The stupidest sight in tanki today

[wolverine848 13,097]

17 minutes ago, sarim2345_the_master said:

The battle timer starts the moment a battle is created, doesnt matter if players are in it or not

you dont see higher than that because of player loading times

I understand.  The "dumb" part is directed at short battles in general.

They give us "7 min" battles but we never actually see 7 minutes of battle.  It's always less, and IMO that's just too short.

[TinBoxGunner 140]

These devs are so greedy and incompetent.   Again had a batlle in my acc with GS1100, average being about GS1300.  One rico had GS5300 and decimated the whole team.

His K/D ratio was 36 / 3.   Come on you greedy devs.  Get some competent devs in your team.....

Why bother.... I will just go away from battles if someone has totally OP GS-number.

[TinBoxGunner 140]

I forgot, this is Russia, the land of cheats, fakes and doping buyBabies.....

[SONIC-BOOM 326]

Seeing tanks that are not tanks on top of walls and buildings. 

[Mirzaubaidullah 52]

I died over there at purple mark and we lost point. spawned here and look what I found ↓ 

[Mirza7 235]

I opened containers and got

 Assault rounds
      

[alkyng 3,080]

On 1/4/2021 at 8:11 AM, Mirza7 said:

I opened containers and got

 Assault rounds
      

What about me? I paid it with my crystals, I think it's very useful for me (not because it's a cheap) but I like the high impact force.

 

Edited January 12, 2021 by asem.harbi

[alkyng 3,080]

Reach to Legend (without buying) or the players who considered themselves as aren't a buyers.

While they in real have bought in the game with many dollars, but they consider this as a nothing or a small amount of buying. Or whose creating a videos rtl (without buying), then you get stunned by the amount of Gold-Boxes that dropped from friends or a promo codes

Yes in real there are many buyers even in the forums who consider themselves as a non-buyers, considering the amount that they bought is such a neglectable.

So after that I have a rule in my mind (and I think many agrees), if you bought in the game even 1$ you directly considered as a buyer, whatever the less-benefit you get, you are a Buyer. Though in real, 1$ is such a neglectable thing and wont change that much, but to put a limit of this farce from ones who considering the amount they paid is such a neglectable, so we should consider even 1$ is a directly consider as a buyer. Also sometimes paying in the game even with a little amount of money, say in example 10$, with the correct discounts and well thinking that will put you in a huge advantage. Also sometimes the non-buyer is in real just about to buy something in a discounts and his crystals are close to the item but he couldn't, then buying 1$ will change this crucial thing and he could buy the kit though the 1$, and this will in the end accumulate after each other with this kit and will be a strong one. So directly paying anything in the game should consider you as a buyer.

Also let's take in example there is a RTL video with purely 100% no buying (no promo-codes no Gold drops). I'm against consider this as a non-p2w account, why?? because most times this player wont play in this account day after day, and will play rarely (as the most time will be in their main account). So this will directly make him benefit from every event, and finishing weekly missions slowly, and maybe many of them just stucking in one combo. So this shouldn't consider as a non-buyer player, or in other meaning I hope to not hear as a very skilled high-level non-buyer or to show how the game is balanced. Btw, even with RTL farces, we aren't obligated to believe such a videos even if was a really without buying anything.

I'm not here against paying in the game, or against any buyer. I'm here strongly against the farce of many buyers considering themselves as a non buyers.

If you reach reading to here, Thanks pro

Edited January 12, 2021 by asem.harbi

[Mirza7 235]

5 hours ago, asem.harbi said:

 

[Blutaar 1,904]

Came in this Rugby-battle today and noticed that 3 Mortars were camping at the opposite team, as well as an EM-salvo. Some of them had viking equipped; in some minutes our entire base was filled with red mines. Balance-issues are often subjectively based and opinions may often differ, but come on, this is no fun...

[alkyng 3,080]

Players actions aren't a predictable. Saw a Viking with 100% OD in Juggernaut, I safely went to fight him as I know he wont use the OD on me but against our Juggernaut. Strangely after I jumped to fight him, he wasted the OD just against me, though our Juggernaut was something near him. happens a lot

I wonder how some players think and play!! 

[wolverine848 13,097]

Assault on desert map - 6 campers on attacking team.

Why does desert only have 2 flags in assault?  Much easier for defending team.

[alkyng 3,080]

Again and again, the player who take the game seriously and spamming in the Chat for every reason they died for.

Like, ooh lag, or insulting another as a lagger, or saying "my team is a noob", or any any reason to not make me think he is a noob because I killed him or he is a loser.

Wait wait, did I care about that? did I care about you? It's just a MM battle and I wont see you again, I play and finish my missions then leaving, for sure wont think about You. Except if you're my friend or a well known one to me, maybe I could understand why you gave me excuses about your death.

And for sure the most sentence I hate is "my team is noob", I see it's like an arrogance and excuses for a thing that no one asked him about that. Someone tried to get the flag, then when he about to death he didn't found an Isida... so crying in Chat my team is noob then leaving.

I know I posted multiple times, but what I can do! stupid acts are a lot

[wolverine848 13,097]

we won a CP battle 30-5.

Top 3 players on losing team had higher score than anyone on winning team.  Because they played TDM and just killed tanks, even when they had a chance to cap.

It's amazing how dumb and/or selfish some players are.  Team battles are wasted on those noobs.

[SONIC-BOOM 326]

Unless you are in a group team play is virtually non-existent.

 

[alkyng 3,080]

1 hour ago, wolverine848 said:

we won a CP battle 30-5.

Top 3 players on losing team had higher score than anyone on winning team.  Because they played TDM and just killed tanks, even when they had a chance to cap.

It's amazing how dumb and/or selfish some players are.  Team battles are wasted on those noobs.

I'm not sure if anyone agree with me, but I see the solution is to make the loser team losing a high percentage of the reward. Before MM if your team lose in example in CTF without capturing any flag, no one will receive any reward even if your score was very high and you spent an hours in the battle. For sure it was horrible and unbalanced, but nowadays the reward for loser team is a way too high that maybe made the players in loser team overcome the winner team in the reward.

Btw, it's a shame for them as CP mode didn't require a lot of team work (like capturing the flag) it's a really easy to stand in a point for some seconds.

[ThirdOnion 4,898]

7 hours ago, asem.harbi said:

I'm not sure if anyone agree with me, but I see the solution is to make the loser team losing a high percentage of the reward.

I don't think this would be very effective since battle rewards make up a smaller percentage of the crystal income now than they did before because of missions and challenges.

[wolverine848 13,097]

9 hours ago, asem.harbi said:

I'm not sure if anyone agree with me, but I see the solution is to make the loser team losing a high percentage of the reward. Before MM if your team lose in example in CTF without capturing any flag, no one will receive any reward even if your score was very high and you spent an hours in the battle. For sure it was horrible and unbalanced, but nowadays the reward for loser team is a way too high that maybe made the players in loser team overcome the winner team in the reward.

Btw, it's a shame for them as CP mode didn't require a lot of team work (like capturing the flag) it's a really easy to stand in a point for some seconds.

Now it's ALL about the missions and Challenges.  Many players don't care about the mode or winning, so long as they get their daily missions done.  It's sad.  The quality of battles since Challenges were introduced has been terrible.

2 hours ago, ThirdOnion said:

I don't think this would be very effective since battle rewards make up a smaller percentage of the crystal income now than they did before because of missions and challenges.

 

[Flexoo 6,980]

So, I was in a TDM battle with my very noobish, but effective Mk8 combo of Hooper/Magnum, and there was this guy with VIking/Smoky 9999 GS, obviously with maxed out Defender, so in other words giant pain in a butt to destroy.

As it is painfully obvious, my combo isn't made for direct head to head combat, like let's say Firebird, so when this guy comes for me, I start maneuvering around the map with my Hooper and using Magnum's splash and ability to shoot over the map props to destroy the guy in the process.

And then this guy writes in a chat; "HA, so you like to play hide 'n' seek flexoo"

Spoiler

I found that mildly annoying and funny. I did not reply, but oml.

"Excuse me good sir. Next time I will go directly to you with my light hull and turret that is almost useless in head to head combat just so you can get yet another kill with that painfully underwhelming combo of yours."

Edited January 21, 2021 by Flexoo

[SONIC-BOOM 326]

1 hour ago, Flexoo said:

So, I was in a TDM battle with my very noobish, but effective Mk8 combo of Hooper/Magnum, and there was this guy with VIking/Smoky 9999 GS, obviously with maxed out Defender, so in other words giant pain in a butt to destroy.

As it is painfully obvious, my combo isn't made for direct head to head combat, like let's say Firebird, so when this guy comes for me, I start maneuvering around the map with my Hooper and using Magnum's splash and ability to shoot over the map props to destroy the guy in the process.

And then this guy writes in a chat; "HA, so you like to play hide 'n' seek flexoo"

  Reveal hidden contents

I found that mildly annoying and funny. I did not reply, but oml.

"Excuse me good sir. Next time I will go directly to you with my light hull and turret that is almost useless in head to head combat just so you can get yet another kill with that painfully underwhelming combo of yours."

Your combo is a legal hack (the hull) so stop complaining. I've not come across a player yet who has a good word to say about the FLYING CHEAT.

In other words the FLYING HACK is despised, and rightly so.

You have a unfair advantage in most battles. A good player will never beat a good cheat.

So good sir, you want to run around with a legal hack, take the criticism for doing so.    

[alkyng 3,080]

31 minutes ago, SONIC-BOOM said:

Your combo is a legal hack (the hull) so stop complaining. I've not come across a player yet who has a good word to say about the FLYING CHEAT.

In other words the FLYING HACK is despised, and rightly so.

You have a unfair advantage in most battles. A good player will never beat a good cheat.

So good sir, you want to run around with a legal hack, take the criticism for doing so.    

No you're wrong, I don't criticize who play with those hulls. What the wrong thing he did? It's just a stupid action by developers that they allowed for this hull.

I don't criticize a buyer for his strength, but I just criticize who bragging for their skills or insulting others by noobs forgetting that their strength is just by paying. Here I convert a real insulter against them and if I didn't afraid from Chat banned maybe I will go further..

Btw, the person with a sniper turret in example Hornet-Railgun, shouldn't fight a one with Viking-Smoky, the game shouldn't be a face-to-face game, it's not a logical thing.

Edited January 21, 2021 by asem.harbi

[Flexoo 6,980]

42 minutes ago, SONIC-BOOM said:

Your combo is a legal hack (the hull) so stop complaining. I've not come across a player yet who has a good word to say about the FLYING CHEAT.

In other words the FLYING HACK is despised, and rightly so.

You have a unfair advantage in most battles. A good player will never beat a good cheat.

So good sir, you want to run around with a legal hack, take the criticism for doing so.    

Interesting how you jump to conclusions based on assumptions and your own opinions.

The fact, I had Hopper equipped actually did not play any role at all, but you just directly jumped on that train simply because of your negative opinion of Hooper. I did not use my overdrive, not even a Speed boost or a drone to really bring out that broken Hooper cheat you seems to be so passionate about in your reaction. If anything, it was actually that guy with a drone who had the advantage in equipment. Some aspects of Hooper are indeed questionable and it certainly does bring problems to the game, especially when paired with other OP equipment like Crisis drone, for example. But, you just picked one part of the statement without knowing any details and wrapped all your theory around it.

I could achieve the same result by using Wasp or Hornet, and possibly even a medium hull on track. The point was that this person expected easy kills and was probably a bit salty about not achieving it when he simply threw away his advantage by the choice of his equipment and approach.

[Spy 14,687]

1 hour ago, SONIC-BOOM said:

Your combo is a legal hack (the hull) so stop complaining. I've not come across a player yet who has a good word to say about the FLYING CHEAT.

In other words the FLYING HACK is despised, and rightly so.

You have a unfair advantage in most battles. A good player will never beat a good cheat.

So good sir, you want to run around with a legal hack, take the criticism for doing so.    

Look, we are well aware of the fact that you despises Hopper. It's overpowered and everybody agree with you. But despite all that, you can't blame players for using Hopper..

[SONIC-BOOM 326]

26 minutes ago, Flexoo said:

Interesting how you jump to conclusions based on assumptions and your own opinions.

The fact, I had Hopper equipped actually did not play any role at all, but you just directly jumped on that train simply because of your negative opinion of Hooper. I did not use my overdrive, not even a Speed boost or a drone to really bring out that broken Hooper cheat you seems to be so passionate about in your reaction. If anything, it was actually that guy with a drone who had the advantage in equipment. Some aspects of Hooper are indeed questionable and it certainly does bring problems to the game, especially when paired with other OP equipment like Crisis drone, for example. But, you just picked one part of the statement without knowing any details and wrapped all your theory around it.

I could achieve the same result by using Wasp or Hornet, and possibly even a medium hull on track. The point was that this person expected easy kills and was probably a bit salty about not achieving it when he simply threw away his advantage by the choice of his equipment and approach.

The fact you used it at all means you are endorsing imo a LEGAL HACK, which was made that way by the DEVS on purpose to get players to use cash to acquire it.

Furthermore not using your overdrive doesn't negate the fact that the FLYING CHEAT is OP, and should not be in the game.

I will never stop with the negative criticism, not until the devs start treating the players with respect, instead of the disgraceful way they act with their underhanded strategy when bringing in any update that usually requires cash to obtain.

These are the facts, not calling you persey, but using a hull like that will always get you a negative response. They are OP and should never have been brought into the game.

Just the devs being the devs, cash driven to the extreme. 

[SONIC-BOOM 326]

4 minutes ago, Spy said:

Look, we are well aware of the fact that you despises Hopper. It's overpowered and everybody agree with you. But despite all that, you can't blame players for using Hopper..

mmmm yes i can