declined Change to Rank-Up Rewards

[curseuAARON 15]

I think the reward of 1 container for ranking up isn't worth the effort to get. You can just get them from daily missions which you can knock out in a game or 2, where as ranking up takes hours of gameplay for higher ranked players, and for what? A chance to get good rewards, but usually just 1000 crystals, which becomes pretty useless after the first few ranks of the game. Rewards should either be a flat rate, gradually increasing the higher rank you are, or a new kind of case that has better rewards, like the weekly container. They always hold 5k crystals (don't know why they reduced it) and a bunch of other useful consumables. It would still be less and less useful as you rise in rank, but its more substantial and consistent than the current system.

[Maf 32,300]

Declined

We do not accept ideas for adding/increasing rewards or bonuses.

[yuvraj007 302]

On 4/26/2023 at 10:49 AM, Maf said:

Declined

We do not accept ideas for adding/increasing rewards or bonuses.

bruh, atleast relay back a core message to the developers (1 container is not a worthy rankup reward)

You can't keep declining valid concerns from players based on certain "rules"

Not the first time someone complaining about rankup rewards

[NikmanGT 4,363]

On 4/26/2023 at 2:12 PM, yuvraj007 said:

bruh, atleast relay back a core message to the developers (1 container is not a worthy rankup reward)

You can't keep declining valid concerns from players based on certain "rules"

Not the first time someone complaining about rankup rewards

We already did that in the past when this similar idea got posted a couple of times by players. But the thing is, this idea solely depends on the marketing team, all we could do is forward the idea and it has been done previously.

[Maf 32,300]

On 4/26/2023 at 12:42 PM, yuvraj007 said:

bruh, atleast relay back a core message to the developers (1 container is not a worthy rankup reward)

You can't keep declining valid concerns from players based on certain "rules"

Not the first time someone complaining about rankup rewards

There's a reason why that rule exists. The suggestion is basically to give players more free stuff. Developers know that everyone wants to have more free stuff — this is not new to them. They also saw all the feedback from the patch note topic when this change (1 normal container instead of crystals) was originally announced, and I remember all the hate it received, so forwarding the same thing to them for the 100th time does not help.

The problem with all currency-related ideas is that it's not up to player to decide how much in-game currency and other rewards they earn. This is governed by the game economy, which is continuously analysed by an expert in the developer team. In the current economy, developers have concluded that a single container is a fair reward for ranking up. If the situation changes and devs find a way to increase player bonuses, then rank-up rewards or other bonuses may be increased.

So while the issue is completely valid and I completely agree with it, suggesting to increase rewards is pointless.

[yuvraj007 302]

On 4/26/2023 at 12:56 PM, NikmanGT said:

We already did that in the past when this similar idea got posted a couple of times by players. But the thing is, this idea solely depends on the marketing team, all we could do is forward the idea and it has been done previously.

Great to hear that you guys forward ideas to them, even though they don't listen to the community.

 

On 4/26/2023 at 1:45 PM, Maf said:

In the current economy, developers have concluded that a single container is a fair reward for ranking up.

best developers ever

 

On 4/26/2023 at 1:45 PM, Maf said:

So while the issue is completely valid and I completely agree with it, suggesting to increase rewards is pointless.

Next time someone raises a duplicate concern/idea, atleast tell him/her that it's been already forwarded/suggested to the developers in the past, instead of merely saying "declined etc"

Atleast the person won't feel bad. cheers.

[Spy 14,694]

On 4/26/2023 at 1:16 PM, yuvraj007 said:

Next time someone raises a duplicate concern/idea, atleast tell him/her that it's been already forwarded/suggested to the developers in the past, instead of merely saying "declined etc"

Atleast the person won't feel bad. cheers.

We never intended to make you or anyone else feel "bad" for sharing ideas. Our way of declining ideas may come across that way, but we are open to rephrasing our responses to be more considerate. Thank you for your feedback!

[alkyng 3,080]

50% percent of getting a fool 1000 crys after ranking is HORRIBLE in real

[Cleric 1,385]

On 4/26/2023 at 2:49 PM, Maf said:

Declined

We do not accept ideas for adding/increasing rewards or bonuses.

Classic. And as expected.

I still remember this reason is keep being used when players argue gold boxes completely lost their value because of how 1k crystal is nothing in the current game economy, and suggest increasing the crystals drop from it.

And that make a lot of sense, so as this one.

[curseuAARON 15]

On 4/26/2023 at 12:49 AM, Maf said:

Declined

We do not accept ideas for adding/increasing rewards or bonuses.

Lets say that hypothetically, there were suggestions allowed for these. Would it be a logical change to instead have the container gained be a weekly case?

[Maf 32,300]

On 4/27/2023 at 7:00 PM, curseuAARON said:

Lets say that hypothetically, there were suggestions allowed for these. Would it be a logical change to instead have the container gained be a weekly case?

Honestly, anything instead of the current reward would be logical. A single normal container for a rank-up is just ridiculous. I remember back when Legend ranks and the 40k rewards were first introduced, it seemed quite reasonable, and some people, who were already in double-digit Legend number, actually had the audacity to complain that they didn't receive rank-up rewards for all their previous Legend ranks.

Then we had the series of updates that doubled and then quadrupled the amount of experience given, and suddenly the 40k reward seemed a bit too good, because even by playing 2 hours a day you could get a free 40k reward on a weekly basis. I knew a nerf was coming, but having it nerfed down to a single container, and then nerfed further by reducing container rewards, was just a complete joke.

I don't know what the reward should be, but it definitely needs to be more than this.

[curseuAARON 15]

On 4/27/2023 at 9:34 AM, Maf said:

Honestly, anything instead of the current reward would be logical. A single normal container for a rank-up is just ridiculous. I remember back when Legend ranks and the 40k rewards were first introduced, it seemed quite reasonable, and some people, who were already in double-digit Legend number, actually had the audacity to complain that they didn't receive rank-up rewards for all their previous Legend ranks.

Then we had the series of updates that doubled and then quadrupled the amount of experience given, and suddenly the 40k reward seemed a bit too good, because even by playing 2 hours a day you could get a free 40k reward on a weekly basis. I knew a nerf was coming, but having it nerfed down to a single container, and then nerfed further by reducing container rewards, was just a complete joke.

I don't know what the reward should be, but it definitely needs to be more than this.

So will it never be changed because suggestions on how to make it better aren't allowed? Or are they're plans for maybe changing it someday to something better?

[Maf 32,300]

On 4/27/2023 at 8:47 PM, curseuAARON said:

So will it never be changed because suggestions on how to make it better aren't allowed? Or are they're plans for maybe changing it someday to something better?

It can be changed at any moment based on developers' ongoing monitoring and analysis of the game's economic situation. We just don't accept ideas for it. Same thing applies to all the other rules in this section.

[Deceptive-Hope_EN.PL 162]

On 4/26/2023 at 11:45 AM, Maf said:

developers have concluded that a single container is a fair reward for ranking up

XDDD The funniest thing I have heard in the last few days. I am wondering how low their IQ must be to think that giving only 1 container which literally always give 1000 crystals instead of thousands of them like 20k or more will be more "fair reward".  The truth is that this ISN'T fair reward. Now middle-ranked and high-ranked players, especially Legends get almost nothing for rank up'ing and now that thing is worthless!!! 

I guess 80% or more still hate this update. Me too!!!  

[PirateSpider 1,489]

On 4/27/2023 at 10:00 AM, Maf said:

It can be changed at any moment based on developers' ongoing monitoring and analysis of the game's economic situation. We just don't accept ideas for it. Same thing applies to all the other rules in this section.

Hmm. What if instead of just increasing the rewards, you unlock a new set of missions?

I guess we can call these "main missions"?

And completing these missions you get rewards?

[Maf 32,300]

On 4/29/2023 at 9:08 PM, PirateSpider said:

Hmm. What if instead of just increasing the rewards, you unlock a new set of missions?

I guess we can call these "main missions"?

And completing these missions you get rewards?

[PirateSpider 1,489]

On 4/30/2023 at 6:31 AM, Maf said:

True. But what do you really think? If you think its good, then I can post the idea. If not, I wont bother.

[Maf 32,300]

On 4/30/2023 at 8:59 PM, PirateSpider said:

True. But what do you really think? If you think its good, then I can post the idea. If not, I wont bother.

Regardless of what I think, we literally can't mark that idea as valid because it would violate I&S rules.

Devs have a hundred different ways to make rank-ups more desirable and more rewarding, but they won't implement any of them unless the game economy allows it.

[PirateSpider 1,489]

On 4/30/2023 at 1:25 PM, Maf said:

Regardless of what I think, we literally can't mark that idea as valid because it would violate I&S rules.

Devs have a hundred different ways to make rank-ups more desirable and more rewarding, but they won't implement any of them unless the game economy allows it.

Hmm. Ok.