don't worry i'll let robbie have all of u xxaxaxxaaxxaaxxaa

I hear your in love with robbie? :wub: :wub: :wub: :wub: hhhhhhhhhhh axaxxaxaxaxaxaaxxa

dang she hot xaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaaxaxaxaxaxaxa

I was just wondering if anyone here has ever used it and how long it took?

-- -- -- -- what a wonderful christmas present! :rolleyes:

This was my christmas present http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=186492&page=11&do=findComment&comment=3309064

I do remember, except I didn't join higher-ranked battles nor did I ruin the game for others. This doesn't relate? To me, a WO1 on my team is equivalent to me on a team with Generalissimos. You are a WO4, and how would you like it if a bunch of sergeants showed up on your team with M0 Firebird/M0 Wasp/No paint? "If he wanted to join the game, he joined"... Then how come I won't join a Generalissimo battle with M0 Wasp and ruin the battle for my team? And deal with mults on my team? Ok. Next time I see you in a battle, I'll join your team with M0 Wasp and then you can come back and tell me how you feel about what I did. I decided to join that battle, true. But how many battles are from WO5 to Colonel? Not a lot. And that's not including the people who have the right rank for a M2 but don't have it.

Ok, I'm selling my house.

I am the cheap man who bought a kit. Ok. They wanted me to have a faster tank? The first battle I used Freeze/Hornet. Second battle, Thunder/Viking. Third I used Mammoth... There were enough Hornets on our team so idk what you're saying. As for kit buying, not my problem that the other players can't afford one.

how do i play

I know I cannot force them, and everyone starts with a low rank/low combo. But did that WO3 really not find a battle up to WO3, where he had a chance of doing better?

I'm not saying that everyone has M2/M3. I mean that say, if there's a team battle up to WO5, make it a requirement to use a M1 combo or something. And not everyone will be as capable as me? Then why would they join? Do they not have any consideration?

I am writing from account @FC_BayernMunchen So I was playing some short sandbox CTF's. The rank limits were . Midway through, a warrant officer made a very stupid decision to click the "Play" button in the lower right hand corner... First of all, hello, use your damn brain. If you're going to play with lieutenants and majors, bring a M2 combo, not your noob M0 Thunder/M0 Hornet. I don't care if you're actually playing, trying to cap flags, or even drugging, but seriously, just leave. He didn't do a damn good thing to my team and I later switched to Mammoth to defend. I was waiting forever for the downvote thing to show up, but it never did. Here is a picture of this horrible mult: So, I just wish that Tanki could change the rank limits or at least make it a requirement to have a certain M combo to join specific battles. Like in the battle mentioned above, only M2 combos would be accepted. To relate this to the title and what I said above, I think it's BS that WO5's can play with Generalissimos. Even if you're using M2 Isida/M2 Mammoth and healing everyone, do you not realize that a M3 Isida/M3 Mammoth would be more effective than you?

Which is better, Twins M2 or Smoky M2?

Hornet is more speed than protection. Hunter still has speed but with a lot more protection. If you use short-range turrets, then Hornet. If you use Rail, then Hunter.

I don't think you need a NSBP to make a NSB. So I'm going to assume that you won't need anything to make a "pro battle".

I don't really care about micro upgrades... But honestly I'm not paying 50K crystals to upgrade Prodigi's Rail protection by 1%.

don't use screen cast o matic... i lag like hell when i use it

ok, thanks to everyone who helped, i changed my wifi channel again and my lag has gone down a bit close thread please

first time i got this: second time: then --------- ok.

Insult is insult according to who? Society? The moderator? Shouldn't it be the victim who decides whether it is an insult or not?

But what if I wasn't offended? It can't be considered an insult if I wasn't offended or insulted!

Ok, before you tell me to post it in the "Ideas and Suggestions" thread, I doubt a lot of you regularly check that thread and second, I'm not sure if that thread is for discussion, which is why I created this thread. So a lot of us know that moderators are present in the server chat most of the time, and if, maybe, a user "insulted" someone else or maybe they flooded, then the "Player ___ has been banned for 5 minutes. Reason: __ . [insert weird arrow here] Rules". Well, I have a new idea. Say a user called Infected.with.Skill (one of my alts) says to another user, FC_BayernMunchen (just assume that they are two different people who don't know eachother). Infected says to FC, "Ur a big noob y u so dumb?". usually Infected will get a 5 mins ban for insult from the moderator... but what happens if FC is not offended or insulted by what Infected said? I think it is wrong, in this hypothetical situation, for Infected to be wrongfully banned since he did not break a rule!! Edit: lol whoops, i forgot to add the suggestion So in the future, I think that the chat moderator should ask the user, "were you offended?". If yes, then ok, ban. if no, then no ban!

The brigadier icon looks epic next to your name :D

That's what DarknessRising (flae) and other ppl do