Topic merged.

Hello, kindly post your topics in English. Topic closed.

@Ballista524Did you receive an answer to your question? Can we close the topic?

Hmm bots were already considered annoying and so is blaster. I don't think combining them will satisfy the players. Surely there're other ways to adjust difficulty? Also disproportionately punishing short range turrets here. Nice to see some love to railgun

I don't love these changes either, but I get that there are probably underlying reasons behind them. Could be for example that these modes tend to end quicker than others when players focus too heavily on the objective due to the point rewards. Rewarding points for objective seems fair, but ig players will still be drawn to it unconsciously anyway, so maybe it's just a balancing thing.

Answered, closed.

Topic merged.

Honestly, Phoenix can never be truly balanced. If it's too strong, it breaks competitive fairness. If it becomes too weak, there's no motivation to grind for it or play it, which makes the reward meaningless. It should become a cosmetic item imo, they show status without breaking balance.

Hello, please write your posts in English. Topic closed.

@LuckyLukeDid you receive your rewards yet? Can we close the topic?

Emergency nerf for shock therapy wouldn't be a bad idea ngl.

Topic merged.

Ahh okay, should become a DM rule as well imo. And if it becomes one, the grouping option won't be necessary anymore.

I agree that teaming in DM creates an unfair advantage, but isn't colluding with opponents not already against the game rules? So removing the option to group in DM modes is a simple possible solution imo.

@raphy2Is your question answered? If so, can we close the topic?

Hello, video reports of players violating game rules can only be done through Game Violators section on the Russian forum. Topic closed.

Answered, closed.

Topic moved from game discussion

Saw it, guess I replied too quickly ? I think that they right now separate the e-sports scene from the casual players which are the vast majority. The drawback of like potential backlash players will receive or privacy concerns by publishing the ban history is probably not worth it except in the competitive world.

I know that for e-sports, the Tankisport website already shows whether an account is/was banned from e-sports activities.

Yeah the nerf was intended and you could argue it wasn't deserved, but I think the way they implemented is fine. The change adds a small strategic layer instead of nerfing it outright.

Post moved.

All reports are reviewed based on the forum rules, but I just want to let you know, you can always reach out to one of the mods if you ever feel like a report was mishandled. I'm not gonna comment on every aspect of our approach, but if you'd like to discuss something further, always feel free to send me a PM.

Hello, criticism isn't being removed for being negative, only if it violates the rules. A respectful and constructive post is especially welcome and we encourage players to write so. As for personal attacks, we review and take actions if necessary and you can also report posts if you feel like they violate the rules.

Friendly reminder: Critique the idea, not the person. Please keep the feedback constructive and avoid personal remarks.