How about a bunch of Freezes/Isidas instead? Not to mention that both of them can actually move, and see when the flag is being taken (unlike Shaft in scope mode) :P

Yep. I'm the only person so far to give an unconditional yes to the question posed here. Just goes to show how diverse the English community is ^_^

I don't have one. I came up with a paradox argument, and defeated it myself. I have simply determined that we can't prove for sure whether we are flawed or not. Just because I came up with an argument doesn't mean I personally support it, or that I don't see the problems with it.

We have until 10th October to buy the paint, I meant; I know how to read quite well...

Well then you misunderstood what I said. My solution was to go about proving we are perfect, and if we can prove so, we are perfect; if we can disprove this, we know we are flawed both in thinking, and as we're not perfect. Since we can't prove or disprove whether we are perfect, then we can't know for sure whether we are flawed. I did not say the following at any point: "If we can't prove or disprove whether we are perfect, we must be flawed." I disagree with that statement. And so I wholeheartedly agree with your idea that we can't come up with a conclusive argument to say we are flawed, though we both think we are. So maybe we have both misunderstood each other in part, it's wrong of you to assume that I'm the one who's not understanding here. If you so wish, you can either continue to argue even though you are merely repeating what I said and so agree with in your own arguments... ...or we can move on...

We have 'till the 10th October, from what I understand... Yes, I'll buy it.

Shaft is terrible in CTFs (not to mention it's terrible anyway now), that's why.

Le ultimate facepalm. What you continue to call the 'solution' I gave for my paradox was my pointing out of the fact that the paradox is fallacious, through showing it is logically poor. I have no idea why you've 'revoked' that... This is how I see things: - I pointed out my paradox is fallacious (the 'solution') - You did the same - I said I agree - You said I'm going in circles ...

Who are you arguing with? Because I proposed the idea of my paradox, received no conclusive argument against it, and so explained why my own paradox doesn't work, and now you come up with the argument that I acknowledged myself... With that post, I was basically saying why my paradox idea is a clear fallacy. So I don't understand why you are trying to explain what I already understand and agree with...

None of those... Do you have a more accurate chart?

Yes, could do with a thorough proofread. Not bad, but one of the main problems with this is that it fails to use the language techniques 'show, not tell' and 'sensory imagery'. For example: " While Antonio had a Viking m1 with thunder m1 and the stylish Corrosion paint." ...would be a lot better as... "Antonio's sturdy Viking was an impressive sight, flecked with metallic splashes of red and silver, with a sleek, spatula-shaped turret. Cruel and unforgiving in appearance, the mere sight of his tank was enough to instill awe upon his friends, and a deap-seated fear into many of his enemies."

I expected as much.

I didn't dispute that - I clearly stated that we agree we're flawed, though we cannot prove so...

Actually, I don't think this is possible.

That's fine ^_^ Yes, I know that rather big logical error. The simple solution to le paradox is to try to prove that we are perfect, rather than proving we are flawed. Therefore, if we are correct, we are perfect. If we are wrong, we are flawed in our thought, and also flawed as we are not perfect. This eliminates the problem of being wrong about the fact we are flawed, and so being flawed in thinking. Simple... OK, we've determined we can't prove for sure whether we are flawed or not. Though we both believe we are flawed, as we are almost certain this is true. Therefore, we both agree that our justice is flawed, in our opinion. Let's move on?

^This.

Well said ^_^

This voting backfired. Hope Madness returns sometime soon...

If Tanki ended, I wouldn't really mind. Anyone here ever heard of the it's-just-an-online-game-and-not-your-entire-life concept? If you'd feel devastated, you really need to check out the real world sometime, it's a nice place.

+1, now I wish I didn't buy M2 Freeze, Isida, Hornet, Alien, and Electra...

Hmm, it would be good if we were given some details beyond 'technical' issues, actually ^_^ I can understand why there's no refund for the physics changes, but no more refunds ever? What if you change the stats of both weapons and hulls significantly, which will surely happen in the step-by-step implementation of what was termed Tanki 2.0? In any case: +1

Awesome song choice. You got my vote before the poll closed, btw ^_^

No more refunds, ever? OK then :huh:

This kind of died. I win :ph34r:

Awesome! I think I'll buy that new drug kit, and start drugging non-stop against anyone unfortunate enough to be on my friend's list, though luckily for them that won't happen often - just a nice surprise once in a while, eh? ^_^