This is the best article in issue 34 hands down. +1 keep up the good work @hogree

Nice

A Human.

SMART cool downs.

beaku Am glad that you are still here since we can elaborate more on our points. Let me introduce to you noam chomsky since he is not just any scientist infact he helped in pioneering The A.I field. he is the author of the book syntactic structures where he single handedly invented context-free Grammars .. now what is context free grammars ? they are structures where one of there uses is describing the structure of modern high level programming language (backus naur form as an example) because back in the 40's people were actually writing programs with 0's and 1's it was a tedious and consuming task to write Programs in 0's and 1's that required alot of training and time to write very primitive programs , then came assemblers .. come Noam Chomsky with his theories, modern high level programming languages (lisp ,fortan , c , prolog ...etc) Were born. His theories are fundamental to the theory of computation specially program correctness. You said he denies facts yet you presented none. OK , i said earlier that the aircraft analogy is irrelevant here but it seems you didn't understand the hint. so in repling to this childlish logic let me explain the following. A.I in it current form was established out of a conference in Dartmouth college in 1956 The gang of 5 herbert simon ,marvin minsky john mccarthy , allen newell, arthur Samuel. It was after ww2 when the us government had tons of money to spend and any scientist who could Sell his ideas like a marketing pro was assured to get funding so they gave it this catchy name A.I !!!!!!!!!!. by the way they thought they can make strong ai programs in a 3 month Workshop back in 1956 :lol: . Now i made this intro because it's essential to the last claim you made and relevant to the topic of A.I As a whole. Herbert simon one of the A.I founders made the following claim back in 1965 "machines will be capable, within twenty years, of doing any work a man can do" :lol: . Marvin Minsky of the A.I founders made the following claim back in 1967 "Within a generation ... the problem of creating 'artificial intelligence' will substantially be solved" :lol: . Marvin Minsky again in 1970 "In from three to eight years we will have a machine with the general intelligence of an average human being" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Now what is the relation between Noam chomsky and those A.I founders??!!! they actually know each other and noam chomsky was one of those who gave them a reality check and exposed There marketing tricks (past and present) to be nothing more than inflated hubris. not just that back in the early days of A.I research Behaviorism was one of the likely paths to explore A.I . chomsky Works in linguistics decimated the Behaviorism trend by explaining it's fallacies and saved A.i from this useless path , he and other have showed time after time that the claims made by A.I scientists Are unattainable backed by scientific evidence. So in this case the ones that are making outlandish rogue claims are the founders of the field itself Not Chomsky. now let us take a pause and look back why do respectable people like the founders Of the A.I would make such claims ... well you will not find the answer in A.I itself ... you will find it In the politics of funding research projects. One last note the analogy of the aircraft as i recall was made by lord kelvin who said lighter than Air vehicles are not possible .. is this what you are referring to ? if so i read about this long Time ago he didn't provide any evidence to support his claim unlike noam chomsky and others Who provided scientific evidence to refute many of the claim made by A.I pinheads! A side note i am a graduate of computer engineering i actually had to study A.I and was fascinated back Then by A.I scientists claims only later to find out why they made such claims in the first place. Singularity u say xaxaxaxa.

m1 and m2 microupgrades got a boost , how about m3 ? !!!

R u going to release it on tanki birthday ?

WOW wow wow ... tanki unity looks epic :D

Glad that my post was insightful most of them have rico or isida m3 and viking tank with good protective paint and They normally get good scores !!!!

^ congrats on ur 600th post Tiny.

Hull

Rail

At least 20% of gissmos don't know how to move there turret!!! yeah i was surprised to know that too :huh:

light

Well we are speaking about A.I here a science and he has drawn a conclusion of the possibility of a singularity as a result of advancement in A.I , he needs to provide scientific evidence for this conclusion For his argument to be valid !!!!!. He is not mine , he is for the whole world to share and the fact that you don't know him speaks volumes about The quality of the last debate!!! since he is very relevant to the debate subject matter. Hypothesis needs evidence for them to be either supported or refuted the correct answer was given by noam Chomsky, beaku argument argument is "am right , you will see!" and he is telling us that things will happen In 80-100 yrs for sure, now that is not a sound argument!. I wasn't questioning the debate results or the debate judging committee! i was refuting a statement He made... which as i said in the first post the singularity is pure sci-fi. and i provided evidence to support my statement.

Do you have any evidence to support your argument regarding singularity inevitability. The analogy of the aircraft here is irrelevant to say the least and certainly you don't have the credibility to Proof or disproof that the singularity will ever happen. science is different from faith kiddo. So what do we have here ... the argument of Noam chomsky who has a context-free grammer named after him,(Chomsky normal form), is a cognitive scientist , linguist ...etc whose works has helped many scientific fields including A.I and the argument of Beaku who from his writing style we can deduce that he is under 14 and know very little about computer science let alone A.I. I think Noam chomsky won this argument.

Spoken like a 10 yrs old. have you watched the video i provided ?? and do you know who is Noam Chomsky ???!!!! watch at 15:00

Ohh i didn't read sirogo second post .. my bad. "@beaku ........ The real trouble would be when singularity is reached,........ " Do you watch or read too much ray kurzweil ??!!!... the singularity is pure sci-fi!!!!!!

مشكورين علي مجهودكم الاجابة علي سوال تخمين الجائزة صعب جدا

Have you been using your garage supplies lately ?!!!! cause that is the only context i can understand what your post means!!

OMG!!!! That was long!!!!!!!! Hillary 2016 :P

KK .. i have bumped your topic enough for one day , we continue later maybe!

I think you didn't get what that means!

مقالة ممتازة. لكن هم قتلوا الفولكن في هذا التوازن .