Jump to content
Forum Sections
-
Developers' Information
-
- 2 571
- posts
-
- 1
- post
-
- 178
- posts
-
-
General
-
- 3 380
- posts
-
- 29 502
- posts
-
- 9 436
- posts
-
Game Violation Reports (15,783 visits to this link)
-
-
Off-topic and Creativity
-
- 168
- posts
-
- 179
- posts
-
- 1 624
- post
-
- 18 124
- posts
-
-
eSports
-
Official eSports Website (10,821 visits to this link)
-
Official eSports Twitch Channel (10,403 visits to this link)
-
Official eSports Discord (10,382 visits to this link)
-
-
Special
-
- 1
- post
-
-
Who's Online 3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 666 Guests (See full list)
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
The idea is nice, but I doubt this would really work - the more players you get on a battle field, the more "various" decisions, yes three maps will eventually end up with one with the majority of votes, but some could prefer yet another map to play, to a point if you really want to give the freedom to choose the next map, then you'd need to show all the options, thus all the MM maps, otherwise it's not a complete free poll if not all the options are presented. Then you also need to take into account the players leaving and the number of simultaneous players at the same time on the server. That's a lot of factors to consider -
@NikmanGT Yes I wrote the proposal myself but a little bit of Gen AI was used for formatting and final touch up. -
Lets just say that there already was a successor project for TO which was suppose to be a replacement for it, that being Tanki X. And although that project was met with unfortunate circumstances, there is no guarantee that TC will be some sort of saviour. Frankly, its possible that TO will survive longer than TC. As for whether TO will be cannibalized by TC , thats hard to say ahead of time. I personally will never play both, simply because I dont see a reason to play two games that have the same core mechanics. That was the thing back in the day with Tanki X as well, even though it was all futuristic and tried to differentiate itself, in its very essence it was just another TO game. We will see if TCs nostalgia will carry it long enough through the initial hype or if the players will simply return back to their tried and tested TO accounts they spent years upgrading. -
TO pIayers shouId be demanding that Aiternativa makes sure that TC doesn´t canibaIize TO in regards to pIayers. TO pIayers shouId aIso demand excIusivities for TO: Iike ODs, Drones, Augments, Grenades, TesIa, Gauss, Striker, Juggernaut, etc. And no, these are not aII the things l don't Iike about TO, l Iike Striker, Juggernaut, Striker and Juggernaut. Like they say, be carefuI what you ask for... TO pIayers. Do you think TO has a Iong future? l don't believe it does. For that reason, l thinks TC should be treated as a reboot of TO. Also, if they Iaunch TC as a complete, fully deveIoped game from the start, it could steal too many pIayers away from TO. It wouId be better if TC is introduced graduaIIy, piece by piece. l think many F2P pIayers AIternativa Iikes to feed to high ranking Buyers wiII prefer TC. l pIayed TO l think from 2016 - 2019; l'm pIaying again and l'm not Iiking many things about TO. l'II IikeIy go to TC when Iaunched, even if they reIease it onIy with Smoky, Iike l'm suggesting.
-
This is absurd!!! The contracts are so expensive that you have to spend 26,000 rubies. Even worse, the gold contract is only worth 50 energy. This discourages players
-
-
Community Management
No members to show
-
Administrators Online
-
Helpers Online
