Was ook niet (van mijn kant) vervelend bedoeld.

Opa, vader en een zoon. (de opa is óók vader en de vader is óók zoon)

Een makkelijke dan: het is (alweer) groen, met een beetje geel, het zit op een paal en het piept.

Eigenlijk niet echt grappig....

Bob de Bouwer, gok ik

...kabouter Plop met vier blikjes Red Bull achter de kiezen?

All those downvotes..... :( :( :(

Didn 't realize you were Dutch/Flemish too. Got it! ;)

True, but I have a hard time to imagine skilled players using Twins a lot. Indeed, maybe if they are really only interested in high scores. For the rest Twins is IMO way too easy too handle and thé perfect tool for noobs: lets give it an A+ for boredom.

Well, AureumSanguinis you 've got an amazing sense of humour....

Better not use mouse controls at all. Mouse controls may work well for a newbie, but at an advanced level you don 't stand a chance against the precision and speed of keyboard controls. Yes, keyboard control can be a bit tougher in the beginning, but it will soon pay off: period.

So you officially quit and on the same time you will play very less lesser than less? Hmmm...interesting paradox...

If I had the crystals I would choose this kit too. All I would want out of this kit are M3 Hunter and M3 Ricochet. (first paint I 'm interested in after using my battle proven Prodigi is Clay: swap Shaft protection for Rico protection) Away with that ugly Lumberjack! I don 't need protection against close-rangers! (well, I often do but I like to fool myself that I don 't... ;) )

Even fighting a half battle can be lucrative :)

Time to make "leaving" really LEAVING. Why not introduce a voluntarily kind of ban for someone who wants to leave? Than you would have two kinds of leaving. The permanent leave and the temporarily leave (the latter can be something with a minimum of three months till a year or even more) - permanent leave: the account will never be accessible anymore at all - temporarily leave: the account will be unaccessible during the time period given by the player This way we can give a proper and decent goodbye to players who are actually leaving forever and we can wish good luck to the player who really takes a period off for whatever reason. We can do without these kind of three nooby "permanent" goodbyes.

Fair enough! Still won 't get me playing Hammer again though... :( (and :P ) Anyone else who wants to give it a try?

That reload really has put me off. It slows down gameplay way more than it does with for example Ricochet. (Ricochet shouldn 't run empty, only in emergency situations) With Hammer in action it feels somewhat similar to Smoky with lesser range: but nice! However after this short burst of activity, you have a long break of inactivity when you have to reload: not nice... With a weapon like Thunder and even more in my experience Smoky you can get into in a sort of "gamers trance", because these turrets keep on going and going, and you are in full charge of the next shot. (following this logic Twins should be the optimal turret to achieve that "gamers trance", but this state also requires some tough grind: tough grind and Twins...nope :D ) Hammer constant reloads do snap you out of that state of full concentration IMO. You need some concentration for the number of shots left, but that only worked as a further distration in my case. I would like to have a genuine Hammer player show me that I 'm completely wrong! Playing with it is not a must, but as it is now it will really only just gather more dust and rust...to my disgust... :(

I really don 't like Vulcan. That 's all.

No surprise: it 's even OP without drugs.

Vulcan??? Ok, nobody 's perfect... :D

Yes, that 's right: doesn 't mean it 's better though. (not at all)

Good question Viking 's M3 fully micro-upgraded speed is 9.0 and protection is 315. It has more armour, but it is slower in top- and turning-speed. Hunter 's M2 fully micro-upgraded speed is 9.5! and protection is 248. Seems like a very decent hull to me! 315 - 248 = 67 HP less armour: substantial, but not an earth-shaking difference either. I would personally go for the one-hull solution: Hunter M2 with micro-upgrades, rather than having a second medium hull like the Viking M3 without, or with just a few micro-upgrades. It 's effective IMO to invest the crystals you save, when you focus on one hull only, in micro-upgrading that one hull. (not on M1 hulls, but from M2 it can be worth it: especially with very late M3 upgrading equipment like a Hunter M3) And if you manage to upgrade a parameter like protection fully on a M2 Hunter, you do get a pretty decent discount on M3 Hunter. And a decent micro-upgraded Hunter M2 is 100% capable enough to get you to the next M3 upgrade. It should be. Just be sure to take full advantage of the MU-discounts!

Just a simple mixed breed cat.

Meet me one happy (happy? yes for me! :P ) day with M2 Wasp-Rico... Till than I 'll be waiting patiently with M2 Hunter-Rico. Greetings,