-780

ok, so you stop here? So disappointing, but not surprising.

If you have a selective memory about rank range from before the MM have a look here https://en.tankiwiki.com/Rank_limits Mult in MM? Yea right. Sounds like a 101 sore loser excuse to me. The threshold is for stars only, without it you would have inactive player just standing there and waiting for the end of the battle. Sounds like perfect plan for abuse, don't you agree? Plus plus with your termination battle system they will get the star in no time for nothing. :ph34r: 90 is high but possible. Stay in battle and earn those 90 score, if you think you can't get them, then leave.

Hot hair makes hot hair balloon fly, go figure. You are not listening. Patents can stop TO from doing one or all of your request for MM. The game company who patented MM, and spend lots of money to do so, wants to prevent other company to use it, and they might no even use all the patented stuff, but it is enough to stop other company. I'm in product development and there is stuff that my client want to develop, but there are sometime technical reason, regulatory compliance and patent that make it impossible for me to do. It is a possibility, anyway, you forgot that they could be other reason for TO to not implement your requested changes, they might like it as it is for reason that you don't like and don't understand. Till now it looks like TO do not want to implement: - early termination battle: there is obvious reason for that, especially with the current stars system rewards a lot more people would loose stars (both winners and loser). - smaller rank bracket: TO said that everybody should be able to play and they want mixed level rank in battle - those are the same since I started to play 3 years ago. - 3 minutes left: you can refuse to play that battle and leave, as far as I know there is no rules against that. This said, you have all the rights to not be happy and request these changes. This TO choices however could evolves if the pool of player increase significantly. So far I'm happier with matchmaking, it is better than the previous system, I guess you like mults, raiders and traps, as you did not denied it. Challenges is not problem for team play at all. So sorry to disagree with you on that one. Any effect bad or good would actually happens in both team. If it happens only in your team, maybe the problem is not your teammate (#just saying). Finish first 15 times is the toughest mission that is no surprise, but hey, no pain - no gain. You can still post against it as I have a feeling that this one will be changed, but most likely not as far as you want.

With railgun, when you are aiming at enemy tanker A, you press space bar but enemy tanker B shoot at you and makes your tank shift in his direction, and boom the shoot is released straight at tanker B and kills it.

That is sheer luck, not skills though.

Good idea, very appealing for drone that you can barely see as they are tiny.

Beautiful paints, i'm not a fan of the top one thought. :ph34r:

You could choose your battle yes, so did the mult, the raiders and the player setting map like trap to farm xp and crystal from your death. If you wish you can still do it in pro-battle mode, it is your choice to play MM or pro or both, not TO, they might try to give you candy to play in MM thought, but I'm pretty sure you are strong enought to resist. I don't need to be a MOD to make my own analysis and reach my own judgement, furthermore MOD have no insight on the dev works, they only repeat what is currently available (v-log, Wiki, news, patch...), explain what is not understood by players and also run some testing in battle to check some theory. I can do all of this and you know what...? You can do it too. A year that MM is operating, uncountable number of battles played with MM, has the battle rank changed since? Take a hint. In team mode you are in a team, do you not play as a team in a team? For the patent, you are too young to understand how it works, so i'm not gonna explain but they can make impossible one, more or all the possible improvement your listed. Just the fact that Hazel-rah mentioned it shows that they looked at patents in this area, at least they are aware of them. Patent is one of the many hurdles for improvement. Regarding the point of improvement, put yourself feet in TO's shoes and weight the Pros and Cons and ask yourself why they are doing it the way it is currently. It is like the Kick system why they are not implementing it. To me there is obvious reason not to add kick system.

Discord is not a game btw, so there is no such Discord player. This activity is meant to attract more player on TO Discord server, you know to make it grow and gather awareness. Such special activities already exist on the other TO com platform such as TO Facebook and TO Twitter or on TO mobile (parade of the beginner and the supply box). It certainly won't happen that often, can you see TO creating 4 animated paint and adding 2 new XT every 2 months or so? They will run out of idea for animated paint and available XT. Challenges are like additional daily mission, they help to get more stuff especially at the start. The crazy players that can't resist to play no-life for a cosmetic rewards, publish their progression on the forum and which to have time to recover can only challenge their original decision to act like this.

Before MM, the battle range was this wide already and MM till operate with the same rules. The fairness of strength cannot be achieved even with rank because at the same rank you can have player with strong equipment and other with bad equipment (or ill-equip for the map). The direction, choice taken by TO on MM is currently very clear, everybody should play - otherwise they would have reduced the rank range a long time ago. Being a weak or low rank is weakness for an individual, however it is a team game so you are not alone. Yes you are right MM is for filling, mostly the rank mix average is respected, their is always the odd out and people leaving. Yes there is a lot of suggestion for MM, but there is also patent made by other game company in that are that could prevent TO to actually implement some of those.

You thought right, he will contact you, be prepared.

A few were given in a giveaway on TO discord. I do not know if they would be more giveaway. You will have to go to discord to find out.

MM, you can discuss it here: Let's discuss Matchmaking However if you need more voices or followers to support you cause, you could write a compelling article where you explain the default and other aspect of it. And at the end you should expose your solution & improvement in details. ... One sided battles are due to many parameters and MM do not look at it the way you think. The system wait for many players to form a queue, then select 20 players based on ranks then create a random battles and send them there. The faster your ping the sooner you get there, if you use browser then your are more likely to get there 10-30 seconds after the guys with clients and mobile (they already have all the maps props). So who ever fish was in that list would be assigned to a team. As TO wants all age and old capability of player to be able to play in the same battle, you will find quite a mix and wide range of ranks. Consequently you can have one time all the druggers in your team, and another time equally split, it is the roulette. I don't think TO will ever provide a truly match battle even if they try hard, because it is not possible (too many factor and player will always find a way to workaround it), and they would be silly to try. Look at professional football and rugby tourney even good team can loose because they choose the wrong tactic, the ball bounced a different way, one player was injured, and one action can make the game gone one way despite all the effort. It is worse here because player can still leave the mid-game with the consequence we know. Of course there are options to minimise it and TO is working on it to a certain point. TO wants a mix of player in every team. .... Hackers are like the plague, and not only for TO, everybody game is fighting against them, it is a never ending story. To improve on your side you can be part of it and help by reporting. ... Haha Holy cow exist, but carpets on the forum don't.

Damned, I lost your contact on Discord. - Friend me :) Thanks, I was inspired for this part and knew what I wanted, the next is trickier.

That works too, :D no such "no kill rule" or "mir". War is war.

Not yet. When they announced the development for Androids it took a year to be released. For IOS, devs have not even told that they are working on it. Come back in a year and ask your question again.

OPEN low rank 1 000 000 crystals

Nice postcard, I did not know you could do such beautiful and neat stuff like that. Chapeau. By now you should know that it takes time for the CM to give rewards as it is all done manually especially when there is that many winners. Furthermore you and other needs to tell him what they want. I am curious which shot effect and animated paint you are looking for?

You are annoyed by kids asking to drop gold? :lol: I saw players dropping gold are right time, to win battle or revers situation. The current concept is better, more unknown.

I hear what you are saying, however GB is great for strategy making decision when that unknown battlefield quirks arise as you will never know who will go for it or not and when it will happen and where on the map (apart from one map). You don't know who from your team or the other team will get the bait. Winning is one thing, having fun is another one, and GB is part of it.

For the HOTY

Every morning I have Breakfast, I don't know why, it must be the habits.

You deny the players rights to chase for the GB? Killjoy. Grumpy tanker.