"We know that you guys are not really fond of status effect augments..." Then why you keep creating them? lol Oh wait, I forgot that it's for $$$, not for players. My mistake, sorry.

Fix servers instead of creating trash augments! Instead of making the game more "varied" by creating more stupid augments maybe work on the "Contracts" system about which there is now nothing mentioned, renewed or remastered Holiday-themed Gold Box skins and updating the Rankings website. Also, what about the gifts which were in Flash version before it was closed, hmmm?! Let me quote one of the questions from FAQ in the topic "Goodbye, Flash!" about gifts which the following answer was given: It seems that you forgot what u planned a few years ago. Only $$$ money money money in mind -.-

Well, I like that developers gave back crystals for what we spent on upgrading the drones which will be removed, but compansating only 60% of crystals is a thing that ruins that update. You've explained that players usually upgraded them on 30-50% discounts and average discount used to upgrade drones was 40%. Honestly, I would prefer getting a compensation from speeding upgrades up. Those who spent crystals on them would get 100% indemnity and feel satisfied that the crystals didn't go to waste( but that doesn't change the fact, that players would still like deleting those 10 drones) and those who didn't spend crystals on speeding ups would get extra prize for patience and smartness. Augments based on a drones?! Is this a joke?! You removed the drones to "simplify the game" to then create more worse augments which will complicate the gameplay even more. About that removing the drones you cited the opinions of the players that say that T.O is becoming too complicated and showed in the previous episode of the V-LOG some short opinions. And I would like to know why didn't you make a poll in which players could tell which drones they use the least and develop they opinions( like writing something more why they don't use it, is it cause it's weak or it's not popular for example?!?! And after closing the poll check the feedback and do some changes to the least used drones and maybe ask YT-Bers to record videos with drones which my be good in gameplay but are little used. But no, some players said gameplay was getting too complicated and you react "OK, game is too complicated so we'll remove 10 drones." instead of asking them to develop their opinions or do a poll which I mentioned. Just because certain drones have not been used often does not mean they are useless and need to be deleted. What if some of them contain secret potential which may be very useful in gameplay. As I said once, gameplay is complicated not because of drones, but because of augments that apply various status effects. Is it so hard to STOP creating them?! No, not taking a break from making them for few weeks, to STOP creating them at all. World won't end if you stop making them. And listening to players is not about telling them to share what do they think about the update, only to read it later and do something completly different than suggested in feedback without any explanation. Well, I guess lot of people will feel like getting scammed cause of only 60% compensations and probably leave the game. This is in such a state not by players, but cause of those "updates". For sure this game is going in the wrong direction. It has been for a very long time, months and years.

Again copy and paste. Except for TOP-1 and TOP-10 prize and this time for TOP-1000. Is it so hard to create 2 different categories for that "Challenge Accepted", for those who buy stars and those who don't?! Both buyers and non-buyers would be satisfied. Buyers could spend money for that drone, and non-buyers could fight for stars from Missions and battles. 100 Tankoins for TOP-100 you can get easier just for finishing Challenge by achieving 3000 Stars. 1000 batteries for TOP-1000? That is not bad, but in some cases it's better to buy batteries for crystals or receive them from containers or Ultra Containers. So well, I'll ignore that challenge once again. Without buying Stars I wouldn't get good awards.

You must be kidding me. Deleting 10 drones from the game which are Camper, Blaster, Miner, Driver, Assault, Engineer, Trooper, Lifeguard, Sprinter, Supplier to simplify gameplay, cause it's "too complicated"?!?!? It's complicated not by drones, but by that augments which apply EMP, Stun, AP, Jammer or Burning, especially cause of Pulsars. Because of those this gameplay is too complicated, not because of drones!!! This game would be 1000 times or even more times better if you would stop creating that trash augments and Ideally, you should just delete them and give a compensation for players with Tankoins or a lot of crystals. But no, who cares about what players think about status effects applied by augments, money is more important. I hope we will know more details about that "update" which will probably be the worst one. Maybe I don't have or use many of drones that will be removed, but think about players who have spent MILIONS of crystals or even Tankoins for them and maybe real money for Tankoins and then Tc for crystals. If players won't receive Crystals or Tankoins( IMO the best option would be to compensate in crystals), that would be a huge scam! I don't want to hear that players will receive containers or normal containers as a compensation! Don't even think about it, don't repeat the same thing you have done in 2018 with splitting triple module protections, especially Legacy ones, in which many players have spent MILIONS of crystals and got batteries as a indemnity. Players who have experienced or witnessed such a scam will know what I mean. Honestly, I hope this will not happen and in the last minute developers will change their mind and didn't remove those drones. Maybe lot of players weren't using them, but they may contain a secret potential. Camper could be good when having full HP I guess, Lifeguard let us save from meteorite gold boxes, Driver helped at completing mission with using OverDrives faster. I can't imagine how this game will look like or how will it end if mentioned drones will be deleted.

You must be kidding me! Why Ultra Weekend instead of Iron Days? I'm kinda disappointed. About Ultra Weekend, it's nothing new and well-known for players who play this game for a long time. It used to be fun, but now - it's monotonous and usually boring. So I'll play a few battles and that's it.

Literally copy-paste from the previous Challange Accepted with minor differences. Only drone XT and the prize for TOP-10 is changing. Again award for TOP-100 is 100 Tankoins?!?!? It's simpler and easier to get this amount by reaching 3000 stars. Why not for example 300 Tankoins or 400 for TOP-100?! That would be more profitable for players. That ridiculous amount which is 300 batteries for TOP-1000 is a huge joke. It's still better to get this amount of batteries by purchasing it for crystals or receive from containers. I would increase it to for example 3000 or 2000. And the biggest problem of that "Challenge" is still that the winner and probably +- TOP-100 or 200 would be those who spend money on Tankoins and then Tankoins on Stars. I suggested once to make a draw in which would participate people who reached 3000 stars by any methods (except illegal ones) and every next 3000 stars you'll get +1 place in that draw and higher chances to win. Honestly, it also would be a good idea to create 2 categories: 1st one is for those who didn't spend any Tankoin on Stars and 2nd one for those who at least ONCE bought Stars. And then, when announcing new Challenge Accepted, you would announce the winners of both categories. In this case, non-buyers could feel free to compete for the XT drone or augments with no need to spend any money, and buyer players could spend their money to also get those prizes. Game could still persist and maybe both buyers and non-buyers will be satisfied. About questions about increasing awards for buyer category, well, I think it may be acceptable, because those who buy in this game with real money get more than those who didn't even spend a single penny on this game, it's logic and normal. If buyers wouldn't receive something extra with their purchasing, it would be a nonsense to buy anything and the game would be quickly closed. BUT, skill isn't obtainable for money, that's why in some cases non-buyer can defeat buyer in the battle. So, what do you think about my ideas?

I understand your fury each time you get 1k crystals or some paints that only give appearance, but I can't agree with the removal of the awards altogether/completely for each rank up. I know this may annoy you, but it's still better than getting nothing for each rank up. Well, I guess most of the players weren't and/or are still not satisfied with the current reward which is 1 container when in the old, but gold days it used to be a specificic reward for individual promotions. Personally I still can't accept that update and now I consider promotions in Tanki as nothing interesting at all. Let me quote what I said about those prizes in the Complaint Book: Well, from that single container I almost always receive 1k crystals or 100 pieces of for example booster armour or nitro or many bad prices. It's easy to get those prizes from Challenges and even much more. Chances to get something more than 40k crystals or 25k crystals is kinda rare and it is annoying to receive such a poor rewards when you used to get 40 times more. I don't know if there will be corrections in those prices, but I hope something will be changed in it. If there won't be, then rank up won't be as enjoyable as it used to be.

Is this a joke or something?

So little things change about that Challenge Accepted. The only things that change are: -The drone XT, which IMO is useless, because it only gives a unique look and consumes more supplies and I don't really care about how cool my tank, it's just an appearance. Also, I prefer to not consume too much supplies in battles to buy them or getting them from containers. -Prize for TOP-10, this time it's <<Nanotech shells>> augment for Thunder. Some of players could get it from the Arcade game, and if they reach TOP-10, they're kind od going to be on the losing end, because there are no compensations for them. About the TOP-100 prize which is 100 Tankoins, you can easily get by reaching 3000 stars in a challenge instead of getting this amount of Tankoins from TOP-100. Easier? Easier. Why not for example 300 Tankoins? TOP-1000 prize- 300 batteries is a ridiculous amount of them. I would understand 10 times more, but only 300?!?! I would prefer getting that amount from containers. Most of the prizes were or are able to get more simply. The worst thing about it is that without buying you won't get a lot, except for maybe 100 Tankoins and 300 batteries. I understand that game has to sustain, but why in such prizes?! I think lot of people will ignore or not participate in this challenge, especially when without spending real money you get poor prizes. I think it wouldn't be that bad to make a draw, in which will participate everybody who earn or buy 3000 stars, and every next 3000 stars they will get +1 slot/place in the draw and higher chances to win, it's a compromise idea from me :) Personally, I won't participate in this Challenge Accepted. Good luck to others who will do it.

"Gold"? Do you mean crystals? Because from Gold Boxes you get 1000 crystals, not gold. If you mean that crystals from gold boxes should count among the mission with earning crystals in battles, well... on the one hand it will help you finish the mission faster, but on the other hand, taking gold boxes in some situations is very easy and often it will happen that you will be the only one who is trying to catch it and eventually, you take it. It would be a good topic to discuss about, should the crystals from gold boxes count towards this mission or not Neutral rating :)

This game is getting worse and worse. For real?! Bots will be added to the game?!?! Ya, to help low rankers to understand this game better. The number of players in Tanki is so low, that you want to bring them into the game, that's also why. Well, I agree with the arguments about bots, that they will help players learn about the basics a bit, about the teamwork, but bots aren't real players and they will never be like them, even as if the bots would be perfectly programmed. As you said in the V-LOG "After all, a bot will never behave like a real player." so how do we know if they will be really helpful? The 3rd experimental stage would be a total disaster for the MM battles, except for low ranked ones. Adding bots to both teams will ruin the tactics planned with allies, they would turn them upside down. Of course lot of players know about huge diversity of ranks of players and often GS, but I disagree that bots are the solution. They will ruin the battles even more and make the gameplay far worse. Well, this will maybe help for low rank battles, but on medium and high ranks it will destroy the whole gameplay. Now winning on the team would not only depend on which teammates you have and which enemies you have to deal with, but also on the amount of bots on both teams. I truly belive bots won't disturb real players with the gameplay. To sum up, In my opinion, bots should be only in the battles with low ranks, for the middle and high ranks they would rather disturb than help their teammates. Experiment with MM is unnecessary to share an opinion about it and I hope this will not be made permanent.

Ultra what? Ultra predictible? Ultra unsuprising? Literally every weekend there is something like Ultra Weekend, expect for discounts, decorations, special modes and bundles. So yeah, nothing new expect for the new **** augment. Well, yes. About the special mode, overdrives are off so luckily Hopper users won't take about 80-90% of the gold boxes in battles. It would be epic if there were higher chances of gold boxes and overdrives OFF, fighting about gold boxes would be more fair. What? There is mission called Medallist. Maybe you already completed it and claim the rewards of it? https://prnt.sc/ne-aouVZ96qa

To be honest, I'm not some kind of a skin collector, so I won't really care if I'll get this skin or not. They only give unique look and I don't use it. I prefer to use the default skin. If you want to use those skins, go ahead, if you don't want to, simply change into default one. Simple and logic. About the Isida GT skin, it looks kinda similar to the HD version, I have seen a few comments such as : "Isida GT for free xD" so design of the skin wasn't fully thought out. I hope that graphic corrections will be implemented to it, in order to not mistake those both skins for Isida and other turrets when adding new skins for them. I'll also comment the growth of the prices of some augments. Is this happening because of the inflation or something? This will make players to earn a lot more crystals in battles or to buy them in the Shop or to simply ignore those augments more by them. I completely don't understand it. Maybe earning crystals is much easier because of the increasing funds which are every weekend, but.... why prices went up so much?! Excuse me, Is this some kind of a stupid joke or something? Rarity changed to Legendary, the rarest catogory in regular containers and no longer avalible to get them for crystals?!?! Now to get those augments we have to rely on luck than simply buy them for crystals!?! What went wrong with the option to purchase them for crystals?! Too little players were buying them?! Wouldn't it be better option to let players how to get those augments, either by purchase them for crystals or obtaining them from containers?! Also, I have a few comments about new battle interface. Why in CTF there are only information about taking and capturing the flag?! The same thing in ASL, why only information about taking and delivering flags?! Why didn't you add information about losing the flag in both game modes and returning the flag in CTF?! And like in @Bydo's screen, why only information is about capturing points, why no news about losing them?! About the expected answer that "It would be too much information in the notifications about the current battle situations." I peacefully ask " Why not to introduce a limit of the information shown about what's going on the battle field at once? Hmm? For example, to 4 or 5 at once and if next information are coming, simply the oldest one shown on the top vanishes. And moving those notifications between the rank and timer with a score counter?!" If it will still cover too much place on the interface, then I'm sorry, but do you belive that the limit will be 3 like it used to be?!?! Of course not, ideas of returning previosly removed features are declined, 1 or 2 messages at once would be too little for me. Not everybody will rely on hearing what it going on on the battle field, some may hear worse or are too busy or/and focused on attacking enemy base or even don't have the sounds of the game turned on. How do we know how every players' playing conditions look like? The new battle interface is significantly underdeveloped! Lot of important news are missing, like previosly mentioned losing flags or returning them. They are not unimportant information, I really liked when it shows to everybody if the flag got lost or returned. You could take a peek for a while and still being able to fight. With so much information in the middle of the screen, (seems there is no limit) it covers a lot of place on the screen and we are not able to properly assess the situation in the battle. I hope this will get some corrections. That's why I rate the current new battle interface only 3 out of 10! The refreshed or upgraded version looks epic, I have to admit it, but graphic design is not everything to make players enjoy that interface! That's all from me about the new update and the new battle interface.

Probably yes, just wait patiently until tomorrow. https://prnt.sc/2E6tuX8Ukzd2