event [RESULTS] YouTuber battle

[Mr.Spark 240]

When will Freeze SE throw away its cover?

[r_S.B.A1 0]

@tank7 You have to pay if you want to be mean on the game 

[Dopamine 2,161]

2 hours ago, Mr.Spark said:

When will Freeze SE throw away its cover?

The skin is exactly what you SEe.

(Pun intended ).

[tank7 320]

10 minutes ago, r_S.B.A1 said:

@tank7 You have to pay if you want to be mean on the game 

I am f2p casual guy.

[numericable 2,375]

They should disable the bundle after the first day next times.

[NikmanGT 4,362]

11 hours ago, At_Shin said:

??

But my way was pretty much the only "low-risk"- "high reward" option. During the last 3 days of this event it had become clear that Jumper would emerge the winner. His team did win by a good margin. It was not at all risky to purchase his bundle at the last moment and reap more benefits than players of other teams who lost.

Players who grinded from the start had a 1/6 chance of their team winning. Players who multed successfully like me took very less risk but still got better rewards than those who grinded 5000k stars from a losing team (well, us mults didn't get the skin, but that's fine).

Actually, Shin is correct here. In this case, I repeat, solely in this case, Jumper was winning by a good margin overall, it was not a close tie between 1st and 2nd place which would lead Jumper to lose if few people bought his bundles just for the purpose of multing. 
I am sure that seeing Jumper win, many people did buy his bundle on the last day, and I was noticing the drop in average which was considerate but not that much in terms of his rivals, so he still secured a clean victory. 
In any other similar events, let's say the top 1st and 2nd team have average of approx. 2.7k and 2.71k respectively. So even a small amount of people buying Team 1's paint can drop its average and make the Team 2 win, but it did not happen here.

46 minutes ago, r_S.B.A1 said:

@tank7 You have to pay if you want to be mean on the game 

Actually no, whether you're a buyer or not, you can still post your negative feedback however you wish as long as it doesn't violate any rules ^^

Constructive criticism is always appreciated. It makes the devs, CM or whoever reading the posts, that yes, the user did not just write profanity words and abused overall but instead took some time and genuinely wrote what he actually thinks is wrong with the update.

[DestrotankAI9 1,513]

5 hours ago, At_Shin said:

Chances of this happening were low - I believe - which is why buying the winners bundle at the last moment was a low-risk option.

Well hmm, I would never be so trusting of people not to try to sabotage  As I say, 50 buyers from Team Waider could have changed the outcome in 5-6 hours if they had really wanted to, and there were no counter-mults from Team Jumper. But I suppose you might be right to say "low-risk" rather than "high-risk" as I said, as it would hardly be worth it for players to try to do that really, unless they just wanted to mess with things for the fun of it. But it would cost them real money and time to do so, so ye it probably wouldn't have been that likely.

Although at the start of the contest however, we didn't know how close (or not close) it would be coming up to the end - it could well have ended up very close, making it much more uncertain which team would win. Also, the devs may have not disabled stars for the final days as they chose to do - which would have obviously made sabotage much easier. So we only knew it was "low-risk" (if you could say that), at the end. At the start, we couldn't be sure this method would work out so well - but it seems in the last few days the odds looked pretty good. (Of course none of this would matter if you were happy to miss out on the event, if turned out that the #1 and #2 teams were too close in the final days.) A player who chose a team from the start could be 100% sure of getting a reward which was almost as good as the winning team reward if they work hard enough, and also have a chance to be on the winning team too.

Also, for a free player who isn't earning tankoins by any extra methods - 1k tankoins is still a lot. So if there was any risk of sabotage, that would hurt a lot if you ended up paying that and losing lol. There was absolutely no risk of sabotage for the rewards you worked from for the stars - if you put in the effort, they were 100% guaranteed - but you could miss out on 15 extra Ultras of course compared to winning team mults :P

EDIT: Also forgot to say - if you bought in the final evening there was also the risk the website may have not updated with your stars when you earned them. From past experience of Tanki's websites before I know you should leave an extra day or two - but I hear things were all good this time anyway :)

Edited February 15, 2022 by DestrotankAI9

[Lennard 3,270]

@JumperCongratulations mate, well deserved!

[Marcus 17,295]

16 hours ago, LambSauce said:

No way he didn’t buy stars from the shop.

He didn't.

[Dopamine 2,161]

2 minutes ago, Marcus said:

He didn't.

Give that man a medal!  or something...

[Mr.Spark 240]

9 hours ago, frederik123456 said:

The skin is exactly what you SEe.

(Pun intended ).

So modern freeze is supposed to wear clothes because it freezes itself

[numericable 2,375]

8 hours ago, Mr.Spark said:

So modern freeze is supposed to wear clothes because it freezes itself

At first i really didnt like the skin, i was thinking it was a 1/20, now i do think it is a 10/20. Not so good but not so bad either.

[Eon 111]

My rewards from opening 99 containers and 45 ultras. SE skin is not that bad tbh. Congrats to @Jumper and everyone who won and got these juicy rewards

Spoiler

 

Spoiler