I had it linked but the hacker changed the email and reconfirmed the password using his email... ;-; I know this because the email the account was linked to gave no notification as to a password change, but the password had clearly been changed. That means that the first thing he did was change the email. However there is the slimmest of chances that he was an ***** and didn't do this, and simply hacked my account and then used it, completely disregarding safeguards.

Hello! I found an incredibly old account that I owned that was hacked, and I just recently found it again, with all the data still there! Can someone help me with recovering it, I would be so grateful to recover this old and valuable account! Thank you!

Erm.... CoD or GTAV much? I like the concept but it needs serious balancing work. For example, you need to have line of sight with the bomb in order to detonate it, otherwise it becomes useless. The bomb will only kill one hull, any class, any drugs etc, but it cannot damage other hulls meaning no splash damage. The bomb cannot attach to allies in order to prevent sabotage. The supply will have a duration of 30 seconds and a cool down of 2 minutes, in order to achieve a decent balance. The bomb can be attached to the ground similar to a mine. IT CANNOT BE LAUNCHED VIA ARC, meaning it cannot go over buildings, props, or other hulls. It will have a severely limited range, barely 50 meters (The barest sliver of Hammer's max range) and it can be removed via firebird by burning the mine.

You forget that there is a variety of military grade mines code named "Bouncing Betties". These mines have no lethal explosive charges inside them. Instead, they contain a small, controlled amount of shaped plastic explosives design to launch the mine (And who ever was unfortunate enough to trigger it) anywhere between 5-10 feet in the air. These mines were designed by the US Military as an effective and safe way to train soldiers to recognize and avoid potentially lethal mines. However, these mines have cause injuries, mainly broken legs and arms from the troops landing wrong upon being launched. So, as a counter balance for a mine that has double the impact force, or straight flips a tank on its side or top, it should do minor damage, far less than what a standard mine does (1200-2400 damage per standard mine, making these "Bouncing" mines do around 200-300 damage [A significant amount of health from light hulls])

Have you heard of Viking XT, my friend, because that's exactly what you just suggested except M0 and has the plating design of XT Firebird/XT Wasp combined with XT Hornet/XT Railgun. :p

You're self healing, but only 10% of your damage goes to your hp. Depending on your hull this self heal rate is literally nonexistent. <_< As for the Mac thing, I think the devs discussed that in an earlier V-Log.

Ugh, it's like the Isidapocalypse all over except with an infinite range Rico bullet. HOW DO YOU KIDS COME UP WITH THIS CRAP!

Ack, don't ask me, I'm not the dev team or Cedric. I've heard rumors that an artillery style turret is on the proverbial table of ideas, but the devs are working on the Rocket Launcher turret at the moment, so it's possible that the artillery may have already been started but is on hold for the time being, until they release the Rocket Launcher. Also, about the Rocket Launcher, it'll be released after New Years (It was announced in the V-Log so i can safely say it here) ;)

More WoT stuffs. I like the fact that everyone brings beautiful ideas to the proverbial table, and yours has been mentioned quite often. Everyone is demanding for an artillery/mortar style turret, and it's absolutely glorious to see a community so determined to have one unified idea implemented. However, Tanki doesn't accept ideas from this forum often, so the chances of having an artillery turret are slim. But, we will have hope that Cedric or someone close to the dev team sees all these wonderful ideas for a mortar and has them implemented.

Quick speed and light health slightly worse than Hunter's <_< And it becomes invisible unless at close range. Let's just add a hull that can become invisible and ghost enemy tanks at any time the player chooses, shall we? That should fulfill the need for a stealthy hull

He's not saying that, he's saying that the moderators need some newer people, not 50 year old people who have been on thee team since Tanki's official birth... He's also saying that the old moderators either need to go or get some serious rehab from Napoleon's Madness syndrome.

True, but Mammoth weighs more, has more horsepower and is actually about half a meter taller than titan. Weight and power actually matter in a vehicle, they determine how hard the hull is to push and how hard the hull can push others.

Yea, that thing. I have that turned on for the distance blur, all my other graphics are off.

Excuse me low ranked dude, turn down your graphics if you're experiencing FPS issues. I have a computer with a graphics card from the 90's and my graphics are lowered to the point where the only true graphic setting on is anti-aliasing, which if I remember correct causes distance blur. I have Mip-Mapping on, Skybox on, Adaptive FPS off, and everything else is normal. This allows my crappy graphics card to run the game at a decent 15 FPS on a full game on Desert. On a map like Duel or Ping-Pong it'll run at an amazing 45-50 FPS (Cause one person in the room with me= less graphics processing needed) Don't come round here spouting your nonsense and annoying other tankers. There's a reason you can't create topics yet unless it's to report a game violation. It's because low ranked tankers tend to be rowdy and they have no filters...

Ooooooh kk I was just curious lol

Nuuuu you can deal with us nerds conversing about pros and cons about my turret.

Hmm... This is very true. Also "1 clip almost all hulls" = Exact description of Hammer M4 :D This turret has randomized damage rolls, so it actually can be outclassed by Hammer in some respects, and in fact is in terms of reload, average damage per shot, impact force. Also, I figured implementation of the burst fire functionality would be as easy as using Hammer's programing, changing the projectile characteristics to match those of Railgun or another single pellet solid projectile weapon with a high muzzle velocity (Thunder would probably match these characteristics the best, because it has good muzzle velocity, and is a solid projectile) Also, the curve of stat buffs for higher modification is laughably low, the damage only increases by 50min-max, the range becomes about 20 meters-ish longer, rotation increases anywhere between 10-15 deg/sec, reload barely decreases at 5.8 secs-ish, penetration goes up 10%, and max range damage stays constant... This turret isn't quite as op as it seems, but it's still op.

That Twins was having a good game XD But yes, the kill feed now tells you that you got a mine kill. One way I knew I got mine kills prior to the balance/update is I would see random kills credited to me despite the fact that I was either camping and sniping, or pushing the flag in CTF (Only game mode I use mines)

This is a good idea, however with the clutter filling the game HUD, having a notification pop up on the side saying "This guy ran over your mine for X amount of damage" would be annoying. However, a simple solution would be to add this: The person drives on the mine and detonates it, but doesn't die. In this situation, a small text box will appear in the general area of the mine detonation detailing the name of whoever caused the detonation and the damage dealt to his tank. Using this information, you can promptly assassinate him as long as he doesn't drug a repair kit immediately upon detonation of the mine. Sounds cool right?

I guess you're right... Also, technically tanki already has a semi-auto weapon, we have Hammer. This weapon works on 3-round burst function, like a FAMAS or MTAR bullpup assault rifle. And also, being a 3 round burst weapon, that is all the uniqueness you need. More unique features would be the penetration (It would be the only other turret that has it, as Shaft had its penetration removed) The turret isn't just for parkour, but it would have enormous advantages being used as a parkour turret. When it comes to using a hull on this turret, you're right, people would go with heavy hull pairings and would become next to invincible, but the reload is still long, so if someone gets in close with a short range turret (Firebird would probably be best) the user of this weapon is toast. As for damage, like I said, the accuracy is somewhat poor so landing shots will be difficult even with a heavy hull, and that's mainly because even if they tank won't flip and misbehave, it'll still rock on the track backwards (Similar to the effect of a turret mounted on an extreme front or rear mount point, like Mammoth, Dictator, and Wasp when mounted with Shaft, Railgun, or Thunder)

So... Basically Wasp with Hunter's armor and Mammoth's turn speed. All I need to know.

Bro, you can't roll max damage rolls with any turret, it's a mathematical impossibility. Literally the only turret that rolls a "max damage" roll is Smoky with a crit, otherwise no turret can roll full damage. The way the game's damage RNG works is it is stacked against high damage rolls. Believe me when I say that even before the update to balance railgun's damage, I know I never rolled max damage because max damage for my railgun pre-balance was just barely enough to oneshot kill a stock Hunter, but it never did, so I know I've never rolled max damage.

Three shot railgun is fairly accurate of a description lol However, this does have a couple of key differences, namely recoil, penetration, and reload. Recoil is insane on this turret (like you said, tri-shot railgun). If you ever look at videos for infinite ammo/no reload hacks for Tanki they almost always demonstrate railgun, which that hack can allow M4 Mammoth to fly with M3 Railgun, so think of the recoil affecting it in the same way. The penetration is lower than railgun, at M0 it's a measly 30% damage transfer compared to railgun's 55% damage transfer per vehicle shot. Reload is significantly higher to balance out damage output. There are plus sides to a turret like this though, it would make parkour incredibly easy as 3 shots from 3 separate railguns in game make M4 Wasp fly, so imagine condensing the zone of impact and putting that on one turret. You have the perfect parkour turret. Lol

You're right, it doesn't, but I'll say this though, both games are developed by Russians. So, you can understand why I makes comparisons.

Ja, and the theme can be some kind of predatory animal. Kinda like Thunder/Viking, which is a bear. Maybe if it was a lion... Ooooh, lion themed Smoky/Titan XT. That would look badass.