until I drug and ram you... hornet-thunder is a terrible idea. They're way too easy to kill. Hornets are really only good with flamers, isidas, freezes, and maybe railguns. They just don't have the health to be useful with thunder or twins/ricochet (well, maybe ricochet...)

how would you aim the mortar? And secondary weapons on tanks aren't meant for shooting other tanks. They would just leave marks where there isn't any paint anymore.

for the love of god... NO! I hate all these 12 year olds who want to turn tanki into Call of Duty

the world? The earth will never end. Its too big (unless it gets engulfed by the sun in about 3 billion years). We, on the other hand, could go extinct, or close to it, any time a meteor gets close to the earth.

all I do, is if I know an isida is going to kill me, I shoot it right before I die, so it doesn't gain any health back from the tungsten slug that just punched a hole through their tank.

I just kill anyone who dares hit my tank

^what he said

:hunf: I know it won't do any damage.... Stupid idea. I think that we should have infantry and air support. the army men start with 5 health m0-m1 15- m2 25-m3 30. Their guns do minimal damage 5 hp - . Helicopters/Planes used for dropping bombs 60 hp -/ ejecting with the e button to get the flag they always respawn at your base with like 2 planes there... IDC if there lag. People would like that. At least I know I would. isn't the entire point of a tank to not get shot up by light machine guns or assault rifles... or small arms in general? 20mm Antimaterial rifles don't really do a whole lot to tanks, and only at a couple hundred yards away

^LMFAO blackbirds would get chased by Mig 25s and they'd stall about 30,000 feet below, and the plane is faster than any missiles anyways good god... if we had actually made F-12 interceptors.... *-*

is it just me or does that look exactly like a mammoth-railgun? also, the Fact that the aiming system is German is a moot point. Everything is from dozens of countries. Hell, the FN-SCAR is from Belgium. At any rate, every one of these tanks would be completely owned by the Merkava. Nothing beats a backwards Challenger (plus, it weighs like 102 tons)

what about an invisible paint? Not like... actual invisibility like the invisibility glitch, but like, making it blurred against the background (think James Bond's car in Die Another Day)

they're damn good tanks, and we have a hell of a lot more of them than most european countries combined. But the RF has like what... 20k tanks? In numbers, the RF would win even with 4:1 kill ratios for the Abrams. Also, most modern MBTs use rounds that are powerful enough to kill any other tank in 1 hit, os its really just a question of accuracy. And the US wins with both range and accuracy.

its all really a moot point, though... the RF could never sustain a traditional war with the US. They just don't have the infrastructure, and, to be honest, neither side's planes have really been put up against pilots/planes of the same calibre for decades. (Vietnam for the US, I don't really know for the RF, but I assume its been a while)

how many kills did you get? I can't see

I'm going m3 railgun m1 viking and Urban... god I love urban

past 200m, nothing beats a railgun, boys

its my tanki motto

PONG FOR THE WIN

Looks wrong.....*Vomits* :shock: :shock: DONGTASTIC! also,

here's how it would go down: AWACS designates an Su-35 as a threat, sends locking information to the F-22, which then fires an aim-120 radar guided missile at it, and the Su-35 is down before it even knows what the hell happened. The F 22 doesn't have as good of radar for a reason. Thats why we have AWACS... Russia doesn't use AWACS to nearly the degree we do. Also, the speed is a moot point, because all you can do at full speed is go in a straight line for about 30 minutes until you run out of fuel. pulling up/down 2 degrees at 2160kph is about... 20 Gs, more than either pilot could survive. The F 22 is actually also superior to the T 50, just because the T 50 isn't full aspect stealth, its engines still pump out a pretty noticeable heat signature. Same with the J 20. Oh... and that F 117 that got shot down was shot down because it wasn't where it should've been; above 10,000 feet. Stealth isn't some magical invisible shield of awesome. There are ways of beating it.

the gun on an A-10 weighs about as much as the main gun on a tank... its a 30mm cannon. Also, the armor piercing bullets on it can only penetrate armor on older tanks. Anything built after 1970 will be impervious to its rounds. On top of that, even on an older tank the 30mm armor piercing rounds can only penetrate at a specific angle and in specific places on the side and back of the tank... not the front, which is what you'd be shooting at most of the time. Its just a bad idea all around.

no, because the damage increase makes up for it... unless you're really unlucky and the other guy is really lucky

I went 58 and 3 in a game on silence last thursday... and I was on red team. It was just BLAM kill BLAM kill BLAM kill with my m2 railgun

twins on titans actually work pretty well, if they're upgraded to full... so do twins+mammoth.