Who would you suggest for this 1 good dictator? There is not one single person on this world who would be a great dictator. The power would make him have $_$ and he'd buy himself big houses and stuff. Anyway, the solution might be good, but believe me.. if I am discussing this so much with you, the rest of the world would as well. You won't change their mindset. Ever. Olympics won't be stopped either. Simply because too many people like it for it to be to stopped.

I guess that would be a solution. But practically it is impossible to do this. As I said before it means the world has to be changed completely. That's impossible, especially since you want to limit the powerful people, and powerful people will use their power not to be limited. Wars resulting. That's what's happening at this moment right? Because then this prooves to be a failure.

But this means you are transfering the problem. Before people couldn't get their money spent organized, now they can't spend their bread organized, which means they eat their monthly amount of bread in a week, causing them to be hungry and unhappy. There is no way (invented yet) to solve this problem. It's human tendency to do such things, and changing the mindset of the complete earth is impossible. People will get more power if they want, and people will take as much money/bread as they can. The world is not perfect, and I think we have got to deal with it.

I don't see why it should be. As long as you have a friendly nice discussion about an appropriate subject, I don't see why it should be closed. Would be sad if that happens.

Anddd... this is exactly what happens in our current (capitalist) society. If you work hard, for example by studying, getting many many degrees and do some high-educated job, you receive more money than someone who is too lazy to study. Nowadays we call that 'A banknote'. So then the lazy guy steps in and does nothing at all, has no children, no job etc. What is he gonna get? Nothing? That means we've got 1 new homeless guy. Communism is not the answer to our problem, neither is removing money. Disabled people would have no life still then. Don't worry, as long as this discussion stays serious and friendly nothing is gonna happen, otherwise we simply edit the title and add '+Communism-capitalism discussion'.

If you consider the Sovjet-Union communist, the north-korea is as well. Whether it's truly communist I can't tell. There isn't really any truly communist country in the world. But I think communism is not what we want nowadays. Considering the past it has had. The reason those leaders in the past did that because the communism gave him the oppurtunity to become a dictator, and it pretty much is in human nature to grab more power when a human can.

Then why tend countries with communism to be harmful and dangerous? We have seen it in the past, but nowadays it still causes problems. Or isn't that the communism what causes countries to be harmful? Also, I'd suggest not to close this topic by request, we still have a discussion going on.

Very nice from you to think like that. But homeless people have a mindset that doesn't always allow help. I have seen a social experiment on youtube where homeless were offered a job, and they all denied it. They could start a life out there. Now here is the deal: Homeless earn more money by begging, I just googled and saw €250,- a day. When a homeless would have a job, they'd never earn so much money, as they most likely are not doing any highly educated job. I cannot reject that there are homeless who like to live on the streets, but nowadays there are so many things that can help you reaching a better position. I think there should be invested in homeless, but I don't think it means that we all have to change our lifes for it. If you 'd really really want to help homeless you can also take them home, give them some food and let them stay for the night on the couch or a bed in a spare room, have you already done that? Yes, the BBC is not always correct. Media cannot always be trusted.If you want to make sure, you got to check it out yourself. It's more reliable to hear such a thing from a different source than from the government itself about the government.

Danku danku :)

Ohhh jammer :( Raadt eens wie er wel terug is :lol:

I see sometimes vulcans that hit me but don't damage me.. when they shoot again they damage me, is that a bug? second.. http://prntscr.com/60623p we were standing against each others and we both had vulcans, I'd say it's impossible to kill each other like it's possible with rico, right?

.

Well.. If I would be back I would re-apply for a job here. I just play now and then, but not actively.. :p

:lol: lolol, nieuwe avatar? Als consultant hou je altijd je consultant avatar toch?

The idea behind it is good, but it kills a lot. I have friends lower ranked than Major. We have to create new accounts to be able to play together now. I don't think that is what we should do... Also, I did talk with people in the lobby, since we cannot have big talks there anymore it sometimes goes into battles, impossible now.. Sad thing. I read someone saying that clans need to go through changes now to be able to play with a full squad.. some clans have ranks ranging from wo5 till generallisimo. Was this considered while creating this? When I take a random clan in M2 clans (http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=240687) you see that this clan can close then. It will not be able to put a normal battle on the battlefield. I think it's good for battles! But I also think that updates are too focused on the game, and not on other aspects like friends, clans etc.

So did I when I was checking if this video was good for the forum :p but fakkel means torch :D

Spongebob fun song English and Dutch :wub: Dutch voices are so much better, but I grew up with those voices.. :p

Uhhh.... I only watched the Dutch Spongebob, unless you want a dutch quote I can't give you any :/

This is nothing different than anytime else we had an update, players leaving blablabla, many will come back of course

For me, XP-ruiners are the ones who are having a difference combination equiped, something which is NOT against the rules! It is not appreciated, indeed, but not forbidden. It is not a matter if selfishness, this kid from 8 who plays the game for pure fun, how can you ever ever ever blame him for playing not so well as you and your team plays, he has no idea, he is playing, leave him playing.

Not that single player obviously, he is playing by the rules, and enjoying the game, why would he be blamed for having fun for himself?

Yes, but how can you ever blame some else for playing bad, in a game, which is supposed to be for fun??

Look at the difference you're scetching. 1. Playing for fun, or just because you want to play a game. These guys are simply enjoying their playing 2. Playing for victory. Clanplayers for example. They want to win, and when they lose, they're mad or disappointed. You are also a ''player for fun'', look here below. Asking a player for fun to leave, makes no sense for him, and he won't leave. That doesn't make him a noob or whatever you wish to call him.

This and all the stuff you said before on this topic sound extremely arrogant to me. No wonder that you pown with your M0 or M1 combi on low rank, you have more experience playing after all. You cannot compare yourself. Skills comes with experience. Usually, the more you play, the more skill you get, usually! But 'noob' is a very subjective word. When I say noob to someone, it doesn't mean that he is noob, it means that he is worse than me, in my opinion! When someone is worse than you, and you tell him noob, you think that he is worse than you.