Wait, are you actually going to dispute the fact that Railgun, Thunder and Smoky are the top 3 turrets in the game right now? Please show me objective evidence that this is so, list me your top 3 turrets and your objective evidence why you chose your top 3 and then we can move forward.

The reason why I called him a coward was because he was raging about me using paladin isida and was insulting paladin players and telling me to change equipment. He even mocked my k/d ratio, and in battle, I responded to him that it was a JG mode in stadium and I was the only one attacking, the rest were camping in the back like he was with hornet gauss. In that particular battle, nobody cares about hornet overdrive, everyone can see where the Jg is in the map.

You are incorrect. I clearly stated what kind of data it was necessary for it to be objective and not subjective, I literally listed 6 points. All of the people who are writing against me say hammer and tesla are good and cite no objective evidence, but just subjective feeling. They think hammer and tesla are good because they see them being used in battle. They offered no objective standard, and are attacking me. Kind of hypocritical if you ask me. I don't care which turret and hull are the best or the worst, I go by stats, and whichever turns out to be the best is the best. I've had 20 responses to me and non of them have debunked my claims, and they just cry for some objective standrad, when I literally wrote what the six components I use.

No, they are not real. It says I played with brutus 1.9 hours, with booster 3.1 hours and supplier 3.2 hours. That is literally not correct, I don't know where those numbers come from. Also the paints and exp I gained with hulls is impossible I played with hornet for 5 years without change and It says I only got a mil exp, And the biggest thing is, when you add all exp earned with my hulls or turrets, the number does not even come close to the total exp that I have earned as a legend 61 rank. But sure, you can try again.

sshhhh don't tell him, he thinks that numbers he sees on the screen on the website that even developers don't know exists, are real.

Do you play this game?? Like I have never in the last 5 years seen a player care if a team wins or not, or to help the team. One third of the players camp and don't care, another third cant even turn their turrets, and then a few people actually try and win the game.

Again, I see projection and strawman coming from you. My top 3 turrets in the current meta is based on objective stats, not about what turrets is the most used, I listed six points from which I gather data and determine the best turret. And again, you are making it like I am making moral judgements about team play and other things, when I am literally writing what other people respond to me. I never said team play is not important, I was responding to a person claiming that having hornet in the team was useful because of its OD. My response was that nobody picks a combo based on what team needs, but what a player wants to play, has upgraded, feels comfortable, or is useful for the map/game mode. No, I don't know what efficiency rating is, I don't look at my stats as they are incorrect. When I see my profile, there are many things that are wrongly calculated and listed ( e. g. which drones or hulls I use and how much exp I gained). Because of that reason, I stopped looking at the stats years ago, as developers don't care about fixing anything. I never said I knew everything, I just said that Tesla and Hammer are worse than before and that Railgun and Thunder are the best turrets currently in this meta, using stats and reason. Everyone else started crying, I guess because they have some weird fetish for tesla and hammer.

I never said it was a bad combo, I just said what you were using. I don't care that I am getting "cooked" by other people. The majority opinion is not always right, and actually I would say majority opinion is usually what mediocre people will side with so the conclusion is: What is majority opinion is usually wrong. Of course it is objective, when I literally listed the criteria in the comment above, what I consider to be objective evidence. So, far not a single player has debunked any of my claims about top 3 turrets, which was the basis for these whole discussion. All I saw were little digs and emotions. Basically, people acting like children. I don't even know what Efficiency rating is or how it is measured and I don't care. I finish top 3 every battle and I am f2p also with Brutus and just a few combos maxed. I didn't even play matchmaking until last year. I only played xp/bp. Wouldn't you say it was both? I mean Scorpion was OP when it came out and everyone was using it. You are acting like anyone cares for team play, and doesn't use the combo based on a personal preference. Yeah sure, lets see, Imma use scorpion viking because hey, every team needs one camper in the base and not because I want to play that combo.

You might not "stalk" other players, but I do. Last time I saw you in battle, you were camping like a coward with gauss hornet in in stadium JG mode. I keep my stats so, you are spewing nonsense.

Your evidence would have to be this: 1. Play every day, at least 7-10 battles for at least 7 days, in different modes, not just one mode 2. See how many players use isida and which augments. 3. How many players that finish top 3 have isida, in both teams 4. How many players have you seen use isida and get crazy good results, surpassing all of their teammates by at least 200-300 points. 5. Is there a lot of protection against isida that the players are using. 6. If there is a special mode for the weekend that is player for himself and not team play, how many players are top 5 with isida Then you collect data and there will be your objective answer, backed by stats of real gameplay.

1. My standard is objective. I base it on stats in gameplay for myself and for the players as a whole. By the look of it you don't even know what subjective and objective means in this instance. I was responding to people who claimed that tesla or hammer are still good turrets because they see them used in the battle etc. My point is that that is irrelevant for finding out if a turret is good or not. There are bad players and casual players who will use any turret whenever, and who don't even use forum or know anything about these turrets being nerfed or buffed. Secondly, when I set up a top 3 turrets in the game currently, they tried to counter my list, but then basically agreed with it, except for smoky, but even then they were feeling it a bit. 2. About scorpion. Yes I know how the games works, ofc Scorpion was going to be very good at the beginning as many players don't know how to counter it and didn't have protection. Still, it is evident that scorpion got a massive nerf, if anyone wants to debate that, than I don't care, I wont waste my time on lunatics. There is no way in hell scorpion is better now than it was a month ago. I don't care if scorpion is still usable, or viable, or good. My whole argument was not about good or bad turrets, but about turrets that players can take advantage of and get above average results in the game. My goal in the game is to be best as possible, and so, to achieve that in the current game, you can use only 3 turrets (Smoky, Thunder, Railgun). All the other turrets, especially short range turrets are useless. I have been talking about short range turrets being useless for long time now and developers don't want to fix the issue. Instead they try to make long range turrets stronger in short range combat, which is ludicrous. I have been playing since 2011 and I think the best thing for the game is to make long range turrets OP for long range, as they were literally made for that, and vice versa. Currently, the meta is very bad as they have nerfed all the turrets and only a few are even worth considering to be used.

Because the developers are money hungry and so they wanted everyone to spend 700 tankoins but not telling that the personal progress will be lost, or should I say, they wrote a small piece about in on the forum which maybe 100 people read and all the other players who are not on the forum will get screwed. Remember, tanki never gives anything for free, they scammed us for 700 tankoins.

My standard is objective and your is subjective. You are crying here trying to say that hammer and tesla are still good turrets, but you are clearly not reading what I write. I have been a hammer and railgun player for a long time, and pardon me, but I think I can tell when I don't get good enough results with that turret after the nerf, then it might not be that good. Again, you are writing rubbish and not understanding my point. Hammer and Tesla are still played, ofc they are. Even the worst turrets in the game will be played by some players. But, my point is that hammer and tesla are not as good as before and that there are other turrets with which you can get much better results in the game currently. Scorpion is dead and I don't care what you say, I see it on the battlefield. If you think that 80% people using the scorpion and now like 5% is not a indicator that the turret is weaker, than I don't want to talk to you and waste my time to some mults who don't even play the game. I am such a magnificent player that I can look into the future and you will see smoky being played more and more. People are sleeping on it. Hammer and tesla are not good anymore, I don't care about your sentimentality for those turrets. I go by stats and reality. Thunder, Railgun and smoky are the top 3 turrets in the game right now and the rest don't even come close. Close range turrets are dead, they remain dead, and developers have killed them. So, you say that my list is not good but then you literally say how railgun and thunder are OP and that you don't see smoky, but that will change and you will have to come here and apologize. Scorpion is dead, stop sugar coating it. Rico is rubbish as everyone has protection.

All of these people are coming after me acting like I said anything controversial but I bet that If I made a list of TOP 3 turrets in the game right now, you would agree. TOP 3 turrets currently in the game (all augments included) are: 1. Thunder 2. Railgun 3. Smoky If you have any different opinion, then you are 1. clueless and should get a doctor check or 2. you are not even playing the game.

Currently, thunder, railgun and smoky are the only usable turrets. The rest are bad Yes, we are playing the same game and what I say is the truth, and you are talking rubbish. Your subjective feeling about hammer or tesla or any other turret is irrelevant. What is relevant is the change in the meta of turrets, and If you cant notice that, then you don't play enough, or you are stupid. I am not saying that there are only a few turrets that we can use, I am saying that there are only a few turrets that we can use and have an above average result in games. I don't know about you but I finish very high every battle and I am always searching for the turret that can give me maximum of points. Tesla and hammer got weaker than before, they are still good, but not good enough. There is not a single short range turret that is viable at the moment. If you want to play hammer, be my guest, you wont even come near me. Long range turrets have been dominating the game for son long. Tesla is high skill, most people don't know how to play it. If you have prot against hammer, it is useless turret. The only turrets that we can play and achieve above average results right now are railgun and thunder. Are you braindead?? You literally contradicted yourself by saying that melee turrets are not useless but then saying they are not as good because you cannot reach your enemy. That is precisely my point. Long range turrets have been dominating the game. It was railgun and shaft and before Scorpion release they both got nerfed and Scorpion was OP. Now scorpion is dead, shaft also, but we have 2 other long range turrets Rail and Thunder that are dominating the game.

The only reason why railgun is ok in this meta, is because all of the short range turrets were nerfed (tesla, hammer - and firebird, freeze and isida are useless). Also, scorpion got a massive nerf, to players will switch to other ways. They nerfed all turrets to the ground and we have only 2 to 3 turrets that are good.

What is going on, the game is so slow, the lobby as well.

Disgusting event again. I don't know whose idea it is, but changing the events to only on weekends is pathetic. Christmas event, as many other, used to be like 10 days straight with no breaks and that was awesome. This is utterly pathetic and stupid. Five days during the week will be lame and no special. The person who plans this needs to be sacked in the morning and bring back old timing of events.

The biggest problem tanki has is 1. Not adding a blacklist so that I cannot play with stupid mults in my team, and 2. the problem with re-joining. I had a teammate who was multing in the game on purpose with k/d 0-20 and then left and re-joined every minute so we were a player short which caused us to lose the game,

There is more than one new battle interface??? Where can I change to the other one

I cannot login to the special site

Imagine, long range turrets should be good in long range, what a shock. I am not a camper, but as a railgun player, obviously you will be in defence helping your team hitting enemies. If railgun was so good for camping, everyone would use it, but even when railgun was really good, only a few players could dominate the games as it is high skill. Making railgun good in mid-range is foolish as every single turret is better than it. Having long range turrets being strong on long range is kinda logical. You cannot make close range turrets good on long range, doesn't make any sense. The solution is to make long range turrets strong and close range turrets strong, not make long range turrets useless. This change will make railgun useless. If anyone wants to use rail for close combat, be my guest, free kills for me,

You are talking rubbish, they nerfed railgun even more with this change. The complaint that railgun is OP in the long range is childish. Ofc it is a long range turret what do people expect. To force players to play railgun is close combat is ludicrous. Every single turret in the game is better close range that railgun, which takes long to reload and best scenario takes 3 shots to kill, including repair kit. Railgun is dead, it remains dead and incompetent mult devs killed it. Whoever makes these changes will never learn. At this point in the game long range turrets are much stronger than close range, especially in the big maps. The solution is not to make long range turrets useless for long range play, but to buff close range turrets. If you make railgun and scorpion good for close combat, it wont make any difference because of the reload. Isida, Firebird, Freeze, Tesla all win in 1v1 with rail even with this change and it is not even close. Even when rail was OP before, not many people used it, as it is high skill. The reason long range turrets are stronger is because you can damage your opponent, or force him to use repair kit before he reaches you. This change is stupid and doesn't make any sense.

Well, you have been scammed.

Who decides what is unconstructive criticism??? I cannot call someone a noob if they cannot turn their turret but are max level.