Valid Select 3 maps you don't want to play via MM system

[Thomas11239 366]

YES, goodbye stadium, highways and massacre

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

The map pool will have to be large enough for this, I am afraid if I don't pick the same maps as others, I may occasionally end up in a battle full of campers!

[Alklines 1,751]

Massacre, Highways, Stadium, and Wolfenstein are my most hated maps in MM, in that order. They all just suck.

[DieselPlatinum 5,121]

You tired of seeing the same map or game mode over and over again, or just don't want to be put into a specific map or game mode for whatever reason? Then the ability to block list MM maps and game modes is the solution.

For maps, let's say you don't like highways, and you decide to add it to your map blocklist. Now MM won't put you in that map.

For game modes, maybe you don't like ASL, and you add it to your game mode blocklist. Now every time you use the quick battle button, MM won't put you in that game mode.

[Sacrifice 2,278]

On 6/19/2020 at 9:39 PM, DieselPlatinum said:

 

Topic Merged

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

Goodbye any long-range dominated maps (massacre, stadium, highways)

[wolverine848 13,097]

Arhcipalego - what a useless map

Wolfenstein

Stadium

Highways

 

[DaringDeer 656]

My least favorites are

1. Stadium SGE and TJR
2. Massacre TJR
3. Highways TJR
4. Parma RGB
5. Desert TJR
6. Yorkshire TJR (bases are not balanced)
7. Iran ASL (unbalanced against defense)

[Benefactor 6,888]

On 6/19/2018 at 7:13 PM, Person_Random said:

Yassss 

 

Goodbye Highways! (and two other maps yet to be named)

What are the other two? We may never meet...

[Okami 3,041]

1. Massacre (Most time is spent driving, and the hills make it so you're exposed for all to see, or you have no effective line of sight.)
2. Highways (Pretty good in CP and SGE, but you drive even more than in Massacre.)
3. Stadium (You either use a sniper or just sit exposed in the open. No thanks.)

Dishonorable mention:
Archipelago (Basically a sorting algorithm. First minute or two is a legitimate battle, but after that you either get spawnkilled, or sit on an island with 3 other teammates for minutes at a time. It's not in the top 3 because it's an interesting concept that could work with some tweaks.)

[mjmj5558 2,346]

1 hour ago, GrayWolf8733 said:

Massacre (Most time is spent driving, and the hills make it so you're exposed for all to see, or you have no effective line of sight.)

But it's good for golds.

 

1 hour ago, GrayWolf8733 said:

Dishonorable mention:
Archipelago (Basically a sorting algorithm. First minute or two is a legitimate battle, but after that you either get spawnkilled, or sit on an island with 3 other teammates for minutes at a time. It's not in the top 3 because it's an interesting concept that could work with some tweaks.)

Oh, it's my favourite map . It's good for many turrets, and inzeresting mechanism....

[yasgfgfffgf 282]

very good idea but it would (maybe) be harder for MM to pick players and put them in a map that everyone likes. how ever because there are so many maps on the game it might not be a problem. of course when almost everyone hates let say silence and you like it there very much it would be less fun for you

Edited June 25, 2020 by yasgfgfffgf

[yasgfgfffgf 282]

2 hours ago, DaringDeer said:

My least favorites are

1. Stadium SGE and TJR
2. Massacre TJR
3. Highways TJR
4. Parma RGB
5. Desert TJR
6. Yorkshire TJR (bases are not balanced)
7. Iran ASL (unbalanced against defense)

i have never played on those in MM. and almost never on these

[yasgfgfffgf 282]

it should be an extra page that you can find in setting where you can decide to never play on ... map or that you can decide to never play there in certain mode's like TJR OR CTF. sorry if this idea is already in this topic.

[XxStriker 519]

I'd probably get rid of brest/highways/stadium. I generally play aggressively/midfield and these maps force me to either camp or die constantly.

[yasgfgfffgf 282]

47 minutes ago, XxStriker said:

I'd probably get rid of brest/highways/stadium. I generally play aggressively/midfield and these maps force me to either camp or die constantly.

i love highways and stadium. they are perfect for isida and shaft ;  )

[sharifsahaf 656]

we can all agree that archipelago sucks

[Viking_Thunder_EN 120]

Any chance of implementing this system where you can switch off the maps that you don't want to join. I personally dislike solikamsk and various other maps, so when I get into this map, it's just annoying. This will help make it possible to play on maps, which you like, like before matchmaking.

[Sacrifice 2,278]

3 hours ago, Viking_Thunder_EN said:

 

Topic Merged

[Benefactor 6,888]

22 hours ago, sharifsahaf said:

we can all agree that archipelago sucks

Now wait a minute. I want to see them make a CTF out of that map first.

[XLG1 29]

Stadium isn't that bad, once you have a long range turret things become better. The 2 maps I don't prefer to play in are Massacre and Highways. Both are redundant for modes such as CTF and Juggernaut. Good for CP, Siege and TDM, but that is it.

[ok_hand 95]

Create a rotation pool of maps that updates bi-battle pass-ly. It'll make things a little more exciting and you'll have an easier time pick-and-choosing the maps you'll like with a smaller pool. There're like 40 MM maps right now, and I propose to drop the pool to like 10. If Devs want to pull any maps out to remaster them (which I strongly encourage them to do), this way there'll still always be the same number of maps in rotation. They can also throw in test maps that haven't been in MM rotation before like Deathtrack, Kolhoz, and Novel. 

[Mr.Blitz 57]

Suggestion:
Quick Battle is great for fast matchmaking, but many players leave battles as soon as they’re placed on maps they dislike. What if players could select preferred maps for rotation?

 

Proposed system:
When entering Quick Battle, allow players to tick which maps they’re willing to play on. Game modes (Siege, TDM, Juggernaut, CTF, etc.) stay randomized, but the system rotates only through maps the player selected.

 

Why this is a great idea:

• It reduces match quitting and AFK behavior.
• Players are more likely to stay in matches they actually enjoy.
• It gives players a sense of agency and reduces frustration.
• It doesn’t mess with the core matchmaking system.. just filters maps based on personal preference.

 

This small freedom can significantly improve the matchmaking experience and keep players more engaged.

[NikmanGT 4,362]

On 5/6/2025 at 6:47 PM, GhostLynx said:

 

On 4/24/2025 at 10:33 AM, ok_hand said:

 

Topic Merged

[Sharva 89]

I like this idea... Because even if our system can handle the big maps, the issue takes on another form - low FPS and stuttering.

Also, the current matchmaking system in Tanki is extremely biased towards medium and long-range maps over short-range maps, which essentially lowers the use of melee-range turrets like Firebird and Isida, and light hulls like Wasp and Hornet. In my opinion, all maps, or at least all sizes of maps, should be included in the matchmaking system, i.e., short-range, medium-range and long-range maps, which will not only improve the gameplay experience (by providing players with a large variety of maps), but also make players free to use all types of turrets and hulls without getting absolutely decimated in every battle. Also, I think the number of players to be fit in a single battle should also be decreased by quite a lot, as fitting so many players into one battle does nothing other than lowering our FPS even more and making the gameply more chaotic, as in such battles, you often get destroyed immediately after spawning, which is really annoying.