such a waste for 3 extra damage for one crystal very much very. it's almost a given to MU the first few steps regardless as they are the most cost effective tbh.

I feel silly now. I'm still getting M3 Hammer first if funds limit me though. Hammer is absolutely great imo, it rivals Firebird.

We [the EN community] should make a book about this type of stuff, who agrees?

I really don't have that problem with thunder...:x

Dictator-Hammer is probably the best or one of the best combos ingame imo...

1) bold doesn't do anything to make your statement any more important. 2) I'm quite active on these forums, when was that a thing? 3) there was one nutcase out of the 20 people in the isida forums that asked for self healing to be removed, and we already told the person why it would be a terrible idea. 4) not liking the opposition has little to nothing of if you would use the turret or not. would have been better a few months ago

Wasp...Its faster speed and its turret position make it better for dodging and the peek-a-boo tactic. Both hulls are guaranteed to flip anyway. Also, drifting is such an overrated "upside", you stay exposed for longer when turning a corner.

and to @canadarules: Frickin' perfect. (aand i upvoted the wrong post)

never did. Firebird prot paints do.

So is Thunder-Wasp. (except the overused part)

When I used Thunder, it only took one person with cedar to completely cripple my efficiency. What if that person was on a killing streak with drugs? What if the person was capturing the flag? I could do close to minimal damage on the target, but I was relying on others to kill the person for me. What could I do? Switch for M1 Smoky? It has no MUs. Switch to M1 Firebird? If the person was drugging Nitro and using Hornet, forget it. *Reads back over* What a misleading topic sentence, why did I ONLY skim. >.>

If i could do one thing that I couldn't do, it'd be to put a disclaimer on that most of my posts on the "Hornet and Failgun" thread were my worst posts on the forum, period.

Is it just me or do I not understand why Railgun has such a gigantically massive fanbase compared to most other turrets? I'd say Railgun is completely overrated, and most of its recent nerfs were brilliant.

y'know what? I'm not gonna deal with THE SAME ARGUMENT. If the user can assess the current situation and continuously find the IDEAL sniping spot, I can't say they're bad regardless if they turn their turret or not. But tbh, the quote below me is perfect.

You haven't been DQed yet? Here's the original link, i'm pretty sure this is the original http://www.dragoart.com/tuts/3637/1/1/how-to-draw-a-panzer-tank.htm

Sorry to repost, but this question never got answered...

1) Do you turn your turret? 2) Do you turn your turret while moving? 3) When you fight, do you do something besides ramming someone? If you answered no to any of those questions, no, don't buy it. If you do buy it after you answered "no" to any of those questions, shame on you,

*uses Wasp to climb Dictators* *dies b/c i forgot to activate DA*

nothing to comment on against anything under that, (Translation: i'd break my keyboard b/c i'd facekeyboard too much) which is why i tried to shorten a text-wall.

ex-Fire-Wasp specialist and current Thunder/Hammer specialist.

It is still a shrewd way to win.

Yay, thanks!

It kinda is. I can play perfectly, but how long can a 1v1 occur before I get piled/killed by someone else? Damage is simply for efficiency, but paints can reduce efficiency by a huge factor (50% hp against a weapon...50% more time to kill someone). With very low efficiency, very good players aren't going to kill anything.

The ending...it just...just no.