I want Twins-Hunter nao..But new turrets and the fact I'm far more acquainted w/ Thunder...

What if Wasp got a speed buff..owait then it'd be OP nvm nvm...

^Lolwut if that happens with Wasp so often I highly doubt using Hornet does much better.

^magnum was the first "confirmed" name. Hammer is a far more appropriate name and if it works well will use :D

hornet should be changed imo its an inferior wasp.

how did your spacebar not break for the amount of time a brick was propped on spacebar? :P

I WANT M2 Hunter :_; So cloose

All I ever said was "lol Viking hurpdurp" until I realized several people bought the Hull Kit and had M2 Viking before the required rank..

Hunter (and Thunder) powah. I don't need no hornet for Monte Carlo. our team won, was a CTF http://oi60.tinypic.com/2rfy8aa.jpg

@fufususumumu1: Ricochet having an autoaim of over 90 degrees? nonsense. I have never seen a single ricochet autoaim past about 50 degrees or so.

M1 Thunder-Hunter in a Monte Carlo CTF. Sadly my team was quite bad and let 3 easily preventable flags though, but we won 6-5. http://oi60.tinypic.com/2rfy8aa.jpg

omg that D/L is overpowered and unfair. seriously now we have two people showing how op rico is...haha jk. even I have to admit that D/L is piddling for any turret.

This is at the M0-M1 level, I won't judge the m2-m4 level b/c I don't really have a say in it. Although I hope you're right

There's ways to minimize splash damage to yourself, such as using mines. :P

Railgun is "everyone's" "favorite turret". XP/BP is the "only" "correct way" to use it. (It's not a half bad weapon, just heavily overused)

"pure f2p" doesn't really matter does it

Owait I forgot we play against totally different ranks lol. Make an alt its horrid though

M2 Hunter b)

Hunter-Firebird/Thunder.

M4 Wasp, M4 Hunter, M4 Firebird, M4 Thunder, and maybe one of the new turrets M4. Prodigi, Emerald, and Picasso will be mah paints, all fully MUed.

M4 hunter has the speed of M0 wasp therefor making hunter superior. :P

@Stinger911: Do I have to be a master chef to say that a meal is terrible, just like "do I have to be a rico user to criticize ricochet?" If you see you friend eat a meal, gag it out a few seconds later then run to the bathroom, are you going to eat that meal for your pleasure? Likewise, if I see noobs with ricochet with extremely poor gameplay (They don't even know how to get m1s or where the Z and X keys are) get D/Ls somewhere around 1.5 and have one of the top scores in an M1 battle, why should I be convinced that Ricochet is "balanced"?

Then why the large rank barriers?

It's the Wasp, not the turret.

Chameleos: seeing other people eat it, smelling it, looking at it. (mainly the first one) If I see plenty of noobs using Ricochet improperly and getting D/Ls over 1, and near top score on their team, why shouldn't I say Ricochet is somewhat overpowered? Thunder got a damage nerf in update 207 b/c people said Thunder was too damaging. (This was WAY before I actually used Thunder) If I occasoinally get hit by a railgun autoaim at 90 degrees, wouldn't I say the autoaim is overpowering? And yes, I have tried using it in battle a few times to see what's so special about it: It's literally everything I expected, and I tried to act like a total noob whilst doing it. - Damage is insane (I either crippled the enemy heavily or killed them easily simply by charging them and sitting on the spacebar) - you die so often clip size rarely matters - Ricochet feature is meant to be pratical, and imo it should be rewarded. (I saw some really lucky shots from normal rico noobs who missed me by a mile then it hit me in the back) If you see a friend eat something then he gags it out a few seconds later, and goes to the bathroom, are you going to try to eat that meal for your own pleasure?