Yes, and no, but more yes, kinda. This paragraph is a lot better than your first one, and Id say sums up the f2p position very well. Well written. If a person said what you said, but had a low k/d, Id think that person is good evidence for your point. Your account is evidence against th game being unplayable because you are clearly succeeding and doing way better than average. However, here you assert that you can still compete despite the game offering bonuses to paying players, which is both as it should be and just well said in general. The game is Very generous to f2p players, but they will still face an uphill battle in some places when facing those with much better equipment

Ok, thats helpful. Supplies used to be $20 for 1500 of each, so to get 1,500,000 mines, they need to spend around $20,000...seems good I guess

How do you all have enough supplies to use that many. Ive now got like 20k of each main one but even if all those are used up thats what, 80k?

Something that would be nice and I think easy to incorporate would be to add more of those old maps to matchmaking. I recently saw a battle in siege map and it seemed like such a cool map. There are others that just dont get used for...reasons I guess. Remove maps like archipelago which are insta-leaves for some and replace them with some other good old maps

Great answers thanks!

Good point. My point is that if you have a high k/d, to say that the game is unplayable seems suspect. To say that the game is pay to play, while clearly being a top play without paying, seems to self contradict. If someone is getting wrecked each battle and cant compete with paying players, then yes that might make sense. Clearly this person isnt getting wrecked. Has plenty of supplies and is succeeding, ergo, playing without paying

legend 4 vs gismo? I said at gismo i had used about 40k Complaining that the game is tough when you have k/d of 2 and have had easily enough supplies seems not particularly legitimate. IF...someone comes and say this game is super tough for f2p players and they have a k/d of .65....then yes, they should 100% be taken seriously.

1. THis is a pay to play game. 2. As a nonplayer still plays...ero contradicting first point. 3. Has a k/d of 2.08..ergo the game is not pay to play. 4. Has used 94k supplies which is twice what I had used at gismo...f2p is great in TO Unless I'm missing something this seems to self-contradict. Kinda tired of player with high k/d complaining that the game is hard

All I saw about dictator was that it gives 25 points per overdrive given, ergo my maths. 3x4x25=300. A score of 3000 would require 120 overdrives given, if we ignore other methods of gaining score which seems like a tiny number in coparrison. So, if you gave 120 people overdrive, lets say in every case you manage to give it to every person on your team, that would be 120/7=+-17...ergo this person used overdrive 17 times. As the user who gained 3000 score only had 2 kills and was using railgun, we know we arent dealing with isida. Even if we put 7 of those overdrives to equal capping flags or assisting in kills, 10 overdrives is a TON

How are these scores possible...if I use my overdrive 3x and get 4 players each time, that only 300 points.....lets say i get all 7. Thats what, 500 points? Cant see where you get 3k or even more than 1k without lots of kills

Could you elaborate. We were talking about overdrives and you mention "nonbuyer". What do they have to do with each other? maybe I missed another update...overdrives cost now? edit: bruh, you have a kd of 1.8. If by more challenging you mean you arent dominating every battle, then thats great! A game has a big problem if some ppl dominate every game

Does it still only use 1 batt per minutes?

You are saying mechanic drone is one of the better ones? I bought it a log time ago but never used bc it just seemed like a boosted repair. Id rather have defender drone being good than booster. Getting oneshot by magnum/rail/striker even when i have armor always feels bad

I've got a great discord group, I just wish there was more competition between tankers in game. Not good enough for esports lel.

I really like where all the overdrives are right now. Dictator gives a bit too much score, but some score is good. Hunter is perfect as is viking and all of them. Wasps rarely/never end up in top score, but it got a noob overdrive so buffing it would be oppressive, leaving it as this hull if you like dying a lot. Mammoths has that amazing ability to run into a clump of enemies and wipe them all out. Titan is like a mobile fortress.

Idk, Id rather have the speed boost. It did seem bad that mammoths didnt self destruct under meteors

Im not a coder but it seems pretty simple. Do it and then boom...clans mean something. Theyre losing players, not as quickly as ppl say, but its happening...community keeps ppl

So I see a significant number of ppl voted "hate it"...why are they here lol. Go play something else. Its like the old "Im gonna quit this job soon" person that never quits just continues complaining. Being on edge is fine, its a realistic position, but there should be very few who vote hate it bc they need to just leave the game.

So, clans seem special to new players, but once you are in one, you realize they're just a tag at the beginning of a name. Tanki is a great game but many wont stay for the long haul unless there is a sense of community. Clans should be that. A few suggestions: 1. Increase clan size: I'd suggest a size increase to 50 or maybe 100. Currently the 12 man clans are so small you rarely run into ppl from any given clan. You battle someone from HOTG clan...good luck, you wont see another HOTG person for months. Bigger clans mean fewer clans and being in a clan means more. You see clan ETRY or CHIEF and you think, ah he is in that powerful clan. 2. With larger clans, add ability to set allies and enemies: This would be amazing, allowing clans to build friends and enemies. Marking enemy clan members in battle would make battles even more important. A brief story: I played a game several years ago...it was a base building game. Anyway, the alliances made the game worthwhile as you didnt think of people as individual bases but rather as part of a bigger team. Made the world feel a lot smaller and names became well known, which was great. Currently, the clan system in tanki is meaningless, but these changes would give meaning to clans as well as create a bigger meaning than just blowing up tanks. I'd suggest that such a change would give players a reason to stay longer as they would become part of a group and would make friends with other clan members. I am in a discord made up of many clans...i wish tho that we could all have same tag and be in clan together. Regardless the community part, that many players miss, is what brought me back from quitting

tru....kinda sad...makes me want to make a noob account as isida dictator...just help new players do well

See, this is what I dont get. Shouldnt a selfless turret be given an incentive so people are rewarded for helping others instead of just playing for themselves. Things like Isida and Dictator should be given good scores for taking care of others...especially now like you mentioned that titan's dome doesnt heal

Id agree. I really like where hunter is. Its super annoying and effective but not oppressive like it was initially. Glad hunter has a good OD

I played some mammy yesterday and really loved its OD....when you run into a full base it feels so great...just driving over ppl while zapping them...felt pure evil. Id suggest the full repair is fine vs invicibility. It gives some counterplay. Before, a mammoth could attack and if you couldnt escape you just died...now you can kill it if youre lucly. The speed boost means i can chase down medium hulls ???

I tried isida recently...is there a reason the score from healing is so low?