep the game going, but yet kill all of us. So look at it this way, you can either not have Tankionline at all, or have a Tankionline that deals with jacked up players.

 

 

I'd choose the latter. I also agree with adding a feature that somehow separates buyers from non-buyers.

[Tommy60 406]

It has already been determined that in 2.0, battle-makers can choose which, weapons, tanks, and paints will be allowed in specific battles. Along with no-supplies battles, this should be able to satisfy a lot of people.

 

 

However, I'm not sure if there is an option to allow only a certain type of modification(s) of tank or weapon into a battle. =/

[The_Ice_Dragon 22]

Suck it up. You lose some. You win some.

 

You can't get everything you want.

[Vincent077 3]

Exactly.

[Thunder.Crash 4]

Don't hate me buyers, i respect everyone :p it's true that, they are funding this game servers and the staffs. Well, i dislike them among in low ranks. They ruin a good game for general players, and we all see them gathering in the "golden spot" when a battle prize reaches at 700(x)... :mrgreen: