Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

DefkwargX

Advanced
  • Posts

    259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DefkwargX

  1. DefkwargX

    Let's Discuss Hunter!

    Nice take
  2. There are 2 battle modes that people play a lot in pro battles: parkour and XP/BP. You can chill, flex your skins and make friends in parkour, or if you have some supplies to waste, you can participate in ''parkour beefs''. just shoot someone to start it and the winner is who kills or flips the other first lol. What i meant to say is that parkour mode isn't restricted to just getting on top of buildings. I like xp/bp the most because only skill is required there (no supplies needed and no useless and additional deaths like in parkour)
  3. I think shooting someone while being in sniping mode will always apply the status effect to the enemy you shot, just like the armor piercing salvo for gauss
  4. DefkwargX

    [TPOD] related discussion

    Wth is this RNG ?
  5. Ask nikman to show you who insulted who first. Besides, I used words such as ''donut'', ''noob'' and related words, which can even be termed as cute to some extent. Yours were much harsher and had to be censored. I don't have a problem with people who are different from me. I have a problem with delusional and entitled individuals who feel that they ought to receive rewards without putting in adequate efforts. Yea, me too I've a lot going on in my life. For instance, I have a physics exams tomorrow but can still find time to use the forum and play the game. When it comes to RNG, you don't expect good things from normal conts except for crystals, supplies and rare/epic hull augments. Rewards of the legendary rarity are hard to get. To get good stuffs, u must open ultra conts and to get them you must complete missions. Tanki provides silly missions for us to complete to get Ultras. However, even if you opened them and didn't receive good rewards, it's not because of a mErCiLeSs RnG, it's because of the fact that you didn't open enough containers. You just proved my point of not managing resources properly by buying twins mk4. Trash update, fr and this is why you should count your crystals and spend them wisely. Nah, not the max possible. You wasted a part of your crystals, which you yourself admitted. You care enough to hate on this drone and its users though. What happened to the argument that one should accept people that are different from him? Told you about the resources management issue and this time i'm not even taunting you, SAVE your crystals. I currently have 1.4M crystals saved up on my main since quite some time. Did I spend them during this 30% off sales to upgrade stuffs? No. Not a single crystals. I know that I'm a non-buyer and I can't afford to waste my crystals. Imma spend them ONLY on 50% off sales. I sadly only adopted this mentality a year or two ago, which allowed me to improve my account. I came to the (fairly logical) conclusion that in order for your account to prosper greatly in this game, you can generally either be a buyer or a non-buyer who doesn't miss out on opportunities to get rich by grinding whenever there is a reason to grind. You can't sit back and relax, appear in the game once in a blue moon and then disappear again, then find faults with the game for having a bad garage, for example. You must put in the work required after having planned meticulously the way that you're gonna play your cards.
  6. Look at the name of the player who got the xt drone this time, haha
  7. I genuinely believe that you should have kept my last message (censor it if you want to) where I showed that guy how he has a problem of managing his resources, not because of my ego, but so that these chronic haters can also see how they often blame the game without thinking critically whether or not they were the problem or if the problem is really coming from the game.
  8. Yeah cuz you got caught. You employed the same tactic as someone yesterday, who ran and refused to read my reply when being confronted. Next time, don't reply to someone if you don't have the bcourage to read what he said and reply to it. It's crazy how the haters of this game are mostly just noobs who don't know how to manage their accounts properly and they rant on about the game as an attempt to cope, but end up running with their tail between their legs when confronted with facts and logic. This game deserves better players than them and it is this kind of players that should leave the forum so that people who are more mature can voice their opinions. There are many things wrong with this game, BUT there are many good things about it too, and what is sad is that these chronic haters just see the first part and deliberately choose to ignore the second.
  9. I refer to the 2014-2015 era as ''Old tanki'' because i started to play at that time. Can't comprehend that people were playing this game in 2009-2013... They must be dinosaurs lol
  10. DefkwargX

    Saboteur Drone

    Lmao, I think that he meant a screenshot or sth xD
  11. Dude, you can camp in a corner and kill people to come first in your team, while your teammates sweat to cap even 1 flag. I get your point but anyways, what I said was with respect to a specific context between me and opex and i explained it twice already. Cba to do it a 3rd time.
  12. So, you forgot the context again or you deliberately chose to ignore it this time? Opex was asking if it is fair if someone who played objectively well in a battle gets placed on the leaderboard under someone who didn't play quite as well as the former. He also found the idea of a p2w button fun (he was jk). I argued that the way that his ''injustice'' needs to be tackled is by changing the way that points are allocated to players in battles. Hence, someone asked me about this issue and i told him that kill-stealing is an issue which contributes to this ''injustice''. I also stated that idc, as i am in the top 3 in nearly every battle, if you took care to read the context. However, in hazel's case, this is a relevant and important issue. Care to read the context, fool. Can't wait for you to not take responsibility of this mistake as well.
  13. Well said. Tired of tryna make people understand this. Agree
  14. Yea, but opex found the idea of adding a p2w button desirable because of the positions of players on the leaderboard, which he deems as unfair but he seems to not show enough consideration as to WHY these players are placed on the leaderboard in this specific way. Addresing this issue will help to reduce this issue. Kill-stealing is an issue that is important and must not be ignored, imo.
  15. DefkwargX

    Esport Phone Players

    As far as I know, no. Esports players cannot play official esports matches from their phone and must use a pc or laptop. However, try to make this suggestion by making a new topic because who knows? Maybe it will be accepted.
  16. Well, sarcasm or not, I kind of disagree. I call this one what many people would often call it: a ''luck'' issue. For example, if you deal a considerable amount of damage to an enemy tank but your teammate deals the final shot, you can be mad but he's gonna get 15 score points and you're gonna get 5 points all the same. I get this problem often when I group with my friends in MM while using gauss with the armour-piercing augment. For nearly each salvo shot that i deal to an enemy, my friend gets a kill because he shot the enemy right after during the armour-piercing duration. This often contributes leads to my friend being on top of me on the leaderboard. Another example is in CTF, when someone takes the enemy flag and travels with it across the map but gets killed just before capping it. Then the selfish shaft/mammoth crisis who is just behind a cover next to the flag just has to press 2 and pickup the flag and cap it. The user who carried the flag will most probably try to make other attempts at taking the enemy flag but if he fails, the shaft user will most likely end up on top of him on the leaderboard because he is focusing on killing. The same thing goes for the picking of a flag in assault mode and taking it to the enemy base but getting killed just instants before capping it. You get 0 points for the effort that you made to sneak into the enemy base. 3 unfair examples, right? Well, I think that most of the time, it all boils down to the game mechanics. In the case of the first example that i provided, I find it ABSURD that if I deal 2999 damage to a viking but someone deals the final 1hp damage to him, he'll get 15 points and imma get only 5. The logical change he would be to award 15 points to the killer, yes, but also to award points proportional to the damage dealt to the ones who dealt damage to the dead tank. In this case, I would like to receive 14 points because of my huge contribution to the killing of the enemy tank. This will greatly reduce the injustice of kill-stealing with respect to the score. The 2nd and 3rd examples concern the same issue: poor allocation of battle points. Imo, points should be allocated proportionally to the distance one carries the flag in CTF and in ASL modes. What am saying here is in the case when one takes the flag, travels quite far, but gets intercepted by an enemy, killed and the flag gets returned, one should get battle points proportionally to the distance travelled with the flag. Of course, the maximum points that he can receive in this manner can be 30 instead of 79. However, in the case that he gets killed and a teammate of his caps the flag, the maximum points that he can receive must be equal to 79. Keep in mind that this is my opinion, which might be good in essence but practically unrealistic. My point is instead of just adding a ''button'', why don't you attack the problems to the source. Instead of thinking about fixing the ''unfair'' way people are being placed on the board, why not think about WHY they were placed in this specific manner? For me, it's the same as if you are planning on giving painkillers for life to a patient who needs a surgery to ease his pain while refusing to investigate whether or not he needs a surgery. I also wanna mention that I end up in the top 3 most of, if not nearly all of the time when i start a battle from the beginning in MM and i'm a non-buyer. Hence, i personally don't care who comes below me or on top of me as long as i'm in the top 3 because all that matters the most for me most of the time in MM battles is stars. But if you wanna tackle a problem, do it from the source. The imbalance in MM stems greatly from the lack of players which is preventing developers from making adequate changes to address the matter. I would like to know if tanki is making any moves to promote the game and if not, (if you don't mind me asking), why? I discovered tanki through miniclip, and so did my brother and a major part of tanki's all time playerbase, I believe.
  17. Unless you made your account really recently, I genuinely believe that if you're still ranting on about having a bad garage in 2023, then you have a skill issue when it comes to the management of your in-game resources. If you disagree, I am willing to engage in an in-depth debate about this because this is getting annoying.
  18. Dayum, dev really said ''enough is enough'', lmao. I appreciate your dedication to read forum posts and to reply to them, often in long paragraphs xD.
  19. DefkwargX

    Assemble a Tank

    Did you shake your head twice or do u have 2 heads?
  20. DefkwargX

    Not receiving rewards after completing the "encore" missions on the mobile version.

    Self-explanatory title. There is a blank space in the rewards slot. I wanted to know if more mobile players have the same problem. Even after completing them, I don't get anything. https://ibb.co/SQQ0632
  21. Free nick change is a really good advantage. I wonder why the donuts who nearly never miss an opportunity to criticise the game didn't reply to this specific part of the patch update. Clearly shows their one-sided behaviour.
  22. Fyi, i've an account which is at master sergeant and which has crisis maxed in it, and am a non-buyer
×
×
  • Create New...