Ah, one of your first posts (or should I say rants? ;) ) comes to mind now. Good luck quitting; you're going to need it.

In English, it's the same but without the accent ('atheist').

As an invaluable member of the forum, you are beyond compliments. What you have done for our clan and the community is just outstanding :)

Always nice to play with friends ^_^

And you really think the developers would make it so that could happen? No.

Haanji, well said :D (EDIT) From the little Hindi I know, he said that American English seems silly and that he never understands anything, whereas British English is good and he understands it, and that it's tone is also good.

Upgradable paints - didn't hear about that one! Looking forward to these changes being introduced into the game :)

I was not saying there was a 'declining' 9% probability - rather, you were saying that the probability increases with each shot whilst it actually remains constant for each. For example, if I wanted to experiment this, we can safely say the the theoretical probabilty (the one it's meant to have) is 9%. Therefore, let's say I want to test this by getting my own experimental probabilities (probabilites obtained from experimenting). An example set of results is below: - 2 crits out of 10 shots (20%) - 7 crits out of 100 shots (7%) - 98 crits out of 1000 shots (9.8%) - 904 crits of out 10,000 shots (9.04%)... ...and so on. As we can see, our experimental probabilities get closer to the theoretical probabilty (9%) as we increase the sample size. We'd have to go on forever to actually match the two. So, it's not random, but it's not exactly determined either - there is a margin for 'error' between the two probabilities which decreases as we increase the sample size. Anyway, I will not have this discussion any more, and so I will 'shut up', as you so kindly said. Many Thunders use the self-destructing ability to their advantage, and SD on low health when they know they're going to be destroyed otherwise. Take that away, and you've taken away what can be an advantage of the weapon for most of the more skilled users.

Woah, so stereotypical. We don't usually speak like that, yeah? :P

Well said :P

That was to you, yes. You still continue to amaze me in your blissful ignorance of this game's rules.

How did you discover our secret? :ph34r:

How was he meant to get that picture without turning his turret?

You are awesome in that you effortlessly made this game fall apart for a bit... Such skill :P

You must have done a different sort of test to achieve 194, and be 3rd highest. But still pretty good :)

Of course they do ;) And why should I, you said you were [censored upon request] yourself! :huh:

You already said before you edited one of your previous posts, you're [censored upon request] years old -_- Most geniuses can spell the word itself correctly, though... :D (EDIT) And I did tell you to stop showing off! :P

This IQ test probably isn't accurate at all, though. , stop showing off! :P (EDIT) It's funny how all of those with IQs higher than 160 according to this test are Warrant Officers! B) Though it wouldn't exactly be hard to copy the image link for this...

Yep, destroying doesn't matter in TDMs.

I'm sure your French articles are great, too, though I can't read them - you are making history in being our first ever French correspondent, and you're doing a fantastic job! :)

Well, that's mainly because Mammoth was OPed, but fair point.

Your commanding tone is bold yet powerful, shining a light from the darkness and guiding kmak.anaka onto a path of righteousness and grateful obedience.

You're also right in your arguments for Rail, it's a classic weapon that only the best players can master. I'd argue that it requires the most skill out of all the weapons to master. Especially because if you mess up a shot and there's no cover to escape behind, it's really embarassing standing there and getting destroyed :D

^Zero, exactly why a Freeze is better. In TDMs, Freezes can freeze enemies and get points when other destroy them, and in CTFs, Freezes are invaluable defenders and pretty good attackers, too... Anyway, stop this debate, its not balanced as they're different types of weapons altogether! :P