that's still not doubling. and even if you give me an example of exactly doubling the reward your sentence would still be wrong. because the feature isn't to exactly double your reward if you consider it too little.

It was changed to 6 seconds weeks ago.

ever had them threatening to hide your posts for no reason so they could force you to talk about it in PM where they just purposely frustrate you with nonsencical arguments about how something that clearly exists can be considersed as non existent... cause that's what's goingon with me and this joker right now <_< imo threatening to hide my posts without a reason should be an offense

obviously i can't tell you which one, because that would be telling you the answer to 4 out of 6 of them

how? part of this question was asked in a previous newspaper quiz before. arabic was part of it, for this you just have to insert russian and german.

...what? how would 180 to 195 be doubling?

you can't say "too less" because "less" is not an adjective itself but rather it is a comparative of the adjective "little". also, 504 to 720 isn't doubling

maybe you were lagging so you didn't deal dalage at first... and the after a few seconds you dealt all that accumulated damage at once to instantly kill him.

finally a positive comment about me. why thank you, i like it too.

if you want people to read your long novels, you have to alwyas be dramatic and say things that will trigger other people. when other people get triggered, they will comment. people are attracted to drama so after that everyone will come and read what is going on.

find what? german is in germman community forum, russian is in russian community forum. the rest are all here.

some people.. have well... superior bodily functions than most others. what may take you a lot of time to do, some others can do it effortlessly within a couple seconds. maybe you're from a country where they tell you every body is born equal, yeah that's not true

thanks, but I'm probably too late now

i don't understand... do you start counting from the actual date they stated having their own isiues? or just the date of their first article

found it as stated here. they said that the system will change, and that for the player who does the most useful actions in a game mode will get more points. meaning capturing points (reffering to CP), stealing flags, destroying flag carriers (both reffering to CTF) and so on. This "and so on" is the key. by "and so on" they are talking about important actions in other modes. and we all know what is the most important action in TDM. KILLING.

I think that the problem is that the spawn killing team has access to the drop boxes of the whole map so they can always arrive with full supplies while the team getting spawn killed can only activate 1 supply and then a repair (which is gonna get cancelled before it fully heals) which may help them last slightly longer but isn't enough to get enemies with 3 supplies activated out of their base. another problem is that they spawn at different times so each time they spawn they'll have to face 2 or 3 enemies and die very quickly so they won't be there by the time their next teammate spawns. solution for the supplies problem is trooper drone. solution for driving enemies out of their base is blaster drone. the way to prevent too many enemies from getting in is saboteur drone.

in the psychological evaluation test during the selection for that unit where i learned HALO/HAHO jumping... that psycologist thought he was entering my mind but it was really me entering his and finding out what he was looking for and replicating it to fool him into thinking that i was what they needed. needless to say, this was why no one expected me to get kicked out not long after i completed the selection, trainning and then a few missions. not just ouf of that unit, but out of the whole military

it's just 25%... can't even catch a dictator with that :mellow:

my points are correct but he doesn't deserve them... hmm... so, he transcends reality? don't see it as bashing :) like @C.O.N.Q.U.E.R.O.R said, be positive. see it as teaching him to be a proper reporter. anyway thank you very much for your input :)

oh okay good. lol had i known earlier i wouldn't have rushed you to end week #8 then

but... week #11 question could also appear anytime now?

what's the hold up? the week is already over

they just dissapear.

what would that have to do with cosmonautics day? that photo was done by astronomers, astrophysicts, theoritical physicts... people who study space and not people who go there. More importantly, what does that have anything to do with this celebration about Yuri Gagarin going into space? no offense, but you seem like someone who has never ever seen anyone celebrate this in real life before. it's about an event in the past, not recent achievements

stop being a hypocrite. you used public opinion to bend the definition of a word, but now when i use it i need actual proof? public opinion was all you needed to change the fact that their announcement didn't qualify as an announcement despite the fact that their announcement fits the cambridge definition of an announcement. now that i have public opinion stating something against you, you bloody well accept it you gonna demand proof, then i demand proof from whoever answered your "poll" as well as your proof when you "don't consider" it as an announcment despite the fact that it fits the cambridge definition of an announcement. but for them, nothing changed. announcing that we can't do it now would be like saying that we could actually have done it before thereby contradicting the fact that they said we wouldn't in the first place also, if they didn't do it, then thy might not ecven have known it was done. so saying that it was a "covert" update was an assumption as they might not even have known about it themselves