What Is Your Opinion About the Current State of Tanki Online?

[The-Operator219 88]

I wonder if anybody's raged on here about my Titan-Rail combo being overpowered yet. It was certainly more fun a couple years ago before the faster traverse speed augment was a thing since it was more of a joke build, but between that and Railgun in general getting faster it's become even more viable even without augments.

[sharifsahaf 656]

tanki is down to an average of 5 k daily player .truth be told even i play anymore .guess this is how it all ends

[Russty 368]

There are currently 2000 players online...

[TheCongoSpider 8,952]

3 hours ago, Russty said:

There are currently 2000 players online...

Because it was just before the server restart where the lowest number of players are available. It is off-peak time right now.

Edited July 16, 2020 by TheCongoSpider

[coconuttree 519]

Peak time player count still goes over 10k

[sharifsahaf 656]

Devs need to grow a pair and fix the game before its too late

[sharifsahaf 656]

51 minutes ago, At_Shin said:

A pair of what? If I may inquire of you.

the ammo of twins and ricochet minus the "plasma" part

[ghost-guns 1,486]

Garbage.

Homogenised, predictable, unfair and not even entertaining.

Edited July 16, 2020 by ghost-guns

[wolverine848 13,097]

10 hours ago, coconuttree said:

Peak time player count still goes over 10k

What was it... 3 years ago?   Or even 2 years ago?

[D.A.R.K.N.E.S.S 432]

On 7/15/2020 at 3:22 PM, wolverine848 said:

In theory you would think so... 1-2720  = 1360 avg damage.

Is it a Bell curve?  Does it hit the avg damage more often then the outliers?

But it does raise the avg damage by 160 - that is not insignificant.

And it gets a +20% impact on top of that.  Sounds like a true upgrade to me.

Not sure about the first 2 questions, but I would say 160 is a pretty insignificant sum. The impact force upgrade is an unnecessary addition but kind of makes sense with the "theme" of the augment - unstable rounds, higher damage shots, higher impact force. Scout's impact force is definitely more of an issue than on this augment. 

And no, it definitely isn't a true upgrade like something like the 5 clip augment for hammer would be as it is luck dependent, and if you don't get the upgrade all the time then it's a situational upgrade, not a true, constant upgrade. 

[wolverine848 13,097]

4 hours ago, D.A.R.K.N.E.S.S said:

Not sure about the first 2 questions, but I would say 160 is a pretty insignificant sum. The impact force upgrade is an unnecessary addition but kind of makes sense with the "theme" of the augment - unstable rounds, higher damage shots, higher impact force. Scout's impact force is definitely more of an issue than on this augment. 

And no, it definitely isn't a true upgrade like something like the 5 clip augment for hammer would be as it is luck dependent, and if you don't get the upgrade all the time then it's a situational upgrade, not a true, constant upgrade. 

Well 160 represents about +13% on average damage of 1200.  +13% is more than the max allowed by Brutus done.

So if the damage buff & nerf offset each other, that leaves a net 20% impact buff.  IMO that's a consistent upgrade.

[TheCongoSpider 8,952]

15 minutes ago, wolverine848 said:

Well 160 represents about +13% on average damage of 1200.  +13% is more than the max allowed by Brutus done.

So if the damage buff & nerf offset each other, that leaves a net 20% impact buff.  IMO that's a consistent upgrade.

The true upgrade to Railgun is "Death Herald" Compulsator. Out of all the energy restoration augments, "DH"C is the most fundamentally unbalanced. 

[DieselPlatinum 5,121]

6 hours ago, TheCongoSpider said:

The true upgrade to Railgun is "Death Herald" Compulsator. Out of all the energy restoration augments, "DH"C is the most fundamentally unbalanced. 

Attach a fully MUed crisis drone and hornet OD, and that's basically why.

[TheCongoSpider 8,952]

1 hour ago, DieselPlatinum said:

Attach a fully MUed crisis drone and hornet OD, and that's basically why.

I'm disregarding drones and Overdrives. Just talking about Stock Railgun vs "DH"C. 

[yellowghetto 3,206]

Tanki X did what Tanki Online don't

[wolverine848 13,097]

18 hours ago, yellowghetto said:

Tanki X did what Tanki Online don't

Fold?

[Moisthero 254]

Zero damage - generally a very bad idea, but here is an improvement:

if the re-spawning tank has immunity from hostile fire, then make it impossible for that tank to pickup a flag or a football until damage can be suffered.

[DarkFantasy 88]

I swear to god Defender drone really needs a nerf, man I play with thunder m4 and I barely do 120 damage cs ppl own that drone and think themselves pro. And if I ask for it, you might say it is little weak bcs it uses 3 DA per time. Its not the nerf, reduce the protection level of the drone. https://prnt.sc/tkghe1 Says ez and most of them were drone warriors. I swear I had better score than him tho I wasn't using drone. Also,, 

 

https://prnt.sc/tkgi0x Just 118 and 120 damage tho my thunder is m4. GG https://prnt.sc/tkgitr

[Snafu 139]

On 7/18/2020 at 11:39 PM, At_Shin said:

I have been at the receiving end of this unfair MM system

ММ is not unfair. It's just poorly implemented and largely random. In one battle you lose no matter how hard you try, in the other your team wins even if you do nothing. Neither situation is enjoyable. I would roughly estimate just 20% of MM battles that are actually fun with balanced teams and maps (try winning ASL for offence on Highways e.g.)

[Snafu 139]

32 minutes ago, At_Shin said:

And that is unfair.

Unfair means a constant bias towards one side. For example a roulette in casino where in the long run you are expected to lose is unfair. I don't know if such a bias exists in MM. Slow loading, AFK and fleeing players are random factors.

[sharifsahaf 656]

4 hours ago, Snafu said:

Unfair means a constant bias towards one side. For example a roulette in casino where in the long run you are expected to lose is unfair. I don't know if such a bias exists in MM. Slow loading, AFK and fleeing players are random factors.

MM is disastrous ,chaotic and works completely randomly .Either you get an OP team and decimate the other team or vice versa .so either it's unfair for them or for us .balanced matches exist very few ,so it's safe to say MM is mostly unfair

[sharifsahaf 656]

You guys wanna have a fun time ?.watch lucifer like i am instead of  playing tanki .It's awesome 

[Snafu 139]

16 hours ago, sharifsahaf said:

MM is disastrous ,chaotic and works completely randomly .Either you get an OP team and decimate the other team or vice versa .so either it's unfair for them or for us .balanced matches exist very few ,so it's safe to say MM is mostly unfair

I have no problem calling MM piece of garbage 

[yellowghetto 3,206]

This game is more pay to win then gacha mobile games i play.

[wolverine848 13,097]

On 7/20/2020 at 6:10 PM, Snafu said:

ММ is not unfair. It's just poorly implemented and largely random. In one battle you lose no matter how hard you try, in the other your team wins even if you do nothing. Neither situation is enjoyable. I would roughly estimate just 20% of MM battles that are actually fun with balanced teams and maps (try winning ASL for offence on Highways e.g.)

Actually - here's how MM IS unfair.

My alt account is now Marshal.  But many (most?) battles I'm placed in with Legends.  I have a top-3 mission to complete.  It's hard enough to complete that when you face your peers (avg of 60 battles for top-3 x15).  But when you are lumped with players that have items which are 12% to 25% better than yours (not to mention drones) it becomes much, much harder to complete.

So individually, when MM assigns me to battles with players significantly higher, that IMO is unfair.