Spy's GS = ∞

What do the devs think about the Vulcan "buff"? Is there any chance they will actually buff it? Do they think its balanced/OP? Is it too soon to tell?

Bye, GL IRL.

I withdraw my ecstasy. Vulcan has been nerfed again. The damage is still pretty low, and everything else... ugh. The afterburn is killer. It takes way to long to start the turret spinning. The gyroscope was already removed. When they "balanced" it the first time they also nerfed its auto-aim. My opinion on what Vulcan needs: Slightly more damage Gyroscope Decreasing the charging time a little Decrease the afterburn (Devs did say they were working on this, so thats good.) OR a decent alteration that returns Vulcan's parameters to that when it was released in exchange for something like more burning damage or starting burning more quickly. Im really pretty upset. Ive been waiting for a Vulcan buff for so long, and now this...

Normally no. There is an alteration for Ricochet that gives it splash damage, but the stock rico will not cause splash.

I think it really happened *pinches self* Its real! Woooo!

The dream Tank is any combination of equipment available at that rank. (Not including kits). And yes, it is generally maxed out with MUs.

Thank you. ThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyou ThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyou ThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyou.

Hmm... Tanki Thinking Challenge, I believe.

They mean M3s that have been upgraded 20/20.

No, the burn damage is not affected by DP.

Huh? What exactly is the issue?

Is the cat OK :lol:

He can (and does) forward the opinions of players to the devs. He does not have the power to decide what is nerfed or buffed.

Nives is mot in control of game balance. Only the devs have a say in it.

I cant prove that they are doing their best. But, however much effort they are putting in, it is good enough. We have an amazing Wiki. You are clogging up this topic: If you want to argue more, send me a PM.

I dont think anything will prove it to you, as you are obviously biased against the Wiki editors for some unknown reason. And for that one page with incorrect info, there are probably a hundred perfect ones. They Wiki editors are doing their best, and that is good enough.

He doesnt need to. You can take around 99% of the countless pages of the wiki as proof.

The opposite? Your evidence for this being one piece of incorrect info? That should actually be left incorrect? Pu-leeeze.

I think Ninja has already explained to you that they are doing an excellent job.

Nice.

MU the smoky and viking. Dont use speed ups. If you can get it to m2 anytime before Colonel you will be OP.

Ahhh. The question is, whats not special about it?

Goood. Goooooooood.

Is editing a Wiki page like editing Wikipedia? Does it use the same kind of code, or very similar?