-
Posts
1 115 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Everything posted by ILiveOnTheChatBox123
-
-335
-
38,349
-
The point of this game is not simply to write a story, as you can do it by yourself. The point is where you read a sentence and understand it one way, write a sentence meaning one thing, and then afterwards you see how it was understood by others. If you do not enjoy such a game unlike the others that do, feel free to try a different game, or start your own game.
-
313.
-
-
TWNBH since in the southern hemisphere it is getting colder.
-
[Forum Game] Count, but avoid being number 13.
ILiveOnTheChatBox123 replied to DieselPlatinum in Forum Games
0. Player @spiderman1000 can never curse me using puns again. -
-339
-
#NoSpinSpinister @Spinister has not even been online to show up.
-
313 We aint' stoppin'
-
[Forum Game] This Topic Will Never Be Closed Because... (Attempt)
ILiveOnTheChatBox123 replied to ILiveOnTheChatBox123 in Forum Games
But it might if @E_polypterus keeps on giving the same reasons without any originality. -
Now the girls have a slide in their favor, help me win this back! 311.
-
#NoSpinSpinister Since I think this might be the first war that is one based on members more than posts.
-
TWNBH since none of you responded to my latest poetic chat piece.
-
312 I will give up sometime soon.
-
How about getting rid of the nuclear box (maybe replace it with a solar energy box) deleting Chernobyl might also help. I don't want to keep these industries forever, just doing anything too drastic when other industries are not ready yet will harm people. I mean government funds. Most real climate change intervention includes government money. A lot of that money is going to waste, but a certain politician called for a 3 trillion 'green new deal' which is a lot to much to not have negative impacts. Either the taxes to pay for such deals would stifle the economy, or it would get rid of government programs that people rely on to stay alive. A smaller amount is acceptable, not trillions.
-
Why does the game keep putting people with a gear score of 1000, up against people with a gear score of 6000?
ILiveOnTheChatBox123 replied to ME700 in Archive
If you have a suggestion to the game, you may want to submit it here https://en.tankiforum.com/forum/182-ideas-and-suggestions/ so it gets fowarded to the developers. This idea has already been suggested in the past, and you can read this topic to see the moderators' arguments: https://en.tankiforum.com/topic/384125-gs-based-matchmaking/?tab=comments#comment-6768691 I will try to answer this question on my own. Tanki earns its money from players that pay for better equipment. Therefore, Tanki needs to have better equipment having an advantage, and therefore they base MM off rank and not GS. Once MM is based on rank, Tanki needs to have multiple ranks in one battle to allow for a shorter wait-time. This is called a rank-spread. It is very possible for someone a few ranks up from you to have better equipment unlocked, and especially if they are buyers they will have a higher GS. I don't know why you have the entire team with a lower-GS and all your opponents have a higher GS, although it should occasionally happen, the probability o it happening often is quite low. Once the enemy team is a lot better, they will be able to dominate your team's base, and since all players spawn near the base, they will be spawn-killing you. If you have a suggestion for how spawning should work, you may submit it to the I&S section linked above. If this problem is only occurring in the HTML5 version, you can submit a report here: https://en.tankiforum.com/topic/384717-html5-bug-reports/?tab=comments#comment-6738738 -
The U.S. FDA would not allow a medicine to be legalized on the current global warming data. Obviously cars are warming the globe, but it might not be doing as much as thought. I still support a switch to electric-cars. However, if you place unjust restrictions on gasoline-cars, you may be doing more harm than a more gradual switch. I don't think its not real, I just believe that its overrated to some extent.
-
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sun-spots-and-climate-change/ Its pretty basic that there are other factors besides for human actions.
-
[Forum Game] Count, but avoid being number 13.
ILiveOnTheChatBox123 replied to DieselPlatinum in Forum Games
11. -
#NoSpinSpinister Since F41TH seems confidant of a shut-out.
-
Trade-offs for combating climate change are not harmless. Closing coal mines sends tens of thousands of coal workers into poverty. Banning non-renewable energy cars hits the economy hard, and will send more people into poverty. If funds that would've gone to save lives and lower the poverty rate are spent on 'renewable energy research' or similar programs, you may be killing people. While some trade-offs may be worth it, nothing is harmless. This is besides for the fact that we have no proof that emissions are the cause for a rise n average global temperature. While it may make sense, we have no idea how many degrees it is actually warming us by. Remember, in order to get a life-saving medicine to be legalized in the USA, you need to perform numerous controlled tests with a large sample size. Global warming is totally observational and not controlled. There are other factors that affect global temperature change such as sunspots (The sun is a mixture of gases, and sometimes the outer gases are the hotter ones, and sometimes they are less hot). I do not mean that we should trash our planet. There needs to be considerable steps taken to try to stop global warming. However, this does not mean that we have to factor in what you are losing, and how sure can you be of its gain in each situation.
-
[Forum Game] This Topic Will Never Be Closed Because... (Attempt)
ILiveOnTheChatBox123 replied to ILiveOnTheChatBox123 in Forum Games
TWNC since A-Z already closed instead.
Jump to content
















































