What Is Your Opinion About the Current State of Tanki Online?

[Spy 14,687]

On 9/4/2025 at 7:06 PM, Jeers4U said:

You can't make the game crappier and expect no one to voice their opinion AND complain about it

But I guess shutting down one negative thread is one way to reduce negative reviews of tanki.

No one is telling you to stop sharing your opinion, as long as it’s done respectfully and follows the game rules, your voice is always welcome. The Complaint Book was closed simply because it wasn’t serving its original purpose anymore. It was first created by our former Community Manager, Cedric, who used to check it weekly and forward complaints to the higher-ups. Our current Community Manager now collects feedback in other ways.

Since we already had two topics doing the exact same thing, this one and the Complaint Book, there wasn’t really a reason to keep both open. Users were using them in the same way anyway.

My team will be collecting feedback from this topic and passing it along, as long as it’s shared respectfully.

[POWER-OF-ONE 163]

On 9/5/2025 at 4:01 AM, Spy said:

My team will be collecting feedback from this topic and passing it along, as long as it’s shared respectfully.

Ok then I would like feedback as to why none of these have been addressed or answered.

 

1-Why are there no protections available until General rank. What is the reason for this?

2-Why is armadillo so expensive to upgrade when so many augments negate it easily.

3-Why so much passive XP, It has a huge negative effect on low ranks.

4-Why are most overdrives redundant. Augments, (bombs, titans dome) and overdrives themselves cancel each other out.

5-Why are useless bots always jug.

6-Why can't you programme bots to avoid blocking players on their team.

7-Why do we need players names and other useless text walls in battles, they obscure everything, making it very hard to see what is going on in the actual battle.

8-Get rid of the useless, redundant augments for turrets and hulls that no player will use. They are useless and ineffective and do nothing to improve your garage.

9-Back in the day clans used to be a "thing" now they are not. What went wrong, and are there any positive points as to why players should join or form their own clan.

10-Why do you continue to produce skins, paints, shot effects, etc when there is far more pressing matters that need your attention, LIKE ALL OF THE ABOVE.

 

 

 

[Spy 14,687]

On 9/5/2025 at 3:25 PM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

Ok then I would like feedback as to why none of these have been addressed or answered.

My team collects feedback and passes it on to the higher-ups, so asking for feedback on your own questions doesn’t really make sense but I’m happy to share my thoughts on them with you. Just keep in mind I’m not a developer, so I won’t always have all the answers.

2. All turrets in the game are capable of dealing critical damage, Armadillo provides resistance against this type of damage. While it doesn’t make you fully resistant to every turret, it does reduce the impact of a specific aspect of their damage.

4. It’s definitely an interesting topic to discuss, and I agree that too many things interfere with each other. I like that you can cancel Wasp’s OD with the overdrives of Mammoth or Hunter, but I don’t like how almost every overdrive can be canceled, even right after being fully activated, by a stun.

6. Bots are being worked on and improved from what I know but honestly, players first need to learn not to keep bumping into each other.

7. You can minimize the battle interface size to 75% to avoid this issue from bothering you, although it had never been an issue for me nor I heard anyone else complain about it.

8. There are many augments which are no longer useful in MM yet they serve different purposes such as for Parkour tricks or private battles.

9. In the current era of the game, clans are more of a social feature (not to be confused with eSports clans). Players enjoy coming together and being part of the same group. On top of that, there’s the aesthetic appeal of having a clan tag next to your nickname, many players (myself included) feel that the right tag makes your nickname look even cooler.

10. The game has several departments, each focusing on different aspects. The team that develops skins is separate from the one that handles game balance.

That’s my two cents on your post. I’ll make sure to pass your questions along to the higher-ups. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

[Hypersomnia 1,695]

On 9/5/2025 at 4:42 PM, Spy said:

All turrets in the game are capable of dealing critical damage, Armadillo provides resistance against this type of damage. While it doesn’t make you fully resistant to every turret, it does reduce the impact of a specific aspect of their damage.

eh armadillo is so redundant that augments turn into either 'self-nerf' item or unstoppable (since they have their crit removed lol) its fine as it is. tho is it worth the cost of like 5 normal prots or whatever is another question.

 

On 9/5/2025 at 4:42 PM, Spy said:

It’s definitely an interesting topic to discuss, and I agree that too many things interfere with each other. I like that you can cancel Wasp’s OD with the overdrives of Mammoth or Hunter, but I don’t like how almost every overdrive can be canceled, even right after being fully activated, by a stun.

overdrives should be easily canceled by other overdrives and not just on paper where it's suppose to cancel another OD but does nothing because the game is a buggy mess.

 

On 9/5/2025 at 4:42 PM, Spy said:

Bots are being worked on and improved from what I know but honestly, players first need to learn not to keep bumping into each other.

what does player bumping into each other have to do with bots? just because we have flying mults who constantly throw your aim off and bump into you (80% of the time it being ares and 19% crusader users ofc...) we should make bots be mults that do nothing but bump into each other too? i mean ok i guess? whatever lol

 

On 9/5/2025 at 4:42 PM, Spy said:

You can minimize the battle interface size to 75% to avoid this issue from bothering you, although it had never been an issue for me nor I heard anyone else complain about it.

interface size should be accessibility feature for people with vision problems or monitors where x% makes the UI look huge/small. one should not be forced to play around with settings to have a PLAYABLE experience. and yes it is a huge issue. why nobody complains about it?
1. there is no one left to complain lol

2. the last 3 people that are left to complain gave up long time ago

On 9/5/2025 at 4:42 PM, Spy said:

There are many augments which are no longer useful in MM yet they serve different purposes such as for Parkour tricks or private battles.

they should improve UI with powercre- new augments of the future in mind. now its just a gigantic list of random icons and words. put yourself in new player's shoes and try to know wtf is going on after he gets like 4 random augments on something.

 

On 9/5/2025 at 4:42 PM, Spy said:

In the current era of the game, clans are more of a social feature (not to be confused with eSports clans). Players enjoy coming together and being part of the same group. On top of that, there’s the aesthetic appeal of having a clan tag next to your nickname, many players (myself included) feel that the right tag makes your nickname look even cooler.

genuinely nobody cares about clans besides the tag. why is this even an issue

 

On 9/5/2025 at 4:42 PM, Spy said:

The game has several departments, each focusing on different aspects. The team that develops skins is separate from the one that handles game balance.

should be common knowledge at this point. tho then just put more resources towards testing and research on what people actually like while striking a balance between enjoyment and monetization. was a good start with surveys. tho they did absolutely nothing with it so...

[Spy 14,687]

On 9/5/2025 at 7:38 PM, Hypersomnia said:

what does player bumping into each other have to do with bots? just because we have flying mults who constantly throw your aim off and bump into you (80% of the time it being ares and 19% crusader users ofc...) we should make bots be mults that do nothing but bump into each other too? i mean ok i guess? whatever lol

They pretty much behave like the average player 

Just joking, I am sure improvements to bots will be implemented later on.

On 9/5/2025 at 7:38 PM, Hypersomnia said:

one should not be forced to play around with settings to have a PLAYABLE experience. and yes it is a huge issue. why nobody complains about it?
1. there is no one left to complain lol

2. the last 3 people that are left to complain gave up long time ago

Excuse me, but settings exist in every game so players can adjust the experience to their own liking. The “perfect” settings don’t exist, because every player has different preferences. If the developers forced one setup on everyone, a lot more people would actually be unhappy.

1. Here you are, complaining.

2. Many players still voice their opinions whether in chats, on the forum, or across social media.

On 9/5/2025 at 7:38 PM, Hypersomnia said:

they should improve UI with powercre- new augments of the future in mind. now its just a gigantic list of random icons and words. put yourself in new player's shoes and try to know wtf is going on after he gets like 4 random augments on something.

I agree, the list of augments is very confusing especially for new players. How do you suggest improving the situation? 

[Hypersomnia 1,695]

On 9/5/2025 at 10:00 PM, Spy said:

They pretty much behave like the average player 

On 9/5/2025 at 10:00 PM, Spy said:

Excuse me, but settings exist in every game so players can adjust the experience to their own liking. The “perfect” settings don’t exist, because every player has different preferences. If the developers forced one setup on everyone, a lot more people would actually be unhappy.

yeah but what's the excuse for a nickname of all things to be rendered over everything in battle which causes the very obvious problem of sea of nicknames and you just blindly shooting into them because all you can see is nicks. that's just design flaw and is inexcusable

 

On 9/5/2025 at 10:00 PM, Spy said:

Many players still voice their opinions whether in chats, on the forum, or across social media

yet how many of the complaints got addressed that are actually major? 1/year? thats not good. many people here complain for fun at this point lol

 

On 9/5/2025 at 10:00 PM, Spy said:

I agree, the list of augments is very confusing especially for new players. How do you suggest improving the situation? 

last time i checked i dont have a job in alternativa's tanki online game. pay me and i'll brainstorm you ideas. now all i'll say is improve UI lol

 

 

also good night Mr. spy its very dark and scary outside so i'll go sleep. sweet dreams sir

Edited September 5 by Hypersomnia
my first comment got removed lol

[Spy 14,687]

On 9/5/2025 at 10:55 PM, Hypersomnia said:

last time i checked i dont have a job in alternativa's tanki online game. pay me and i'll brainstorm you ideas. now all i'll say is improve UI lol

Neither do I, but that doesn’t stop me or anyone else from suggesting a solution to an issue you brought up yourself. Complaining is easy, actually trying to address an issue with a solution isn’t.

Have a lovely night! 

[POWER-OF-ONE 163]

On 9/5/2025 at 8:00 PM, Spy said:

ust joking, I am sure improvements to bots will be implemented later on.

Like I said earlier, why not make it a priority, why must it be "later-when we can be bothered on" 

On 9/5/2025 at 10:15 PM, Spy said:

actually trying to address an issue with a solution isn’t.

Most of the issues are down to the devs themselves.

 

On 9/5/2025 at 8:00 PM, Spy said:

If the developers forced one setup on everyone, a lot more people would actually be unhappy.

Like the flying skip paladin being broken you mean, or like asking players to earn zillions of rep points making them (low rankers) rank up far to quickly and being forced to spend cash to compete.

These are just two of many forced scenarios that the devs employ on players, so yeah, the devs "do force" set-ups (situations) onto players. Stop defending them and their abysmal, atrocious methods.

On 9/5/2025 at 8:00 PM, Spy said:

How do you suggest improving the situation?

Get rid of all augments-situation improved dramatically.

Get rid of all skips-everyone but the little kids no-lifing their mobiles instantly see a marked improvement in the game.

Get rid of bots.

The devs start answering the valid questions posed by players instead of dodging them all the time, or just cherry picking the ones they actually want to answer.
The list is nigh on endless because they have butchered TO beyond recognition.

It's sad really, just like someone I know.

[Spy 14,687]

On 9/6/2025 at 1:57 AM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

Like I said earlier, why not make it a priority, why must it be "later-when we can be bothered on" 

Maybe it’s not something that can be easily fixed, I’m not a developer, like I mentioned earlier. But just because it isn’t solved on the spot doesn’t mean it’s not being looked into.

On 9/6/2025 at 1:57 AM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

Most of the issues are down to the devs themselves.

You’re taking my point out of context. What I meant is that anyone can complain and call it a day. But in my opinion, offering a solution or at least something to work with shows maturity and makes the discussion worth continuing. That’s exactly why I said earlier, “Complaining is easy, actually trying to address an issue with a solution isn’t.”

On 9/6/2025 at 1:57 AM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

Like the flying skip paladin being broken you mean, or like asking players to earn zillions of rep points making them (low rankers) rank up far to quickly and being forced to spend cash to compete.

These are just two of many forced scenarios that the devs employ on players, so yeah, the devs "do force" set-ups (situations) onto players. Stop defending them and their abysmal, atrocious methods.

Yet again, you’re taking my point out of context. I was talking about the in-game settings, explaining that they exist so players can adjust the game to their liking. For some reason, you replied with a completely different point,  though I’m still happy to respond. It’s true that players who spend money will have an advantage over those who don’t, but the current situation is much better than it used to be. The meta changes over time, and to give an example; right now Uranium is one of the strongest augments in the game, and it was purchasable with Crystals for many years. Even now it isn’t hard to obtain, and I know plenty of players who got it randomly. And while the current best augments can be tough to deal with, they can be countered. It’s not always easy, but if you play smart you can definitely make the best out of the situation. If you’d like to engage in a civil discussion, please reply to the points I actually make instead of taking them out of context. I don’t “defend” anyone, I simply voice my opinion. There are things I believe should be changed and areas where the developers can improve. No game is perfect, and Tanki is no exception.

On 9/6/2025 at 1:57 AM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

Get rid of all augments-situation improved dramatically.

Get rid of all skips-everyone but the little kids no-lifing their mobiles instantly see a marked improvement in the game.

Get rid of bots.

You’re suggesting changes that can’t be implemented. The game can’t remove a feature that’s been part of the game for a long time. You’re always welcome to share ideas, but they need to be reasonable and feasible.

[POWER-OF-ONE 163]

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

Complaining is easy, actually trying to address an issue with a solution isn’t.”

Complaining as you put it takes effort when the complaint is constructive, well thought out "AND" will improve TO as a whole for players, especially low rankers.

The solutions I give will make a difference to low ranked players. Most of my ideas are for low rankers and do not primarily effect/involve Legends.

The solutions the devs could give would be to undo most of their shambolic updates, which is why they will not do it. Most of the problems effecting TO are deliberately implemented by the devs to make cash. There is no balance in this game because of the innate greed surrounding it.  

I have offered numerous ways to improve TO, especially for the low rankers who have it extremely hard when trying to upgrade their garage, but none of them have ever made it into the game. 

One example which really does not have a bearing on the economical outcome of the game.

Increase XP needed to rank by a factor of x2 all the way to Marshal. This idea/solution would give low rankers the time needed to accumulate more cry in order to upgrade their account upon ranking. 

This "VALID" and simple solution has never made it into TO. 

There is also the added benefit of keeping similar ranks together in battle because they stay at that rank for longer, so it also improves MM. One solution, one definite problem solved and one improved drastically. How is this not good for the game and It's low ranked players. Give me any downside to this idea.

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

Yet again, you’re taking my point out of context

Yes and no.

It seems to me that you are finding it difficult to counter my extremely valid points regarding all aspects of TO, either that or you are reluctant to voice your true opinions, whereas I am not, having no allegiance to the game.

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

I was talking about the in-game settings, explaining that they exist so players can adjust the game to their liking.

About the settings making the screen larger/smaller.

This does not rectify the massive text walls obscuring the battle. I have complained about this for years now, no solution was implemented, even though it would have been a relatively easy fix.

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

It’s true that players who spend money will have an advantage over those who don’t

Agree and that's fine by me.

Players who spend cash (on OP equipment) should expect an advantage. I'm not against this cash=advantage in battle, all for it actually, only right if you spend wads on a game.

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

And while the current best augments can be tough to deal with, they can be countered

 

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

It’s not always easy,

Understatement of the year that one.

 

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

but if you play smart you can definitely make the best out of the situation

Making/doing your best does not mean that "your best" is anywhere near good enough, so It's a moot point.

 

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

There are things I believe should be changed and areas where the developers can improve.

Please do make us aware of them, maybe I/other players can expand on them.

 

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

No game is perfect, and Tanki is no exception.

But it could at least "TRY" and be THE exception to the rule, you no, break the mould as it were.

 

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

You’re suggesting changes that can’t be implemented.

"CAN'T". You sure about this.

 

On 9/6/2025 at 4:39 AM, Spy said:

The game can’t remove a feature that’s been part of the game for a long time.

You being serious.

If removing skips from the game made them a million dollars a month how long do you think skips would last, should I tell you, poooof-instantly gone.  

Edited September 6 by POWER-OF-ONE

[Spy 14,687]

On 9/6/2025 at 3:03 PM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

Complaining as you put it takes effort when the complaint is constructive, well thought out "AND" will improve TO as a whole for players, especially low rankers.

The solutions I give will make a difference to low ranked players. Most of my ideas are for low rankers and do not primarily effect/involve Legends.

The solutions the devs could give would be to undo most of their shambolic updates, which is why they will not do it. Most of the problems effecting TO are deliberately implemented by the devs to make cash. There is no balance in this game because of the innate greed surrounding it.  

I have offered numerous ways to improve TO, especially for the low rankers who have it extremely hard when trying to upgrade their garage, but none of them have ever made it into the game. 

One example which really does not have a bearing on the economical outcome of the game.

Increase XP needed to rank by a factor of x2 all the way to Marshal. This idea/solution would give low rankers the time needed to accumulate more cry in order to upgrade their account upon ranking. 

This "VALID" and simple solution has never made it into TO. 

There is also the added benefit of keeping similar ranks together in battle because they stay at that rank for longer, so it also improves MM. One solution, one definite problem solved and one improved drastically. How is this not good for the game and It's low ranked players. Give me any downside to this idea.

I agree with these solutions you suggested.

On 9/6/2025 at 3:03 PM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

Yes and no.

It seems to me that you are finding it difficult to counter my extremely valid points regarding all aspects of TO, either that or you are reluctant to voice your true opinions, whereas I am not, having no allegiance to the game.

Quite the opposite. I simply said that players can (and should) adjust their game settings to their liking in order to have the best experience possible. You brought up a completely different point about the Paladin situation. I’m not saying you don’t make valid points, you do,  but this one just isn’t one of them.

On 9/6/2025 at 3:03 PM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

About the settings making the screen larger/smaller.

This does not rectify the massive text walls obscuring the battle. I have complained about this for years now, no solution was implemented, even though it would have been a relatively easy fix.

I understand, I will forward your feedback.

On 9/6/2025 at 3:03 PM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

Understatement of the year that one.

Sure, it isn’t easy, but it’s not impossible either. Many times I’ve seen players with weaker equipment and worse augments on paper achieve better results than those using “OP” gear.

On 9/6/2025 at 3:03 PM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

Making/doing your best does not mean that "your best" is anywhere near good enough, so It's a moot point.

Not always, even with strong augments you’ll lose sometimes. Protections, maps, modes, and other factors always play a role. Sure, doing your best won’t always be enough, but it’s always worth giving it a shot.

On 9/6/2025 at 3:03 PM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

But it could at least "TRY" and be THE exception to the rule, you no, break the mould as it were.

There’s no such thing as perfect - not just in games, but in life too.

 

On 9/6/2025 at 3:03 PM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

You being serious.

If removing skips from the game made them a million dollars a month how long do you think skips would last, should I tell you, poooof-instantly gone.  

I’m being serious. Augments aren’t just going to disappear one day, surely not. But can something be done to improve the current situation? I believe so.

[PirateSpider 1,489]

On 9/5/2025 at 12:00 PM, Spy said:

agree, the list of augments is very confusing especially for new players. How do you suggest improving the situation? 

I got an idea or two that might help. If you like, I can pm you what I have thought of.

On 9/6/2025 at 5:03 AM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

It seems to me that you are finding it difficult to counter my extremely valid points regarding all aspects of TO, either that or you are reluctant to voice your true opinions, whereas I am not, having no allegiance to the game.

You do realize that at least 90% of what you have posted here is basically "flying hulls BAD", "Augments BAD", or a combination of the two, right? 

Even when there's a discussion going on that is about something completely different, you always seem to bring it back to your usual "flying hulls BAD/ Augments BAD" content.

For example if someone was talking about going on a nature walk, you'd always find ways of turning it back to your "flying hulls BAD/ Augments BAD" content.

 

I'm honestly surprised that the admins here haven't declared any content posted by you that aren't about flying hulls or augments as "Extremely Rare Finds or Sightings".

 

On 9/6/2025 at 5:03 AM, POWER-OF-ONE said:

If removing skips from the game made them a million dollars a month how long do you think skips would last, should I tell you, poooof-instantly gone.  

Not very long. But lets be honest here.

In what world are the devs gonna earn a million dollars a month for removing something and keeping it off their game?

[Spy 14,687]

On 9/6/2025 at 9:28 PM, PirateSpider said:

I got an idea or two that might help. If you like, I can pm you what I have thought of.

Sure, feel free to PM me!

[POWER-OF-ONE 163]

On 9/6/2025 at 3:43 PM, Spy said:

There’s no such thing as perfect - not just in games, but in life too.

I'm not asking for perfection.

I'm asking for certain changes to the mechanics of the game to improve "the game".

On 9/6/2025 at 3:43 PM, Spy said:

Augments aren’t just going to disappear one day,

They would if by doing so they cashed in big time.

 

On 9/6/2025 at 3:43 PM, Spy said:

But can something be done to improve the current situation? I believe so.

So in your opinion what is stopping them from "doing so".

 

On 9/6/2025 at 7:28 PM, PirateSpider said:

You do realize that at least 90% of what you have posted here is basically "flying hulls BAD", "Augments BAD", or a combination of the two, right?

Yip, got it in one sport. This is because they are, I hate them in the game.

My "MAIN" argument is the "passive xp" and the ability to rank so quickly "at the lower ranks".  Ranking at an excessive pace is not good for low rankers, not unless you buy your way through them.

On 9/6/2025 at 7:28 PM, PirateSpider said:

In what world are the devs gonna earn a million dollars a month for removing something and keeping it off their game?

Really!!!!!!!!!!

It's an analogy that highlights that anything can be changed (very quickly) if it suits their purpose. 

The main problems with TO are as follows:- 

1 Augments

2 Skips

3 Passive xp

4 Ranking to quickly, making it very difficult to adapt (strengthen) at the lower ranks. Also why no protections until you reach General.

 

Of these last 4 issues I would take vast improvements with the last two against scrapping the first two.

 

[Jeers4U 665]

On 9/4/2025 at 6:14 PM, Maf said:

Are you suggesting that the forum team would shut down a negative feedback thread to try and improve the game's image? For whom? The 1.5 new users that browse the forum? Oh, please.

yes.

[Jeers4U 665]

On 9/4/2025 at 11:01 PM, Spy said:

The Complaint Book was closed simply because it wasn’t serving its original purpose anymore.

I always had the opinion that TCSOTO was specifically for opinions of the game itself while the Complaints Book was an umbrella topic for complaints for 'everything tanki' (including the forum, for example).

[Maf 32,300]

On 9/8/2025 at 5:01 AM, Jeers4U said:

yes.

And you still expect to be taken seriously?

[Spy 14,687]

On 9/8/2025 at 4:08 AM, Jeers4U said:

I always had the opinion that TCSOTO was specifically for opinions of the game itself while the Complaints Book was an umbrella topic for complaints for 'everything tanki' (including the forum, for example).

You are right, but it was created specifically by the previous CM who intended to collect feedback from players. You may use this topic the way the Complaints Book was used. You’re always welcome to send me a Forum PM if there’s something you’d like me to pass on but prefer to keep private.

[Jeers4U 665]

On 9/8/2025 at 1:38 AM, Spy said:

You are right, but it was created specifically by the previous CM who intended to collect feedback from players. You may use this topic the way the Complaints Book was used. You’re always welcome to send me a Forum PM if there’s something you’d like me to pass on but prefer to keep private.

So then can it be inferred that they are no longer collecting forum feedback?

Or just feedback generated via the complaints thread?

[NikmanGT 4,362]

On 9/10/2025 at 4:38 AM, Jeers4U said:

So then can it be inferred that they are no longer collecting forum feedback?

Or just feedback generated via the complaints thread?

They are not collecting it personally, forum moderators collect and forward those feedback.

[Spy 14,687]

On 9/10/2025 at 2:08 AM, Jeers4U said:

So then can it be inferred that they are no longer collecting forum feedback?

Or just feedback generated via the complaints thread?

They are, I am in particular. As I said I mentioned you may either use this topic or send me a Forum PM. 

[Jeers4U 665]

On 9/12/2025 at 4:30 AM, Spy said:

They are, I am in particular. 

Ok. Thank you for the reply.

[Jeers4U 665]

On 9/8/2025 at 1:18 AM, Maf said:

And you still expect to be taken seriously?

Not sure why my rebuttal question was taken down. But I guess that's the new moderation of the TCSOTO--as I referred to.

I said that the only thing tanki takes seriously is profits. Therefore, I would not expect to be taken seriously within this forum unless I somehow add to that.

(Although, I suppose it could be argued that there are some people in this forum that take me FAR too seriously. I'm sure you can guess who they are.)

 

Same question, but to you.

My--now deleted question was--do you expect to be taken seriously here?

Edited September 12 by Jeers4U
b cuz

[Cesarpoa2017 3]

Some  programmer decided it was a good idea to restrain double destruction aquisition. I´ve played this game for years and now I have 44k of doube armour and 44k of repair kits, bot ZERO double destruction, since crystals are hardly acquired in prizes, so pushing players to spend money to keep playing - since it´s almost impossible to get in matches without any double destruction.  Congrats, the game keeps getting crappier more than never.

[NikmanGT 4,362]

It appears that my previous message may not have been fully understood, so allow me to clarify in this separate post.

While we fully acknowledge and accept that players may express dissatisfaction and frustration regarding various aspects of the game — particularly issues concerning hovering hulls — we must emphasize that the use of player-invented nicknames for these items is neither appropriate nor productive. Such terminology adds no value and does not contribute to meaningful or constructive criticism.

You are encouraged to share your concerns, even if they are negative, but please ensure that your feedback remains clear, constructive and respectful. Continued use of unnecessary or disparaging names for in-game items will lead to forum warnings.