declined Start over after legend

[alkyng 3,080]

On 12/19/2022 at 5:09 PM, Me0w_XP said:

Right. I agree with this. This entire idea seems too meaningless as ranks beyond Legend are essentially just a badge of time spent in the endgame. Devs should be adding actual updates and balancing stuff instead of wasting time on this.

This idea isn't time consuming, just text.  Also it's not too meaningless, in real it's meaningful. That means you have finished tanki 2 times + Major (for my case). You finished Tanki 1 time + WO5.   

[Me0w_XP 523]

On 12/19/2022 at 9:20 AM, firety31 said:

This idea isn't time consuming, just text.  Also it's not too meaningless, in real it's meaningful. That means you have finished tanki 2 times + Major (for my case). You finished Tanki 1 time + WO5.   

I understand that, but it's also just a somewhat confusing overhaul and not at all feasible once you hit the legend rank many times over.

[oOo.Aryan.oOo 968]

On 12/19/2022 at 7:39 PM, Me0w_XP said:

Right. I agree with this. This entire idea seems too meaningless as ranks beyond Legend are essentially just a badge of time spent in the endgame. Devs should be adding actual updates and balancing stuff instead of wasting time on this.

  You have my 100% support.

On 12/19/2022 at 8:02 PM, Me0w_XP said:

I understand that, but it's also just a somewhat confusing overhaul and not at all feasible once you hit the legend rank many times over.

Yeah , at first I thought this guy was  joking,  but I think he is damn serious about this stupid idea. My advice leave this idea or just ask developers in the topic given  below if they want to make some changes in the nomenclature of the subsequent Legend-Rank Current system.

 

[PirateSpider 1,489]

On 12/18/2022 at 10:32 PM, frederik123456 said:

Probably more practical than the original idea, though I still fail to justify the need for the change at all, as it wouldn't serve any added utility and would just be more confusing to understand.

 

 

On 12/19/2022 at 6:09 AM, Me0w_XP said:

Right. I agree with this. This entire idea seems too meaningless as ranks beyond Legend are essentially just a badge of time spent in the endgame. Devs should be adding actual updates and balancing stuff instead of wasting time on this.

Oh I don't really care if it gets added or not in all honestly. But if it does get implemented, I'd rather my touch on the idea than having to call someone legend 82 times or whatever.

My main concern is to make sure these players aren't able to play with low ranks. It may be common sense now or whatever, but in the past, I've seen similar ideas suggested, and someone asks a questions or voices their feedback regarding this issue, many times the OP would be like "why should that matter?"

[oOo.Aryan.oOo 968]

On 12/19/2022 at 9:49 PM, PirateSpider said:

But if it does get implemented

First of all , It will never get implemented.

On 12/19/2022 at 9:49 PM, PirateSpider said:

My main concern is to make sure these players aren't able to play with low ranks. It may be common sense now or whatever,

Why , do you know how Matchmaking works , it works on GS and SOMETIMES higher ranks players are matched with lower ranks when less people are online (which is just 1-2 hour after the server restart)

[PirateSpider 1,489]

On 12/19/2022 at 8:46 AM, oOo.Aryan.oOo said:

First of all , It will never get implemented.

Why , do you know how Matchmaking works , it works on GS and SOMETIMES higher ranks players are matched with lower ranks when less people are online (which is just 1-2 hour after the server restart)

No, I'm talking about something much worse. Like legend recruits being able to constantly join a normal recruit battle.

On 12/19/2022 at 8:07 AM, oOo.Aryan.oOo said:

Yeah , at first I thought this guy was  joking,  but I think he is damn serious about this stupid idea. My advice leave this idea or just ask developers in the topic given  below if they want to make some changes in the nomenclature of the subsequent Legend-Rank Current system.

I recently learned that you're supposed to post genuine ideas, not ideas that are all about jokes. Also, I don't understand why you're so bothered by this idea and determined to get it declined.

[oOo.Aryan.oOo 968]

On 12/19/2022 at 10:29 PM, PirateSpider said:

Also, I don't understand why you're so bothered by this idea and determined to get it declined.

Because this idea is a joke and moderators kept it so we can laugh on it.

[PirateSpider 1,489]

On 12/19/2022 at 9:02 AM, oOo.Aryan.oOo said:

Because this idea is a joke and moderators kept it so we can laugh on it.

Honestly, I've seen worse.

[Dopamine 2,161]

On 12/19/2022 at 6:02 PM, oOo.Aryan.oOo said:

Because this idea is a joke and moderators kept it so we can laugh on it.

While constructive criticism is always welcome, please do not mock others for their suggestions.

Every idea made with the intent to improve the game is appreciated.

[oOo.Aryan.oOo 968]

On 12/19/2022 at 10:45 PM, frederik123456 said:

Every idea made with the intent to improve the game is appreciated.

I respect this statement but this idea doesn't respects this statement.

[NikmanGT 4,362]

On 12/19/2022 at 10:32 PM, oOo.Aryan.oOo said:

Because this idea is a joke and moderators kept it so we can laugh on it.

Kindly do not spread such misinformation. Every idea is somewhat tended to make the game easier. It is not logical to hide the ideas of the players, unless it violated any of the Games rules or the forum Rules. The opinion you have on this topic might not be shared by someone else, and vice versa is true. Nobody should laugh at someone's else idea, but instead respect it. You can always ask someone in a polite way as to why they thought of making the topic, and maybe you can get to know a different outlook on the game.

[alkyng 3,080]

On 12/19/2022 at 7:07 PM, oOo.Aryan.oOo said:

Yeah , at first I thought this guy was  joking,  but I think he is damn serious about this stupid idea. My advice leave this idea or just ask developers in the topic given  below if they want to make some changes in the nomenclature of the subsequent Legend-Rank Current system.

So you see the current legend ranks are better than my realistic idea? I think my idea makes sense. I believe the developers wont implement it, not because it's stupid, but because they have crossed their way with the current meaningless Legends. Many players will get upset after seeing their legend rank shrinking.

So I suggest to change it to a new name , and apply my idea on it!

On 12/19/2022 at 7:19 PM, PirateSpider said:

My main concern is to make sure these players aren't able to play with low ranks. It may be common sense now or whatever, but in the past, I've seen similar ideas suggested, and someone asks a questions or voices their feedback regarding this issue, many times the OP would be like "why should that matter?"

Oh now I understand, but as I have said in the previous page, legends will still play only with legends!  Also even if I meant the other meaning, developers just basically wont implement it. Currently legends playing against recruits just because the lack of players, you wont see them play with recruits at climax hours!

[alkyng 3,080]

On 12/19/2022 at 9:01 PM, NikmanGT said:

Kindly do not spread such misinformation. Every idea is somewhat tended to make the game easier. It is not logical to hide the ideas of the players, unless it violated any of the Games rules or the forum Rules. The opinion you have on this topic might not be shared by someone else, and vice versa is true. Nobody should laugh at someone's else idea, but instead respect it. You can always ask someone in a polite way as to why they thought of making the topic, and maybe you can get to know a different outlook on the game.

Thank you. But I think the discussion is going well, as long as he said stupid for the idea not me!

[oOo.Aryan.oOo 968]

On 12/19/2022 at 11:35 PM, firety31 said:

I think my idea makes sense

No it doesn't. (Don't quote me on this, I want to end this here)

[PirateSpider 1,489]

On 12/19/2022 at 11:35 PM, firety31 said:

Oh now I understand, but as I have said in the previous page, legends will still play only with legends! 

Um yeah, you already said that.

On 12/19/2022 at 10:50 PM, oOo.Aryan.oOo said:

I respect this statement but this idea doesn't respects this statement.

That doesn't make any sense. It's an idea that passed moderation. Meaning it hasn't violated any rules.

[NikmanGT 4,362]

You guys just cant have a normal conversation, can you ?

[NikmanGT 4,362]

Disrespectful messages will be removed

[PirateSpider 1,489]

On 12/19/2022 at 10:03 PM, NikmanGT said:

Disrespectful messages will be removed

Eh, don't think I've said anything rude in this topic. Just suggested that if a certain someone wanted people to stop quoting them here, then they should simply stop replying here. Also told them that they can't simply stop discussions from happening in this topic since that's really up to the mods and higher ups.

[alkyng 3,080]

Back to the topic, so the idea in conclusion will be:  Legend21-Colonel, this format.  With definitely a new name for Legend, to not make some confusion or some angry from players as their ranks are shrinking intensively (for my case from legend 10 to legend 2)

If it's good developers will implement it, if it's not that good developers wont implement it.  I don't know if I'm allowed to do a poll in my topic, definitely this will not determine if my idea will get accepted or not.

 

Well, I can't. So I will put a link of just a quick random poll!

https://take.supersurvey.com/poll4637159xdC9848c8-145?s=res

[NikmanGT 4,362]

On 12/20/2022 at 6:19 PM, firety31 said:

 

Try to edit your main post, you might see an option to add a poll to your topic.

[alkyng 3,080]

On 12/20/2022 at 7:09 PM, NikmanGT said:

Try to edit your main post, you might see an option to add a poll to your topic.

Doesn't work, tried to create a new topic here and it doesn't have poll options. Seems polls aren't allowed in this section

[Incorp 2,084]

On 12/21/2022 at 12:09 AM, NikmanGT said:

Try to edit your main post, you might see an option to add a poll to your topic.

Actually in my experience, polls for I&S topics are disabled.

 

Ps wasnt aware my post was toxic sorryy

[PirateSpider 1,489]

On 12/20/2022 at 8:34 AM, Incorp said:

Ps wasnt aware my post was toxic sorryy

Which post?

[alkyng 3,080]

On 12/20/2022 at 7:34 PM, Incorp said:

Ps wasnt aware my post was toxic sorryy

No problem, in real I haven't seen many posts because I was asleep. Generally I'm happy with any comment on my topics, but moderators do remove!

[Incorp 2,084]

On 12/21/2022 at 12:36 AM, PirateSpider said:

Which post?

Removed