Hall Of Technical Shame

[FogOfWar_XXX 793]

Offender candidate profiles:

@xXPaulWalkerXx

 

Hall of Technical Shame

 

Welcome to the Tanki Hall of Shame, where the most offensive players, in terms of drug use and poor sportsmanship, will be called out and simply identified for their lack of character, decency, and total disregard for the spirit of good game play.

 

Offenders

 

 

 

Rules and Notes

 

 

Rules:

 

1. DPH must have a threshold of at least 12 drug units per hour spent playing in non parkour environs.

2. No overtly inflammatory comments about voted players and candidates in this forum.  (Take it elsewhere if need be, this is a the formal venue for listing them)

3. No vendettas and no sob stories, this is DPH, Kits, and Skills only arguments.  (Show us the money shot, a screen cap, and a link to the profile for verification of candidacy)

4. No calling people out for “trash talk”.  One thing is to be crassly offensive to other players, another is to simply haze and make light of others in the heat of battle.

5. No resubmitting the same offenders within thirty days of a prior winning poll.  (Candidates not selected can be resubmitted any number of times)

 

Common sense.  If someone is border line, then don’t submit them.  There are enough heavy offenders to keep this forum alive for a VERY long time with introducing questionable people that just made you angry once.

 

People who are voted into the list can whine all they want, parkour will not be an acceptable excuse.  No one will complain about you in real battles if you only drug parkour, or have a swarthy mouth for no good reason.

 

People who are voted onto the list SHOULD go complain to mods if they are hurt.  We will invite everyone to come see the list, in fact, it’s our very purpose of this thread.  We want to expose the inequalities of the worst of the offenders for the sake of reasonable change in Tanki that does NOT remove revenue streams but creates a balance again for all players.  Nothing speaks louder than words accompanied by words.  This is our effort to remind Tanki that this is in fact important and cannot be ignored.

 

 

 

 

[I3ANNED 1,693]

Please do not create topics about specific players to disgrace them or for others to get a bad idea about them.

[r_GaIaxy2 8,611]

Offender of the Week? Where is your name?

 

May wanna read the rules before making topics

[Phoenix.Raised 5,992]

There are also some other rules and you forgot them: Rules

[FogOfWar_XXX 793]

Please do not create topics about specific players to disgrace them or for others to get a bad idea about them.

Wow, that didn't that long.  Did you NOT read what the rules were?  You don't have to come here and read it if you don't like it.  This isn't a popularity contest or a bid to bully people.  This is a REAL effort to isolate and point out some real issues in this game using REAL DATA and VOTES, not a popularity contest.  If I don't a submission for a particular week that meets the criteria, THE TECHNICAL CRITERIA, they are not getting added to the poll vote, I HAVE RULES, SO READ THEM.

[FogOfWar_XXX 793]

Offender of the Week? Where is your name?

 

May wanna read the rules before making topics

I did read the rules, and at no point am I calling others out based upon a SUBJECTIVE NATURE.  The offense is clearly stated, anyone can be, or not be, within the parameters of the rules 12 DPH and idenfied in NON PARKOUR battles, and the addtional criteria of kit based equipment otherwise classed outside of their rank.  Either you fall into the technical category or you don't.

 

You tell me, what part of the rules did I break?  I am not singling ANYONE out based upon their person, their nature, their ethnicity, religion, etc.  These are . . .

 

ALL IN GAME STATS, EVERY SINGLE LAST ONE.

[The-Operator219 1,929]

Well, I hate to go against this but...

Why can't they be anonymous members? If it's purely the statistics, then the users shouldn't matter.

Besides, the last thing we need to deal with are butthurt folks.

[KrystenHunt16 128]

I love how quickly people jumped on him for posting this topic.

 

Nobody's being singled out due to race, gender, sexuality, age, ethnicity, etc. If you read the rules (which I did ;)) you'll see that this topic is merely a place to list the people with the highest in-game statistics. This breaks a cumulative amount of zero Tanki Online rules.

[The-Operator219 1,929]

I didn't jump, I suggested making the members anonymous but listing the stats.

[FogOfWar_XXX 793]

Well, I hate to go against this but...

Why can't they be anonymous members? If it's purely the statistics, then the users shouldn't matter.

Besides, the last thing we need to deal with are butthurt folks.

That would be somehow maybe usable if the nature of the information would be meaningful.  Without identifying the account that has the criteria met, anyone can claim that I'm pulling this out of thin air, and it just becomes a numbers game, us sitting around posting anon stats that mean nothing to no one.

 

The more I think on it though, it might be an effective benchmark though, huh?  How do we query the profiles based upon supply usage?  That's the real trick to even beginning instantiating this idea of yours, which frankly might be actually a useful tool in making the point.

[Fruit 6,570]

Topics about specific players are not allowed.

 

 

Closed.