contest Parkour Survival 2020

[Foo 22]

1 minute ago, Mr.Nibbles said:

But you never thought to realize that the player Dynasty participated as a part of another team with the account Destin? They are both the same person, this was indicated in Masters of Parkour 2019.

@Pout @Do.Or.DiE

yes but i dont think their team broke any rules?

[Devoid 2,601]

Just now, Cee said:

yes but i dont think their team broke any rules?

Nout was supposedly eliminated from the contest for violating the rule "You can't participate with alternate accounts," so why isn't Dynasty/Destin similarly eliminated from the contest for the same reason?

[Foo 22]

2 minutes ago, Mr.Nibbles said:

Nout was supposedly eliminated from the contest for violating the rule "You can't participate with alternate accounts," so why isn't Dynasty/Destin similarly eliminated from the contest for the same reason?

No, Nout was eliminated because his alt-accounts team broke the rules.

Edit: actually im not sure they keep chaning the rules anyways

Edited October 17, 2020 by Cee

[Goges 7,262]

34 minutes ago, Mr.Nibbles said:

Nout was supposedly eliminated from the contest for violating the rule "You can't participate with alternate accounts," so why isn't Dynasty/Destin similarly eliminated from the contest for the same reason?

Nout was forcibly removed from the team he was in, because he violated the rules of the contest. And not because there is a rule saying "You can't participate with alternate accounts".

In the General rules of the contest we said;

You can have a second team of low rank accounts (at the ranks of at least one level of equipment lower than the high accounts) in addition to a team of high rank accounts, but both teams must use different parkour tricks.

[Devoid 2,601]

4 minutes ago, Goges.Enze said:

 

Accounts Dynasty and Destin are NOT one level of equipment level lower than each other (both have Mk7 equipment)

[Foo 22]

1 minute ago, Mr.Nibbles said:

Accounts Dynasty and Destin are NOT one level of equipment level lower than each other (both have Mk7 equipment.

He has mk1 wasp.

[Venerable 2,967]

1 minute ago, Mr.Nibbles said:

Accounts Dynasty and Destin are NOT one level of equipment level lower than each other (both have Mk7 equipment)

It seems that since Destin has Wasp Mk1, while Dynasty has Wasp Mk7, it fits the rules...

[Devoid 2,601]

2 minutes ago, Cee said:

He has mk1 wasp.

2 minutes ago, Venerable said:

It seems that since Destin has Wasp Mk1, while Dynasty has Wasp Mk7, it fits the rules...

So you're telling me it's allowed for me to participate with both my Legend accounts? I don't think this should be the case...

[Foo 22]

1 minute ago, Mr.Nibbles said:

So you're telling me it's allowed for me to participate with both my Legend accounts? I don't think this should be the case...

Yes, but you have to be in different teams.

[Venerable 2,967]

Just now, Mr.Nibbles said:

So you're telling me it's allowed for me to participate with both my Legend accounts? I don't think this should be the case...

Honestly, I'm just trying to see how it could be justified by the organizers. I myself had wanted to participate using this rule, and had requested Amar to join my team from his low-ranked alt. But this rule is very vague, and Amar declined my request because he didn't want to risk getting disqualified. 

If Dynasty is still participating, and the organizers know about his alts, then surely it's allowed. Destin must be using Wasp Mk1 definitely, otherwise he'll get disqualified. 

[Foo 22]

2 minutes ago, Venerable said:

Honestly, I'm just trying to see how it could be justified by the organizers. I myself had wanted to participate using this rule, and had requested Amar to join my team from his low-ranked alt. But this rule is very vague, and Amar declined my request because he didn't want to risk getting disqualified. 

If Dynasty is still participating, and the organizers know about his alts, then surely it's allowed. Destin must be using Wasp Mk1 definitely, otherwise he'll get disqualified. 

yes, I think if you use something thats not lower equipment then its not allowed. Address also had mk1, but i  guess he used something mk7

[Goges 7,262]

@Venerable Any member who has a question about something that is un-clear for him, he could have contacted the contest organizers to clarify

[Venerable 2,967]

1 minute ago, Goges.Enze said:

@Venerable Any member who has a question about something that is un-clear for him, he could have contact the contest organizers to clarify

Yeah, I know, but thanks! 

This was the first time that I was participating in such a team event, and I was very confused in the beginning. Well, things are clearer to me now.

Anyway, my "team" couldn't clear the first challenge, so we aren't participating. I'm just following this contest out of interest. So it doesn't really matter much if the rule is unclear to me... it matters more to those who are participating. 

If you could explain the rule here, it would be great! However, I understand that you might have to look into each individual case differently, and I think that justifies the vagueness of the concerned rule. Only those who are being a part of another team using this rule should contact the organizers, if I understood correctly.

Thanks again!

[Toby 2,938]

Any more flaming, and we'll have to take care of it the other way. 

Kindly calm down and stay on-topic.

[oxide 15]

If all the teams make challenge 6 in a couple of days, is there any chance that you will give challenge 7 earlier?

[Goges 7,262]

3 minutes ago, Ocsid said:

If all the teams make challenge 6 in a couple of days, is there any chance that you will give challenge 7 earlier?

No, the next challenge will be published after challenge 6th's deadline. (so it will be after 23th, October 2020, 17:00 UTC+0)

[neel123 64]

Well played

[neel123 64]

I love this game especially because of events like PS

Edited October 18, 2020 by neel123

[Uh-Oh 99]

Congratulations to my team!

[Person_Random 4,991]

I have read a lot of comments about the tricks being luck-based. However, I myself would have to argue that tricks are not exactly luck-based; you need to know what combination would allow you to get a certain height and velocity and then apply it using physics, therefore making it a quick thinking and physics-based contest over a luck-based contest.

Of course, there will be some who disagree. Because of this, I am thinking of making a newspaper article dissecting each and every challenge of the Parkour Survival Contest and determining whether the trick in question is luck-based or physics-based. Whenever the contest concludes, if someone could send be some unedited clips of their tricks, that would be highly appreciated. Thanks

[Uh-Oh 99]

9 minutes ago, Person_Random said:

I have read a lot of comments about the tricks being luck-based. However, I myself would have to argue that tricks are not exactly luck-based; you need to know what combination would allow you to get a certain height and velocity and then apply it using physics, therefore making it a quick thinking and physics-based contest over a luck-based contest.

Of course, there will be some who disagree. Because of this, I am thinking of making a newspaper article dissecting each and every challenge of the Parkour Survival Contest and determining whether the trick in question is luck-based or physics-based. Whenever the contest concludes, if someone could send be some unedited clips of their tricks, that would be highly appreciated. Thanks

its science 

[Person_Random 4,991]

2 minutes ago, Uh-Oh said:

its science 

Agreed, science wins. However, the only issue at hand is sometimes the science can be unclear. It's not pure physics problems after all... 

[Uh-Oh 99]

Just now, Person_Random said:

Agreed, science wins. However, the only issue at hand is sometimes the science can be unclear. It's not pure physics problems after all... 

it probably has history and math mixed with it

[neel123 64]

1 hour ago, Person_Random said:

I have read a lot of comments about the tricks being luck-based. However, I myself would have to argue that tricks are not exactly luck-based; you need to know what combination would allow you to get a certain height and velocity and then apply it using physics, therefore making it a quick thinking and physics-based contest over a luck-based contest.

Of course, there will be some who disagree. Because of this, I am thinking of making a newspaper article dissecting each and every challenge of the Parkour Survival Contest and determining whether the trick in question is luck-based or physics-based. Whenever the contest concludes, if someone could send be some unedited clips of their tricks, that would be highly appreciated. Thanks

How about you create a team and try to do challenges , that way you yourself know if the tricks are lucked based or physics based? That will save you a lot of time.

Like the saying goes , " Easier said than done".

s = ut + (1/2)*a*t^2 if that helps

[neel123 64]

13 hours ago, Person_Random said:

Agreed, science wins. However, the only issue at hand is sometimes the science can be unclear. It's not pure physics problems after all... 

Science can never be unclear , its just we as humans lack tools that can help us determine things that we haven't found yet. Everything that happens in this world can be deduced scientifically.