Brilliant, it might be useful under certain situation, it frees one hand so you can eat a donuts while playing Tanki...

Hunter is a very good hull with a top notch OD, very useful and efficient in many close combat for attack and defence. His versatility is unique which make it the one hull to constantly keep an eye on, and in any battle ground mode and maps. It outclasses viking since the introduction of the ODs. Only drawback is that it looks so ugly.

Because you are a camper? ? as it is not OP enough... 1/ and 2/ have improved - on the 24th.

We knew that this new gauss alteration was a lose-lose situation both for TO and the buyer.

Unfortunately what is on the test server do not always reflect the final true parameter that you will see in game. Sometime, very often, the effects are exaggerated. I was asking for speed and acceleration btw.

For light hull titans is very useful (not when hornet is around though), I did resit the blast of 2 bombs under its nesting dome. "Titan’s dome no longer protects from freezing (slow-down) and burning (after-burn) effects but still decreases heating damage;" Lol, after-burn will give twice to four time the damage of the direct shoot. Hunter is a buff indeed it is like Hornet OD for a 8 seconds (= 40% of Hornet OD (20 seconds)). Hail Hornet and his little bro Hunter. "I have a feeling that "resistance" is a cheaper version of "immunity"," yeah or/and it unlocked at different ranks. First Resistance at low rank and then Immunity at high rank.

1/ I use that alteration for a very specific purpose/game-play and I did spend crystal for that too. I am not gonna buy another alteration or another hull (i can;t afford to do that every time there is an update). Plus others hammer alts will also be affected in the same way. 2/ will see, even with the visual effect (slow and whitish color do not necessarily means that is is the same mechanics at play. 3/ So you know how these are connected? 4/ thanks but I need more than that.

So this is about the camper debate then? I don't thin so, I have seen all turret on Hornet. And yes we do get in the middle of the battle. OD and hull are not linked you can't look at them separately, if your Nerf one you automatically Nerf the other. On a funny note, I just realised that Hunter OD does have 8 seconds of the Hornet OD effect so it is 40% like Hornet OD now. ? Hunter is so OP man.

You assume well, but they will be the same. So 8 in total, they cover most of the mechanics that are not direct turret damage. Now you have to wear freeze protection module and then also the freez alteration on your hull, this will increase the time in your garage when you want to change equipment during a battle. I was expecting one against splash damage. hum.

No Hornet OD immunity? Players will cries. "JGR will get 50% protection from after-burn damage" / Heat Resistance/Immunity - Dang, my Dragon's Breath alteration gonna be useless now (it is only Hunter now, but then JGR too...). What about the freezing effect of Dictator's OD? Is it prevented by Stun immunity or/and Cold immunity/resistance? Does Lightweight Construction increase speed and/or acceleration? Why Heat Immunity and Heat Resistance? same question for Cold.

Use Hornet instead. They said it is OP.

With higher HP, heavy hulls are in better position, so it is less of a problem. Titan OD is useless against Hornet OD, this is indeed in the spec of this OD. A MK7+ Hornet+DA+50% module might be equivalent to 8000 health but still stay at 2000 HP against another Hornet OD. Jokes on him. I will never ever stop defend it, Hornet can be one-shot more time than you think, plus it very sensible to impact force (can't properly aim when under attack), so it needs a disruptive OD to keep people playing it. It is not silly, it is love.

That is true, all turrets benefit from it, therefore is a good OD. Which is the point of this OD. Really frustrating indeed (for its enemies ?). Words of advice, when you see one activated ... hide!

Well light hull are weak, you need to hide. If you have a titan then it is less of a problem.

Removing the current stars will disable features (and the rewards associated) based on stars and will not change the player mindset: selfish player will stay selfish, and players with desire to collaborate will still do. These mindset can only be slightly influenced and not reverted.

Chateaux (close enough)

There is no stupid question, but sometime some question cues a stupide answer.

Same paint but with more power and a sticker gold star. Obviously.

the drone but with more power and a sticker gold star. lucky you.

play with HTML5

Yeah, sure give the gold medal to all participants. Seriously, I don't see the stars being an issue in the battle I play at FL. I disagree, people in the losing team will get nothing, and that will be counter productive to the battle. Each type of battle generate different level of score, your idea means that for each of them devs will have to balance the level to get each stars. I can see lots of disagreement form players on what represent the fair level. More rules and more processes? No thank you. The amount of stars required to get to the top price is so huge that only a few players are that desperate to get there, this long term goal is overruled by the short goal which is to place top to get more crystals. Should we remove score and crystals too in the hope to get correct battle?

Countless of these ambitious companies fail and only a few succeed. How many local shop became a giant superstore company? Not many. How many of this small companies are also bought and got absorbed by the big ones (e.g Facebook and google) ? TO do not have this ambition, they clearly said that they want to stay small, local and stay alive. Advertising it to make you visible, if your are not visible people will not know you exist. It is expensive only big company can afford that, so 15-20K is the number you will experience for a very long time. TO was a revolution in 2009, nowadays it is quite common technology, the golden age of TO is in the past unfortunately. If TO under flash was successful, TO must have done one thing good, they would be able to to that with HTML5 with time. Flash is dead btw. You might have not noticed but HTML5 does a lot more stuff than Flash, enhance the difference in CPU usage and other parameters. HTML5 is not not a true copy. I like it when you put the blame on the soviet mentality, it just show how narrow minded and clueless you are. Most of all it just show how frustrated you are. Have a deep breath, close your eyes and visualise a forest.... and lower your expectation. So many grievance toward TO, and you are still here, do you atone for something?

?️ he is buying his second castle in France...

Stars are a simple way to provide more stuff for players who contributed most to the battle (and/or play on regular basis). They are like a long term missions with bigger rewards if you complete it and small additional reward if you play as usual. They recognise MVP in a battle and those who participated to a minimum requirement. Being first is an incentive, having on top stars it does increase that desire to finish first. However current selfish attitude from players will still remain even if you remove stars (or change the way they are given - you did not change the player). And you should remove the crystals rewards too, give 100 crystals for each participant for example. This still is way better than crystals boxes falling from the sky. This is still a game with specific activity and goals and not a pure battlefield where you only defend your country.

I am sure that a small company like TO (who develop game for players with potato computer) will be happy/proud to be compared with the big corporate with 200 devs and with a massive load of money to advertise all year long.