Ye, it can't shoot through walls. That's when you lag.

They're already going to change the sounds for each gun and hull. True, they can add some icon for better aiming, but I enjoy the current situation better. It's more interesting and fun.

True. . . it's actually quite easy to know what you got destroyed by.

Then probably Emerald. Those Thunders will pick off at your Armor- not to mention splash damage. Well this would be my choice for you since you seem to struggle against Thunders.

But wouldn't: Player1 Destroyed (Burned) Player2. please both sides? They please: 1. The people who prefer the word Destroy to be still inside the phrase. 2. The people who want a more detailed description.

Oh true. But I wasn't meaning those 5 second drawings. I was looking forward to people who actually took time with their drawings. The ones that added detail etc.

How about it would still say: Player1 destroyed Player2. However, the difference would be the description would be in parenthesis. That way it would still keep it precise, un-confusing, and understandable, but yet add your suggestion so that we'd know what gun killed whom. Example: Firebird -> Player1 destroyed (Burned) Player2. ------------------------------------------------------------- That way it would still please the people who want to keep it original with the ''Destroyed'' because not only are they used to it, but it's easier to comprehend in my opinion. It's easier to use the same word so you know what happened to your teammate or enemy in one glance- or not even. With the Destroyed word omitted, it'd be a bit more uncomfortable in my opinion. This would also please the people who are in favor to this suggestion. So it's a win-win situation, no?

Precisely. So maybe some can be detailed descriptions along with a hand-drawn map of it along with its props etc. Some may be good at hand-drawing, some at Computers, and some typing their own article of what the map they're thinking of consists of etc. If they do this then they can attract a bigger crowd, more submissions, and more popular map. I actually like big maps, but not something like Dusseldorf. Maybe something like Serpuhov, Kungur, and Bobruisk. However, those are just a few.

Oh nice. I guess it doesn't have to be coded or in 3D either. Some people can simply give a drawing and give detailed descriptions maybe for the people who don't want to download/install any fancy tools. That way we can include everyone so we don't miss out on any key ideas etc. that they might hold- the people who can think of good ideas, but don't have the ability to implement them currently. But true, nice idea. I see the list of maps that are playable, but only few are actually played.

That. . . can be true. And remember because of the new update, it's possible for people like me still with M1 equipment to go against these guys.

If you already have a speed hull like Hornet, and don't like going up against a Thunder, then my opinion would be to get Emerald. However, if you use a Viking-Mammoth and would like to enjoy a different gameplay- one that relies more on speed, then buy Wasp M2. I'd say wait until Micro-upgrades before buying things. . . . .it might bring about a different view on things.

In that case. . . . . . I'd better go on stay on Tanki Forums! :D

15? :blink: What if they were all Mammoths. . . .I doubt anyone could respawn/move.

I sometimes don't like Ping-Pong because the enemy is so close to you. Lol! Especially if they're a Freeze and they can just come over to your side any time. :o Gives me that adrenaline. . .

When you are grouped into a Team, aren't you all technically ''friends?'' Each teammate already tries to protect their own teammate and kill the enemy automatically. So this update just made it worse, no?

Possibly.

Well, I'd say both weapons are good with Hornet. With Mammoth it won't get good until M2- and Mammoth definitely does not fit Isida. So if you want to alternate between both weapons, then you'll be using Hornet most of the time. The easiest weapon to use would be Isida- and not only can you be an effective killer, but your healing ability will land you big points as well. I'm not saying that Ricochet is bad, but it's very difficult to use. You're not supposed to shoot it like a Smoky unless the enemy is right smack in front of you. If you know how to use the ''Ricocheting'' ability very well- as in hitting opponents who you can't see, bouncing your ammunition off of walls or objects and hitting the enemy with good accuracy., and like using Ricochet, then you can get that. Ricochet is very good at M2/M3. I think if there was another Re-balance, I'd use Ricochet as my primary gun also. Oh I see. I'll get it then. I usually use it in TDM, but since the latest update, I'll be able to use it more in CTF. If you can use it right, then it's still optional. You don't actually need it.

I'm pretty sure that'd be in Russian, not English. I've never once seen English speakers actually devise a plan because the majority are Russian-speakers.

It's not broken- it just got nerfed by a big amount. The Ricochet gun is a flexible gun, and you can't just shoot it like a Smoky. Find your angle, and magic~ You got a kill. You have to be smart with it and know when and how to shoot. The majority of the people however, think that in Tanki Online you just shoot straight- probably because Ricochet is the only gun with such an ability. That's why people say it's broken in my opinion.

Actually, one of the biggest reasons for getting it is because of the fact that it's purple. Lol! However, will it last me to the Lieutenant Colonel- Brigadier ranks? If not then I may get Isida to M2- it's quite tempting.

This also increased drugging- at least it did to the battles I play in.

What would suck is if both bases were that color and you had the enemy flag and got lost. Then you wouldn't know which base to go to, get lost, and heck, you might just be returning the Enemy's flag and going the wrong way. Lol.

1. Unfortunately, I think this Topic will get closed and told to post on Feedback . . . . .this is an interesting topic however. :) 2. So more interesting maps. . .I can understand that, but what I'm really looking forward to is interactive environments. I think that will give a very big difference to the maps. The least they can do is moveable doors maybe? Tanks can push through them and all. So do you mean as in World-Of-Tanks maps but minimized to be right for Tanki Online? That'd be mighty interesting. :blink:

I agree with you. No matter how hard a group of M0-M1, they won't have an easy time dominating M2-M3. And the Noobs who join just waste the spots. . . . It's a nightmare without Drugs. I'm glad I got another batch of Drugs from dailies, but how long will it last? :mellow: I understand the pain . . .it sucks when those Noobs arrive and your team already has enough noobs. Then you can't Team-kick or ./vote because ./Vote doesn't do anything and Team-kick doesn't happen because like someone else said about, 40-60% of your team are already noobs which don't team-kick. Let the Noobs verse their own kind, and let the Pros rival their own kind. And yes, this topic was to discuss our opinions on it, right? So it is good that we're posting our opinions here, hollow reasons/views or not, they can all be replied to and changed. I agree with ya, and I don't think WO1 can battle with Generalissimo yet. . . or before this update that is. -_-

How big of a difference is Railgun M2 from M1?