-
Posts
3 055 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Quarks
-
#glitchFTW, and that SUCKS for you.
-
IKR, but nice topic idea.
-
I thought you were going to link it to TNATN, not a clan. Do you know how to link?
-
That moment when you are shaft, and you have a great, high spot. and then your teammate pushes you over the edge.
-
Decent basis ignoring the grammar and spelling. Nice attempt.
-
#MultFTW
-
We hire for quality control. No point in having a bad writer. It gives a bad rep.
-
*coughTWGcough* Seems like a knock off for only NA players. But congo on going out and making your own paper. Also, article should take more than one week to write.
-
Thanks, if I can afford it
-
I am popular? Never knew that. The reason I am 9/10 is that I simply don't have that much reading time. But when I do get to read, zone out. I could read an entire day so long as I have good books.
-
I voted for Broly. 16 Brendan 10 USA 9 Looks like a new interesting club Um, ah, I do a lot of stuff. Shellie and I are in same clan.
-
So many things I want to upvote, but alas, I have reached teh dreaded quota.
-
git rekt. Do you know the reporter Phoenix Warbird? yeah, GIRL, deal with it. You are incorrect, and others in the forum, such as Smexy Giraffe.
-
That moment when you find yourself chatting more with your friends than playing the actual battle. That moment when a high ranked player does not know what is wrong with using m0 hunter, smoky, and green in the middle of a full blown match.
-
M2 hunter or spark. I have m2 XP and I am already planning on m2 fire. This is considering there is a 50% sale and I have enough for 2 things.
-
stop spamming that/
-
m2 fire for christmas
-
I have noticed that. A lot. On chat. If anyone is on.
-
[Issue 44] The Dumbest Anti-supply Arguments of All-Time!
Quarks replied to sonofchrysalis3 in Newspaper Archive
Not a bad article. The premise of it had a lot of potential. I thought this would be a joke and create nonsensical and pointless jokes about drugs, such as "Drugs are stupid, so you are stupid". But nope. You took a different approach. You attempted to break the ice by dropping name bombs and jokes in. Not a bad idea, but there was a bit much. Finally, the article was too long. After the third one, it became a little hard to concentrate, as many of the points you used earlier are used again. I think even you got bored with it, seeing as the lengths of arguments became shorter. Please note this is not in contradiction to what you are saying, but simple comments on the article. That made no sense. Not criticising the material. There we go. -
lol
Jump to content









































































