category Ideas for Matchmaking System!

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

The Win/Lose mechanism is a good idea to form teams and send new players to teams.

 

But the Garage score should only be used to send new players to active battles.

[not.a.cat 21]

I'm being placed in battles where every single person is 3-5 ranks above me. This is ridiculous. 

 

You should not be able to join/be placed in a battle if ANYONE in the battle is 2-3 ranks higher or lower than you. This same restriction should apply to the Groups feature. This will make battles MUCH more fair, as opposed to battles filled with people who are an entire M level plus microupgrades higher than you. 

[Wes.Is.Just.A.Digger 1,712]

You all should understand one very simple thing: as long as the battle is drugs, mus and protection enabled it will never be a fair-(play) game where all players have equal chances. Anything else is pure speculation.

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

Automatically leave group when logging off

 

Small change that should be included when they fix MMS groups. Whenever you log off, you automatically log back on into the same group. This looks very unprofessional because there is probably no reason to stay in the same group after a couple of hours. 

[deyd 0]

A score multiplier based on team size

 

Sometimes I play on a team with a smaller group of tanks and we win.  It would be nice for those teams that are undersized to get a bonus...just a thought.

[RIDDLER_8 5,552]

Mini games should be free.

[Viking4s 10,791]

Minesweeper

[Benefactor 6,888]

Tanki Trivia.

[Tani_S 736]

Tetris!!!11  :lol:

 

*starting on Level 30

Edited July 12, 2018 by Tani_S

[Siddhant11 4]

It would be nice for those teams that are undersized to get a bonus.

+

and also if much bigger teams win, they should receive less crystals.

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

Once leaving MMS battle you can't be put back into it

 

I think something everyone wants. Look, I know the playerbase is as small as a tic-tac and there are probably only 1 or 2 battles going on simultaneously at my rank but I don't think it is a good idea for players to wait 2 minutes only to be put back into the same battle because 99.9999% of the time, they left because it was not a fair battle. 

[Maf 32,300]

The problem with this is that either MM will make a new battle for you (which is bad for the effectiveness for the MM system), or it will make you wait much longer in order to find a new battle, which isn't great either.

[mhh.2000 888]

All maps get equal chances in MM

 

I wish matchmaking was equal in all maps , I rarely play highways and sandal , but on the other hand MMS keeps putting me in massacre and wolvenstein , I hate both of them because they're too big . while I really like solimask and barda , yet I never get a chance to play in them .

so give all maps equal chances , then we can all be happy.

[Maf 32,300]

While the actual chance for the maps to be created is probably equal, your idea could be implemented on an individual basis. It would require a possibly quite complicated algorithm for the MM system so it most likely won't be implemented, but it's still an interesting concept. Basically, if you didn't play on a particular map for a long time, the game would search for battles on that map and it would put them in priority when selecing a battle for you. So rather than putting you in the very first suitable game, it would sometimes make you wait a bit longer, but put you in a map you haven't played for a long time.

 

Although personally I would rather just have the ability to vote for maps.

[CabbageRoll 3,018]

just make 3 categories like examples

sandal-small

highland-medium

highways-big

 

like if we have 15 maps simply categoriges are 5-5-5 by map surface size

 

i equip fire, i get brest

shaft, i get sandal

 

so stupid map choice...

 

let us choose one of those 3 and everyone is happy

Edited August 2, 2018 by CabbageRoll

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

I wish matchmaking was equal in all maps , I rarely play highways and sandal , but on the other hand MMS keeps putting me in massacre and wolvenstein , I hate both of them because they're too big . while I really like solimask and barda , yet I never get a chance to play in them .

so give all maps equal chances , then we can all be happy.

Really? Personally I get Highways and Sandal all the time. It's too rare that I get Rio or something.

 

I think the system was made so that it's an unbiased RNG. However, maybe you are suggesting that once the MMS realizes you haven't played this map in a long time, they will try putting you in battles of that map.

[r_Spytank2 129]

That explains why I keep getting put on some maps.

Most of which I hate.

[Musa 5,352]

While the actual chance for the maps to be created is probably equal,

I don't think so. I'm getting same 3-4 maps again & again, massacre, wolvenstein, Yoshikre, etc

[Maf 32,300]

I don't think so. I'm getting same 3-4 maps again & again, massacre, wolvenstein, Yoshikre, etc

Are you playing Juggernaut? Because I think the map variety is quite limited there for game balance purposes.

[Musa 5,352]

Are you playing Juggernaut? Because I think the map variety is quite limited there for game balance purposes.

Yep, most of the time I'm playing Juggernaut.

[Maf 32,300]

Yep, most of the time I'm playing Juggernaut.

Then it's understandable. Juggernaut only has about 7 maps available: Kungur, Desert, Aleksandrovsk, Barda, Bridges, Massacre and Wolfenstien. I think even Yorkshire, Brest, Solikamsk and Future have been removed, as I haven't played on them for a few days.

[Musa 5,352]

Then it's understandable. Juggernaut only has about 7 maps available: Kungur, Desert, Aleksandrovsk, Barda, Bridges, Massacre and Wolfenstien. I think even Yorkshire, Brest, Solikamsk and Future have been removed, as I haven't played on them for a few days.

I played in Brest and Yorkshire with Juggernaut today.

[BlackEliteEnemy2 250]

Then it's understandable. Juggernaut only has about 7 maps available: Kungur, Desert, Aleksandrovsk, Barda, Bridges, Massacre and Wolfenstien. I think even Yorkshire, Brest, Solikamsk and Future have been removed, as I haven't played on them for a few days.

Brest, Solikamsk and Yorkshire are still here for JGR.

[Maf 32,300]

Brest, Solikamsk and Yorkshire are still here for JGR.

OK, then maybe only Future got removed. I haven't played on it for at least 4 days.

[C.O.N.Q.U.E.R.O.R 3,845]

Option of either Winter or Summer

 

Since winter and summer are purely cosmetic, why not make it each player's choice as to which setting to play it in? Would also help snipers with camouflage.