Both of those actually deserve the titles, and they are given it after clear validation from sources. Rarely I have seen anything being done for the egoistical attitude. As for telling them to go further, it is rather better to have no incentives so that at the end the player helping others is only doing it for the selfless sharing of their own knowledge.

-714

-713

-712 losing now wouldn't bother me as no one cares about this enough

-711 ok

I clearly said that such people also exist in the chat, and there is reason why the chat moderation team DOES NOT give any special power/recognition/icon for anyone, along with the fact that some can confuse them for moderators (the latter part isn't applicable to the discord server I know). Again, there are people in the lobby chats who do the same while not even caring about any reward - since if you think you should be recognised for any help you did to someone, then you are just being selfish and not actually helping. For the false link, if one does not know how to differentiate between a false link and a real one they shouldn't really be on such instant messaging services. For the moderators statement, special icons are everywhere, and it is the fault of the player and not others. Let me make it clear; you won't be moderating them outside the server and there are people who just have high heads just because they got a special sign somewhere else.

Anything which disagrees with your reasoning is just useless blabber, how nice to say that! I didn't advise you to take up 2 administrations at once, and be a EN newspaper reporter on the side. That was your choice, so instead of using your jobs as an excuse, try to provide some solid rationale argument that my criticism was "useless blabber". Explain it here, I like transparency.

welcome to spam dragons

Did you even bother reading properly what I wrote? No? I'll put it up for you: As per the quote above, I clearly write if they are so trustworthy and mature, they wouldn't ASK OR NEED A SPECIAL GROUP. There is a reason behind why the chat moderation team doesn't go around rewarding everyone who answers a question, whether the answer was right or wrong (not to be taken in account for your next rant). I do not have to join a discord server to know what actually helpful people write, and what those who only butter moderators write. For the YouTubers part, again I will put what I wrote here: It is fairly easy to get through the YouTubers TO program (not the very top tiers, though) with just a bunch of golds and a time when the chat isn't being moderated by a moderator in General 1 (which is quite rare since a few weeks, I love that). Instead of being hurt and writing a rant over a 'noob' with not a 'colour' pointing out flaws in your system, try to find a workable solution for your flaws. If you just want suggestions from your discord community, then keep that channel there and don't open this topic if you are not open to rationale suggestions by players who are not part of your discord. Try to take some constructive criticism and not just expect "nice nice" from those who hardly even read through the whole topic. Please, try to write a better rant next time.

ego level 1000 If someone is actually trustworthy and mature, they wouldn't need a special group to be identified or rather even be recognised for their helpful actions. Such persons are identified by their behaviour, NOT A SPECIAL GROUP. As for the YouTubers group, instead of giving it out to just anyone who gets through the TO YouTuber program, give to the ones who actually make helpful content instead of spamming RTL and "SUB4GOLD" in the lobby chats.

mid 2015 in-game late 2015 in-forum from @player_2015_tanker

admin gold plz

#how2contradictyourownself

Whoever said that, put them in your block list as soon as possible. Get a product kit like Boar, Simoom, Anaconda, Juggler and etc.

Halloween special? :rolleyes:

<3 I love this.

Just give it back its post-2016 re-balance self heal.

It is pretty hard to reason that a Russian game would take inspiration from an American anti-armour vehicle. I didn't say it looks like Striker, it sure as heck doesn't. But the main idea behind it, and Striker's accuracy is pretty comparable to Katyusha's.

To be honest, I am thinking that the Katyusha rocket launchers were the inspiration for Striker. Debatable though.

Forum bugs lol

All of us here know that he is talking about the Soviet T-34, not the American T34 (basically a modified T29). So, there is no confusion here and the American T34 isn't as known as the Soviet T-34. :^)

Check out Merkava Mk 4's design. 100% correct about those, except for the accuracy part since German tanks would be able to accurately shoot a T-34 from far away (around 2km) while the T-34 couldn't match their turrets' range with its own turret. I accept that my previous statement was a bit flawed, but still, in other aspects (like turret size, armour and etc) Tiger, Tiger 2 and Panzer V Panther > T-34 or T-34-85.

wow

First Leopard 2 deployment, 1979. All the modern tanks in service with the largest armies are capable of long range combat. .-. T-34 wasn't superior to the Tiger, Tiger 2 or the Panzer V Panther in ANY WAY, except for the sheer fact that Red Army could use 10 (heck, even more) for every tank Germans deployed. Not even the T-34-85 was superior to the Tigers or the Panther. The only thing that came close to them, which served in the Red Army were KV series of tanks and IS series of tanks. To be honest, one could argue the resemblance of Thunder + Viking in the Tigers and the Panther to be the earliest resemblance.

thank you boi :* hope you comeback slt