I have used both, so I would know more. Both have the same level of difficulty Beginner artists, shouldn't try animations. They are way to difficult

Good Luck :)

Gimp can also make gifs. And Noob armies logo is very hard to make, I doubt that you can make one like it

deleted

I have notified the mods of your disrespectful /offensive behavior, please be sure to thank me for your ban. This is portuguese, and the english community allows all languages other than russian and german.

You expect us to read backward?

^Too bad I was offline :(

It is not bad, but repeating the same techniques, same design concepts will get you no where as an artist Try experimenting, using and learning new concepts and techniques

Pm Archangel

You sure do love smoke...

Better player? Pleasssee. He has an anti-freeze paint+m3 freeze+ m2 hornet The other player had very Small protection paint, m1 mammoth and m2 freeze. m1 vs m3, its obvious who is gonna win

He said that his opponent has mammouth m1 and freeze m2. A duel is played with the same combos. This is not a duel. So the record is invalid

Some Where on a remote Island; The missing Malaysian airplane is doing this

STop making stupid+ useless topics

1. I don't know why people use number symbols, other than the fact that they use them 2. The guidelines for banning people based on name is in the rules 3. I am not saying that lower ranks shouldn't be blocked for bad names. In fact the only problem is with your first point, the aids one, and the fact that "88" is a bannable name.

No, it just affects english. And why don't we also ban the player "188" All heil ------

Yes, and so we might as ban the player "44" Because 4 means death in chinese. ALso lets ban the player "13", because its unlucky This is not fair, almosts everyones name has an implied bad meaning in some random language. Why not ban us all?

IMO It is most likely a random player who could speak all 3 languages (english, russian and german). I don't think that semyon can speak german...

This topic is beyond you now, I wish it to stay open

1. This is the way I see things. A death of an innocent can be justified if his/hers deaths saves the life of another innocent person. 2. It matters not. They must uphold their terms. Take away funding for the war, or better yet, instead of hacking at each other with swords, just write a treaty 3. Once again, I am not saying that their deaths were deserved, simply that it was an unintended loss life. And don't you think that the people who wrote the books and videos know about this? They know that there were innocent settler deaths, but the society that suffered the most BY FAR are the natives.

1. Ok 2. When I researched this: In 1851, the Santee Sioux Indians of Minnesota had been forced to cede to the government their hunting ground of 24,000,000 acres (97,000 km2). In 1852, they were corralled into a reservation on the Minnesota River. In 1858, they were swindled of half that land. In August 1862, when the government failed to pay the $1.4 million compensation provided by treaty, and its agents and politicians stole most of the supplies that the treaty granted, the Indians rebelled. When Chief Little Crow complained that despite stacks of provisions in clear sight, supposedly theirs by treaty, his people had nothing to eat, the government agent responded, "So far as I'm concerned... let them eat grass or their own dung. Minnesota political leaders, led by Governor Alexander Ramsey, in league with commercial interests, advocated expelling all Indians from Minnesota. This is more than enough justification to attack. 3. The deaths of innocent settlers was collateral damage.

1. Some times? More like every single piece of land was taken. The Natives once ruled all of North America. They were forced off their home lands and on to reserves. Only the explorers who discovered North America were fair to its people. The settlers were not. 2. Their fault? They were forced on those condition by our actions. As to the casinos thing, I suggest that the google the lifestyles of most aboriginals. It is not pretty 3. The indians did what they did, in order to protect their homeland. If that involved killing the INVADERS, so be it. 4. It does not matter whether the diseases were intentional or not. They came to north america because of the settlers, and so therefor they are responsible for the consequences of their actions.

What about the diseases that the settlers brought? They wiped out 90% of the native population. In every way that you look at it, the settlers were not fair to the natives. The natives were used by both the British and french, then thrown away,and left to die. Have you ever bothered to look at the statues of the natives today? They live in conditions similar to a third world nation. I Hope you enjoyed your ban, it was will deserved

Deleted

Nope, it'll probably be some russians pros They've won every inter-community contest On an unrelated note: PLease, tell me how to hack server