Yeps, same problem for me too

Nice feedback with good arguments and thoughts - do hope somebody still are reading these late comments ?

G'day. I liked and disliked both experiments - so no clear answer to what was best and/or worst of them, also in comparison with the not experimental mode (I must admit though, that once again being able to play on 'new' maps in the 16 vs. 16 experiment have been absolutely great - I have really missed more maps in the MM battles!!). So, after having thought a little about these experiments and normal game mode too, I got to the conclusion, that possibilities for some more diversity in the MM battles, at least for me, would be really nice. One idea I got to think of, was to do/add a kind of a matrix to the MM battles, where you could choose what kind of combination/combinations you would like to play. Probably one should be 'forced' to choose 3-4 of the combinations, which you then randomly were connected to in the MM battles - this to prevent people to only play one combination all the time and also to decrease waiting time. The matrix I thought of contains three parameters (axis) with two values on each parameter: 1. axis Parameter: Maps Values: Small and Big 2. axis Parameter: Players Values: Few and Many 3. axis Parameter: Time Values: Short and Long This matrix hence contains eight combinations, but you can easily increase/decrease number of combinations (e.g., in 'Time' values could be 'Short, 'Medium' and 'Long') - if so wanted - and the numbers in the values can also easily be changed (e.g., in 'Players' 'Few' could be 6 and 'Many' 16 or any other number). If this matrix or something alike or a part of it could be added to the MM battles, I think this would increase level of satisfaction at quite some players, as the matrix can cover quite some different areas/playing styles. At least I hope/interpret so - after having read some of the comments regarding these experiments. The only thing I'm a bit worried about is the waiting time and that's why I propose, that players should be forced to choose 3-4 combinations, as this makes it's faster to reach the wanted/needed number of players. Hope this thought will rise some interest. Slainté

Howdy, and happy New Year to all - may the next decade be as good as the previous!! Having been playing Tanki for some years (6-7?? would be nice for us old people, if the starting date was displayed somewhere ?). Anyway, have so far been a free rider in this game and have been satisfied with that choice, but being a non-drugger (except for using OD's) it's getting more and more difficult to make the missions. So what I would like is, that Tanki developed a 'second' Premium possibility (maybe named Pro or the like) where players get the possibility to make the missions also in Pro-battles without any other advantages (if you want that, then buy Premium). It would at least solve my problem as I in Pro battles would be able to chose what can and can't be used. Secondly it would allow people to play on maps they like and still being able to make the missions (as mentioned before here the matchmaking variety of maps isn't as wide as at least I would like it to be). Thirdly it also gives possibility to play with players you know/like without having to create a group, so you can play both with and against players you know - this possibility disappeared with matchmaking and at least I miss this possibility. Got no clue if this idea have been presented before (if so and it has been dumped, then just forget it) or if anyone else than me would be interested in this kind of solution. But as I see it, the idea would compensate Tanki a bit for a less use of supplies and so on, by paying a smaller fee for being able to play more freely/as you would like and otherwise being as as a no-payer player. And by the way - this idea is probably not at once ready to implement, so some modifying and so on for sure is okay. Have fun - see you around!!