valid Idea for Assigning Player-Role in MM Battles

[oOo.Aryan.oOo 968]

These days there is a mismanagement in the structure of team in battles, you always end with a team which has more defenders than attackers or vice versa. You rarely get matched with a perfectly balanced team. The balance between Defender , Support and Attacker is totally messed up, which ultimately destroys the fun , frustrates skilled players and at the same time, wastes time of players.

 

So what we can do  is along with considering the type of Turret as well as Hull, GS Score and Rank, a 4th MM Criterion should be introduced which is Role. A Player should be asked about his/her general role in the battle which He/She will be going to play. For Example , Assign me a Random Role , Attacker, Defender , Support etc. So with the help of this data a Perfectly-Balanced team can be created for MM Battle. Of course sometimes there will be deviation in number of Defender/Attacker/Support , In that situation the player who had chose Assign me a Random Role will get that particular role (as a suggestion) in order to maintain Team Ratio and will ensure a fair playing experience to each and every player in battle.

[NikmanGT 4,362]

Valid

But players don't always like to stick to one role, I myself like to attack most of the time but will switch to a Defender when the situation gets dire. 

I think MM should always have the option of a carefree and free from restrictions game. Of course, there are people who defend, people who attack and some who support, but that's their own will and mindset and not something assigned to them.

[DragonKnight 414]

This isnt a bad idea, i like the logic of this. It makes sense