What Is Your Opinion About the Current State of Tanki Online?

[wild001 1,422]

19 minutes ago, Tidebreaker said:

the Striker will just absolutely smash the Gauss with lock-on damage, which really doesn't even take that long to lock on compared to Gauss.

the aim lock hold on time (Aiming recovery time) of gauss is 2 sec, lock-on take 1.7s
the aim lock hold on time (Aiming recovery time) of striker is 1 sec, lock-on take 2.8s

means when both lock on each other,
- striker laser is easy to tell the timing of striker aim lock
 - just before 1 sec of aiming, gauss can hide behind wall for 1s
- striker 1s aiming lock is lost, gauss move out and continue aim 0.7s to fire
- striker has to restart aiming for 2.8s, after lock off by salvo shot
- if gauss stick with a wall, it is easy to tell flying rocket on last minute, and mostly hit by 1-2 rocket only

Edited March 15, 2021 by wild001

[alkyng 3,080]

12 hours ago, triglav said:

So why aren't all crytals returned and magnum simply deleted from avaliable turrets? 

Agree with you, because it's too OP.  When I looked to your profile you barely can use any turret than Magnum, and any hull than Hunter. So maybe this what made you think Magnum is UP? You haven't test the other turrets!! test them at least to realize that Magnum is OP..! Try to capture the flag with Hornet in example or any hull and you will realize how Magnum is really annoying.

I have used Magnum in my initials of this account for a long time, it was a really strong and gave me a huge advantage.

Its hardness of use, could be solved by just the first hour of using the turret, you have played 500+ hrs so you surely adopted with that (But it's not harder than Vulcan).

It's the second strongest turret with the single shot in the game after Shaft, higher than Railgun LCR and Gauss. And the highest impact force in the game higher than Shaft and any other turret.

It's approximately the only turret that you don't have to hit the target directly but you just have to hit the ground around him and he will day. Opposite of Railgun and Gauss and many other turrets that you have to hit the enemy directly to deal your damage. When I run with the flag, I can easily dodge Gauss/Railgun shots with hiding behind obstacles and they have to chase me and cross the obstacle to hit me. But Magnum, nope, they just shoot randomly in the ground around me and yeah I basically get destroyed with the huge splash-damage.

Magnum has the second hugest splash-damage radius in the game after Gauss, with hugely 20m radius. Isn't this compensate completely the hardness of use? Magnum are always just shooting randomly and it's really enough to damage a bunch of people altogether.  But if Magnum had to shoot me directly like Railgun, I can assure you that 80% of Magnum shots wont hit me ever.

I can confidently say that Magnum is the seconds most OP turret in the game after Gauss and maybe even more OP than Gauss.

Oh and even in some maps Magnum is incredibly dominator in them, like Noise If you played in the lower team, you will say how Magnum is disgusting there. But it's not in our discussion as it's a map from pro-battles not MM.

To be honest when I've read you said Magnum is the worst turret in the game, I hurried up just wanting to insult you without even giving my opinion, as I though no sane human can argue with this. But after I read your post I said umm maybe he haven't understand very well !

[mjmj5558 2,346]

8 hours ago, yellowghetto said:

What's the point of Striker. That needs to be deleted. It's just an embarrassing Gauss. It's only good in TJR and TJR is a pretty bad mode.

Which one was released earlier, striker or gauss? Striker. Which one should be deleted (if we want to delete one)? Gauss.

[alkyng 3,080]

16 minutes ago, Unleash said:

To be honest there isnt turret in tanki that is worst, and magnum require skill to use unlike gauss, also magnum is unique turret in its own way. And also magnum change limits of parkour to new level, no reason to be removed. Blame devs for making this game no skill required.

Striker and Vulcan requires much more skills to use than Magnum

[alkyng 3,080]

When the creator of the "What Is Your Opinion about the current state" have reached the topic with more than 101 pages... OMG Great ! and that represent our opinions and complaints about Tanki

But when you realize that he doesn't see Gauss EMP is OP nor Hopper is OP nor Booster 

So what the thing that he see is deserve to complain or have ruined the game and messed up the balance ?? !!

[mjmj5558 2,346]

25 minutes ago, asem.harbi said:

Striker and Vulcan requires much more skills to use than Magnum

Vulcan HI skills: put a brick on the spacebar. 

[yellowghetto 3,206]

2 hours ago, Tidebreaker said:

A skilled Striker user will absolutely wipe the floor with Gauss players to be honest. This especially applies for Remote Rocket Explosives - if the user is skilled, the Striker can just hit the guy behind the wall. I should add, given Striker's recent reload buff, it can actually hold its own now compared to Smoky, Thunder, as well as the arcades of Gauss, and Shaft.

Plus, be honest, without any Overdrive or drone, the Striker will just absolutely smash the Gauss with lock-on damage, which really doesn't even take that long to lock on compared to Gauss.

Funny you say that. I am a Remote Rocket Explosive Striker player and really good with it. Comparing it to my Electromagnetic Salvo. I’m very unimpressed. Have to disagree with you there. Striker sucks.

 

Modules would like to say hi!

Edited March 15, 2021 by yellowghetto

[yellowghetto 3,206]

44 minutes ago, asem.harbi said:

When the creator of the "What Is Your Opinion about the current state" have reached the topic with more than 101 pages... OMG Great ! and that represent our opinions and complaints about Tanki

But when you realize that he doesn't see Gauss EMP is OP nor Hopper is OP nor Booster 

So what the thing that he see is deserve to complain or have ruined the game and messed up the balance ?? !!

If I say Viking is OP how does it make you feel. Because it is. Hopper got it’s huge nerf. 
 

EMP Gauss, instantly countered by EMP Immunity. Both are Augments. I see no question there.

What’s a Booster? I only see Defenders.

I only answered what I can understand. The grammatical issues frighten me.

Edited March 15, 2021 by yellowghetto

[wild001 1,422]

If uranium striker still have 4 rocket, i would agree striker is best, but now it only has 2 rocket.

i have m7-20 striker, m7-20 magnum, m7-20 guass, they all better than my long loved railgun m7-20, because how many railgun protection there are. 

[alkyng 3,080]

2 minutes ago, yellowghetto said:

If I say Viking is OP how does it make you feel. Because it is. Hopper got it’s huge nerf. 

EMP Gauss, instantly countered by EMP Immunity. Both are Augments. I see no question there.

Hopper the hull itself is OP because it's unable to flip and it can cross over tank, but the Viking itself isn't OP because it's just a normal hull.

EMP Gauss is in a disadvantage against EMP Immunity, true. But it has 14m radius (or in the past 20m while you also wasn't see it's OP), the biggest problem of EMP Gauss was the huge splash-radius. Don't forget, if you zapped someone who have EMP Immunity that's wont vanish your EMP and your EMP will affect all of the other hulls.

I want you to imagine yourself in my place and I predict you will answer a decent answer

You're a f2p, and you always get wrecked by EMP Gausses.. But whenever you complain you get stunned by the EMP Gaussers (like you) who slap you and saying that it's weak because the EMP Immunity, while you couldn't even buy the EMP Immunity because it's a p2w thing.   What will you say? will eat your words and will stop consider EMP Gauss as OP above of your acceptance?

This is you if you wasn't lucky and get it from UCs, my opinion and my advice for you is Enjoy with your EMP you're lucky as you got it, but please go away from the discussions about it.

It's the same when I criticize Booster and you say nope Defender is more OP.. I will say to you either this or that they both are sucks and need to be removed from the game.

[alkyng 3,080]

12 minutes ago, wild001 said:

If uranium striker still have 4 rocket, i would agree striker is best, but now it only has 2 rocket.

You would agree that Uranium is the best** fixed it for ya

[E_polypterus 2,374]

Striker is good in its own way, for open areas which are crowded or areas with less cover. But Gauss is even better when trying out because of the ease of using it.

[Old_Man_Hotchy 0]

Can we replace the chief game designer, with some one who is not off his rocker ?.. Game is clogged up with laggy, flying tanks, and stupid things. It is no longer a game of skill, but one of chance. It is no longer fun any more, and the costs, are no longer cheap, and value driven entainment. Might as well spend my money on a PS5, and at least I will still have a residual value when I'm done with it..

Spending 100 euro's a month on this game, on multiple accounts, no longer makes sence.... Replace him now..

[alkyng 3,080]

23 minutes ago, Unleash said:

No striker isnt weak, and yes magnum require more skill than vulcan but not more than striker. Magnum and striker are equal in terms of skill. Its just there are so many alts ap nonsenses and drones that maybe make you think this. 

I can easily land my shot on the enemy with Magnum, but how many times I can do Salvo with Striker per battle? 3 ? 2? 1? or 0?

[alkyng 3,080]

45 minutes ago, MrCruise said:

That feature was removed because they did not want players to check their progress while in battles. Containers were removed from our garages for the same reason! The main problem was that players, instead of focusing on playing, they would stop in the middle of the battle to check their progress or open containers, which affected the team's performance.

That feature was removed because HTML5 is sucks and running from the identity of the real Tanki interface into a new sucks one

[alkyng 3,080]

2 minutes ago, Unleash said:

Striker isnt only about salvos.

Well, but the arcade shots are pretty sucks

[alkyng 3,080]

2 minutes ago, Unleash said:

Sorry but what? as far i know 1 rocket with double damage can do 1500 damage.

but without double damage it does 750 which is pretty sucks 

[cosmic666 1,055]

On 11/23/2020 at 8:10 AM, Venerable said:

This game is made for children!

If you want more challenges and strategies and stuff, I'm sure there are games out there that have difficult mechanics and tough-to-master controls. 

But Tanki isn't really meant to be so difficult.

 

The game is made for children.

Maybe back in the day, but now it caters to adult P2W------exclusively.

Kids don't keep TO ticking over, adults do.  

[alkyng 3,080]

1 minute ago, Unleash said:

Look i dont want argue, but because something doesnt do 3k damage in 1 shoot like gauss every 5-7 sec doesnt mean it "scks".

It has two parallel to shoot from which is really hard, its splash radius is just a useless, the rockets speed is a pretty slow, and lastly the damage doesn't worth all of the effort. So this is why I say the arcade mode is pretty sucks, And if someone don't give a care for the Salvo I advice him to never use Striker.

[SporkZilla 1,775]

I've just started with Striker (at Mk7-7 at the moment) and I don't get to use salvos much either, but I think that normal shots are quite effective

I've played for over 1600 hours with Smoky though, so my playing style is already based on chipping away at targets instead of trying to one-shot / salvo them, and I find aiming and remembering which side is going to fire quite easy

I'm too inexperienced to say that it's useless, but it is a lot of fun; I managed to kill someone on the other of Berlin yesterday and watching the rocket fly and hit was extremely satisfying

I was trying to finish the win 10 battles mission last night and Magnums (many with AP) were everywhere and giving me hell

At high ranks / Mks it's incredibly powerful for skilled players

Edited March 15, 2021 by SporkZilla

[cosmic666 1,055]

@Venerable I disagree. Adults are by far and away THE target audience.

You might get the numbers up with all the no lifer kids glued to their mobiles 24/7, but it's the 18 and above that the devs target, and no amount of claptrap will convince me otherwise.

TO is P2W and the kids do not possess credit cards which the devs prey on like circling vultures. 

 

[E_polypterus 2,374]

21 minutes ago, Unleash said:

Look i dont want argue, but because something doesnt do 3k damage in 1 shoot like gauss every 5-7 sec doesnt mean it "scks".

I think arcade shots aren’t that effective because of the slow speed and less damage compared together as asem said

[alkyng 3,080]

45 minutes ago, SporkZilla said:

I've just started with Striker (at Mk7-7 at the moment) and I don't get to use salvos much either, but I think that normal shots are quite effective

Well and that's what most of us do with Striker, and in this case Thunder is better. Though arcade shots for Striker isn't a very weak, but it's not as strong as Thunder. So if you (and we) will play Striker with only the arcade shots, Thunder is better. 

[alkyng 3,080]

@cosmic666 To be honest either if the players are adults or children I don't care.. I just wonder why the game became more easier nowadays and doesn't require that much of skill. Either the players are adults or children why in the past the game was a harder and the players was able to play and no problems with that. But nowadays the game is much easier !! Intresting question !! so this is why I say I don't care about the Tanki age group because.

But about saying this game is for children, ok if this wasn't from Maf or Venerable. And it was from a Developer, I will just ask him a simple question.. I'm not a children so do I have to leave the game? basic question.. If he answered yes then Bye, but if he answered No I will ask him why the cares are now for the children and the game become more easy.. So you don't have to tell me the game is for children because you either admitted that the game is a truly easy and no skills-based and I have to quit. Or you in real have to discuss with me to tell me how I'm wrong and the game doesn't getting easier.

So in conclusion don't tell me the game is for children because this directly indicate that what I said is true and I have to leave the game.

By the way please note, when I said Maf-Venerable I don't ever meaning that they're in less-value than developers. But in my real opinion and if you entered my heart I respect them both more than any developer or anyone, and Maf is the first one who I knew in the forum and he have a special respecting from me. But I mean the game is for the developers so their opinions are more important to indicate that I have to leave or continue!

[SporkZilla 1,775]

48 minutes ago, asem.harbi said:

Well and that's what most of us do with Striker, and in this case Thunder is better. Though arcade shots for Striker isn't a very weak, but it's not as strong as Thunder. So if you (and we) will play Striker with only the arcade shots, Thunder is better. 

Thunder is better, even though there might be more Grizzly modules than Orka modules, but it's not as much fun

More fun instead of better is an interesting decision because you might make your team weak if you choose one of the weaker turrets, but I would rather have Striker teammates instead of Shafts on heavy hulls that spend the entire battle in scoping mode