I SAID NO!!!

what do you mean, you'd have to see it too? he did not say he'd have to see it.. he only asked for details and requested for me to show it to him. and i already said i can't show it so no point in asking again, either use your imagination or get out. basically this is what it'd look like, except you replace the liver with moving tesseract(s) like the one in that gif. everything around the tesseracts will seem as though it's just transparent empty space. this way, the fact that it looks like it is within something already perceived as 3 dimensional helps the brain to assume the 3rd dimension in on something 2 dimensional automatically.

i think it's very stupid that there's a countdown at all... i mean, if it's immune to it's own damage then what's the point of the countdown?? If they wanna make it immune to it's own bomb then they should just remove the countdown and let it explode instantly

no I'm sorry but I can't.. but I was thinking that instead of the paint covering the surface of the tank, they could make it look like it is within the tank like this : except that you replace it with a hypercube(s)

our brain already automatcally processes the world in 11 dimensions. our sense of reality is already based on 11 dimensions https://nypost.com/2017/06/13/the-human-brain-sees-the-world-as-an-11-dimensional-multiverse/ as such, we can create structures up to 11 dimensions https://www.sciencealert.com/science-discovers-human-brain-works-up-to-11-dimensions https://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/our-brains-think-in-11-dimensions-discover-scientists and because of this, we can also think in 4 or more dimensions https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/12/07/einstein-could-easily-think-in-four-dimensions-and-its-a-skill-most-people-can-train/#13b5024b34fd as for making a 4 space in a 2 space, I know that is impossible. but that wasn't what i was talking about. what I was talking about was to make something to trick/help the brain in seeing 4 dimensions. just like how we can already trick the brain into seeing 3 dimensions in 2 dimensions. that gif did it. and for the paint it'd be easier because it'd be in something already perceived as 3 space.

haven't I already uploaded that tesseract gif 4 times?

nooooob

our physical being is restricted to 3 space... but not our minds computers can process data in the form of a hypercube... and the brain is proven to be more powerful than any supercomputer

yeah really, why don't you explain it then :lol: btw I was talking in terms of geometry, and not computing or unified theory of everything I understand that the surface of the tank is still 2 dimensional, but because the tank itself is 3 dimensional, they won't have to draw as much to depict the depth dimension. because it is easier to picture a 4 dimensional object if it is within a 3 dimensional object rather than a 2 dimensional one. yes, i know that the tank is really 2 dimensional but it is already depicted as 3 dimensional. so it should be easier to depict something 4 dimensional in 2 dimensions if we depict it inside something that's depicted as 3 dimensional. because when they see that's it's inside something 3 dimensional they already assume the possibility of a 3rd dimension. and this means less lines and effects would be needed to help them see it. also, what exactly do you mean by "the fourth dimension"? which one? IN what? relative time? spacetime? there is no "4th dimension" in everything. whatever is your "4th dimension" depends on which other dimension you need to take into account. because there is an infinite number of dimensions so any one could be the 4th. In M theory they use 11 dimensions, in superstring they use 10, in bosonic string they use 26.

I don't think it'd take too much effort to make a paint like that gif. maybe it's gonna cost them some time and money but... wouldn't you agree that a real tesseract is so mind blowing that a lot of people would pay 100 euros for an animated paint wit real tesseracts? just look at how many people spent money for some stupid screaming faces or blinking eyes... imagina how much money they could make from a paint that depicts 4 dimensions

it is possible, as the tank is already 3 dimensional so all they have to do is add 1 more dimension if they can show 4 dimensions in that 2 dimensional gif i don't see how they can't show 4 dimensions on a 3 dimensional tank they could be more artistic and do a proper one. or at least not make something so clearly 3 dimensional and call it a tesseract. like really, squares are 2 dimensional so overlapping squares only makes it 3 dimensional.

should i save for dictator or godofwar? I am usually the arsehole in my team. if i see a teammate playing badly i push or flip him if i have the chance if my team is lousy then i just sabotage them because they deserve to lose

it's clear now. he's deliberately ignoring us. cause he could move this to archive but not reply. flexoo is a terrible person and organizer

show me a real hypercube (or at least a real tesseract) when the paint hypercube was released i didn't have much to complain about because it wasn't animated so it would be very hard to show any real hypercubes it. then they released the tesseract paint... it was animated yet they couldn't even show a proper tesseract. I don't understand what's so hard with that. my idea is to change the name of tesseract camo to something else and make a real tesseract animated paint. I know it probably doesn't matter for most because they don't even know what tesseract or hypercube is but i just want something called a tesseract to look like one. besides, a real tesseract looks alot better than whatever they are trying to pass off as one so i think my idea can help the game make money. just look at this beauty

actually, aftrer thinking about string theory for a while... I think maybe they're gonna discard it soon. because for now they just keep on adding dimensions for it to work... It's not like i think they will realise that string theory is wrong but rather i think that they will come up with another theory derived from what they have gotten from string theory. so i think that soon it will be whatever they call this string theory 2.0 vs loop quantum gravity...

when he's not looking, i would turn it into a site for some ;) videos

allahu akbar!!

nah, yours was already enough for the both of us. let's see.. crying about my intelligence, about my past, about me losing etc pretty much bring up everything irrelevant to the topic or already so obvious to everyone just so you make yourself feel better cause you really need to. yep, that's enough raging for everyone here in fact. to think you said you could convey a point without offending the community... yet here you are trying to offend me with stuff competely irrelevant. at least i conveyed my point while offending you. you didn't even convey anything and fail to offend me. and don't deny that you weren't offended, you're not the kind write a whole post and use 89 words in it to try and insult someone. had you really been american then at least it would be understandable for you to think like one. to think you're not actually one but somehow confused their way of counting seasons with the way of the language of the question was asked in... you must really have some problems comprehending the world around you.

well.. not exactly but more or less.. I was saying that because the questions were asked in british english, we should interpret it in british english. that american who asked me to interpret it the way his weird people uses their own version of the language (among other things) should get out of my face. because there is no reason i should interpret the question in other languages that the questions aren't asked with. for british, 1 season is one year so measuring in seasons is measuring time. also, 1 season can be any amount of episodes so measuring in seasons isn't measuring total quantity. but i think you probably did understand me anyways

it will shoot something out of that hole it has in it's front. that thing it shoots out can penetrate through walls and affect multiple enemies.

what map? is not a series because it doesn't continue from one issue to another. and now what's the definition of long running? yeah that's right lasting for a long time or continuing for a long time. they didn't say anything about number of articles so i don't see any reason to even take that statistic into account. the only statistic that should be taken into account would be timespan.

you just said that it's contextual... and now you decide that number of seasons comes before timespan? yes, that was my mistake but... you can apply what i said to #6 and #7 and viola, length does not equal to number of episodes unlike what those clowns are saying in any case, that list is for american shows, and for them, one season can be any timespan and any amount of episodes. however, for british, the language flexoo speaks... one season is always one year (but any amount of episodes). so more seasons will alwyas mean more years and thus more time. I honestly don't see how americans can't seem to understand that it is not their language we are using here and their country is not the only country in the world. i already told him that we are speaking english here so whatever absurd stuff from his country has no bearing here. so they have a funny way of measuring temperature and distance and seasons and he wants me to "take it according to my intelligience" yeah i don't think so. I don't use it, we are not speaking in his language, so he can keep his national stupidity to himself tldr english is the language used here so whatever terms used here have to be interpreted in english. some american interprets it differently with his language is not my problem. in english 1 season is 1 year but it doesn't have a definite number of episodes. so when you count by season you count by years and not number of episodes english is not my language but i use it to interpret the question in english.. if he can use his language to interpret it can i use monegasque to do it? or is that only a priviledge for them because they can only speak one language

this is the page google took your results from. as you can see #3 has 21 more episodes than #2... explain that? simple, because #2 lasted over a longer period of time. 10 more days to be exact. so there we have it. what decides the ranking is timespan rather than episode count. because despite #3 having 21 more episodes, it got ranked lower than another show which lasted over a timespan 10 days longer

yeah that is american. for british, one season is always from a certain date to another certain date for each year. so it's still a matter of time and not quantity. during that 3 month "season" there could have been 5 episodes or 500 episodes, yet regardlessly, it stil gets counted as 1 "season" (even though in british it doesn't) as i have already said, flexoo usually speaks in british english. according to my intelligence you... have got some serious problems with yours.

thank you very much. and as we all know, a season may consist of an indefinite number of episodes but always consists of all episodes within a particular timeframe in a year. like all the episodes from march on one year to january for it's following year. so again, it's time and not number of episodes. I know that americans have a different way of counting their seasons in tv series but flexoo usually speaks british english so