Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Hammer vs Vulcan


 Share

Hammer vs Vulcan  

73 members have voted

  1. 1. Which one do you prefer and why?

    • Hammer
      48
    • Vulcan
      25


Recommended Posts

Hammer_m3.png

Plus.pngExcellent damage. Highest impact of all guns. Ability to damage several tanks with one shot.

Minus.pngLimited effective fire range. Long reload. Impossible to reload before all shots in a clip are used.

 

 

150px-Turret_minigun_m3.png

Plus.pngGood accuracy and high rate of fire. Ability to shoot without reloading. Considerable impact force.

Minus.pngDamage is decreasing over distance. Shooting for a long time may lead to self-damage. Turret's rotation speed decreases when shooting.

Edited by JohnathanFerrell
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vulcan is better. In team battle it really makes the difference.

 

Also, just think a Vulcan with 50% paint protection (firebird) shooting indefinitely...

Think again if hammer is your first option.

 

Probably both are overpowered because so many people not owning protection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a doubt.The impact force of hammer is the lowest of all guns with an IF.But when shooting a tank in air,the hammer was able to overturn a dictator,while a railgun cannot.Why?

 

Also,about this.Hammer would be my preference out of the two.Whenever my twins are upgrading,hammer is the second choice due to:

 

1)With double damage,it could be called as The Annihilator.

 

2)Even without double damage,has excellent damage.A gun to look out for.

 

3)Spread fire (Works like a shot gun)

 

Personally,I don't like Vulcan.Yes,It could be a good sniper gun but the damage and temperature increase are it's two great weaknesses.So I don't like it that much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...