Why should Gauss have a longer recovery time than Striker? Striker already has a longer time for delivery in the fact that it isn't hitscan like Gauss is, and the missiles can be dodged. Also, Striker has a longer locking time, both of which contribute to balancing its higher damage per salvo. Also, 2 seconds is a ridiculous amount of time to recover your aim, and I cannot believe it took them two years to nerf it. I think 1 seconds for both should be fine, honestly. The splash distribution needs a nerf, too. A 452 square meter area of 90% and up damage is ridiculous for the locking time and damage of Gauss salvos. I would say a 5 meter average and 15 meter weak would be a good start.

50 in 1753, as of right now, but the odds only keep getting worse. I fully expect the fund to reach 8 million and the winner bundles to total to 450, at least, if not more, and the chances to be be closer to 1 in 2000 or less by the time this event has run it's course.