i know devs can do that but... they actually trust this guy enough to let him know our IPs!?

let me just ask you one thing. you rather they incorporate a more common tank fitted rocket launcher..; or you rather they incorporate something that makes you feel like someone under orders of comrade stalin sent to war for the motherland? okay that was a joke, but anyway cannister was desgined for tanks BUT not to use against tanks, it's designed to be used against infantry. i thought you said that because infantry doesn't exist in the game there shouldn't anything to do with them? as pointed out by my 2 friends above... a mammoth is actually smaller than that stryker... ;) that was definately recol i felt. you might think that's how it works but... seriously, each one costs 15 thousand euros each, how could something so simple cost that much?? i wouldn't be surprised if it's actually an antimatter rocket. how else could something so small and light be so much more powerful than anything else like it...

yeah i know who he is. that guy doesn't have any skill at all. so definately equipment. if you get m3 freeze you'll be the one taking the 1st place when you play together with him

wait... you know my IP?

it's not really conflicting... he says don't buy M2.. cause m2 sucks because it unlocks the earliest of all m2s. I said buy it and get it to m3... because m3 will be better than any m2 you'll come accross at your rank

buy freeze M2 and use your 250k to MU it to m3

they already incorporated shotgun.. and so far all the videos you showed were by tanks several times the relative size and weight of a mammoth. how about one from the size of a wasp? that is not how i justified recoil. i justified recoil from the fact that a countermass is needed to counteract recoil from this sort of mechanics. (it's the pdf btw) the examples i provided simply act as proof that this sort of mechanics do exist. as for MATADOR... there is definately still a lot of recoil and sound and some backblast despite the countermass... I haven't studies exactly how it works but i know that because... i have used it myself. i used it as an example a few times because it had the highest recoil and sound of all the weapons i ever used. it's a bloody monster, destroys everything i shot at. i know where they are, i shoot at them and they die. others who hear me 10 footbal fields away think I commanded zeus to strike lightningbolts at where i shot at. no idea why it's classified as low recoil, that ain't true

it launches a rocket so it is a rocket launcher...

actually the RPG-7 was the standard handheld antitank weapon of the soviet union when it was at it's prime and this is a russian game so it makes sense that they'd incorporate one of the most common and symbolic rocket launchers. and remember, in the soviet union retreat is more dangerous that attack... so this does make sense for them. might be crappy for.. *cough* those who lost to vietnam *cough* yes it has backblast, but it's reduced. had it not been expelled by powder the backblast would be bigger. and stop telling me that it has no recoil. i never said it did. i only showed you RPG-7 because you asked for a rocket launcher that expelled the rocket by powder before the rocket gets ignited. you want one with better recoil and the same mechanics then how about RPG-16 and it does get expelled by powder before igniting, read properly...from wikipedia : The booster consists of a "small strip powder charge" that serves to propel the grenade out of the launcher; the sustainer motor then ignites and propels the grenade for the next few seconds, green is when the powder pushes it out of the launcher..; red is after it gets out the rocket then ignites

you conveniently missed the description in the the english wikipedia? MATADOR has the back end open too, yet it shoots it's projectile solely from pressure build up. back end open or not has nothing to do with now it fires it's projectile. oh stop giving excuses. you asked for a rocket launcher system that expels the rocket by a charge prior to ignition and you got it. you didn't ask for recoil.

my mistake, RPG-7 then

as mentioned above... you realise that many of the new features don't get announced in the english forums? we need to speak russian to discuss it in the russian forums

i can teach you that and 25 other languages... ;)

what about a guide to teach people how to communicate effectively in other languages in tanki?

depends on your definition... for me by better i was reffering to being shameless. this guy is sucks even at being shameless, at least tank40 was good at what he did

no, as i already stated repeatedly, it is so that it doesn't affect people behind it as much. any more details go read the part where i already explained it. i see smoke from hammer... i see smoke from magnum... hammer was created right before striker and magnum right after. it's clear that no smoke comes out of striker because it's not supposed to. M72 LAW does the tank even move back in the game?

there's already smoke, and it looks like the smoke from actual napalm burning on nothing else... if you want smoke rising from the top then that'd only make it unrealistic as napalm doesn't burn like that

let's see what's missing from my hypothesis that it works by powder discharge... we're missing a soft bang and missing your hypothesis... flames erupting from the barrel, smoke and flash coming out from behind... and a much louder bang

it is a rocket. it's a handdrawn sketch, not a photo. in the whole thing it clearly states that it is a rocket that will ignite after it leaves. you really gonna find your excuse just because he didn't draw a detailed rocket? there's no point in that because he already said it is a rocket. my boy, you should hear a bang too if it leaves directly from rocket propulsion. and the bang is a lot louder for rocket propulsion than powder discharge in case you're wondering thank wolverine for his example ;) exactly. it gets ignited the instant it leaves. not before it even leaves. you see the difference? and how does it leave the barrel before being ignited? powder discharge that causes recoil of course. no one ever said it has to be 10 meteres, it just has to ignite after it gets out. you just completely made that up. the powder discharge to get the rocket out first?

what a shameless way to trick people into watching your channel so you can get more views... even @tank40 was better

i don't and i don't have to. i just need to know one and that's enough to know that it exists also i don't really have a choice actually. my contract was terminated early because... anyway unless my country is officially at war i can't go back.

that guy just watched a few videos but has he ever fired one himself? also, had it been rocket propulsion from the start then it'd be like one of the photos below. either the flash explodes out from the front.. or it gets released from the back. clearly striker neither. i really don't see the point because i know already know the reason some rocket launchers have recoil. but I'll do it anyway.. although tbh i don't really trust what random people say on the internet. I prefer to experience it myself. there's also other reasons... it's inside that pdf actually. reasons like not giving away too much of it's position (with powder discharge you don't give away your exact position, they'll still know the general direction you're in though) another thing is the sound. with ear protection infantry won't get harmed, but it's not enjoyable either. there's also the heatwave... anyway my only experience with rockets was when i was doing something with the alpine hunters... maybe the special modifications are only suitable in the mountains and not anywhere else.

you sure you ordered them correctly? cause they don't seem to correspond. how is there even 9? i only quoted you 6 times nvm i think i understand now... okay for 1 - 3, yes i know it makes no sense, my examples are just as senselesss as how you think your video showing a tank firing rockets without recoil somehow prove that all tanks who fire rockets don't have recoil. proving only 1 doesn't prove every single one of them 2-5, they didn't design it, they simply choose to add an already existing design into the game. 6, they just take whatever design they like, cause does it really matter? 7, then either shut up about reality or stop using reality as a reason. you decide but make sure you stick to it 8, so.. as i said, you can't comprehend it so you just dismiss it as trolling cause it's not possible for someone else to know something you don't. when that happens just assume he's talking rubbish and it's not true

for the last time, showing examples of it without recoil doesn't prove that one with recoil doesn't exist. if i show you 1 picture of an american with 1 leg does it prove that 2 legged americans don't exist?? after all, it is exactly an american, and he ddoes have only 1 leg... i don't care what your video shows, because whatever it does, it doesn't prove that there can't be another one that has recoil. just because the game doesn't have any infantry doesn't mean that there can't be a tank in the game that is designed to work better with infantry support. does every game with a stealth bomber in it need to have enemies with radar so it can be invisible to the radar? because it was designed to imitate a tank that would be suitable to use with infantry protection. this is your game now? then stop using reality as a reason to say that there should not be recoil as usual you dismiss anything you're incapable of comprehending as trolling... so you didn't read... because countermass for rocket launcher is exactly what it was about

1. as i said, read it again properly. and by that i mean read the whole thing, not just see the part you like and ignore the rest. the 2nd variant is pouder charge first before igniting the rocket. due to the fact that noting comes out if the back of striker, it is clear that striker is the 2nd variant. 2. because you showed a different model. some of them have recoil, some don't. striker is one of those that does and that's why it has recoil. 3. are you sure about that? since when are youthe one who decides what people use each turret for? 4. wat