Well, you won't really be helping your team by dying, but I see your point. :) Camp is a troll map. It is my least favorite map in the game.

29

Piece of advice: Never do that at higher ranks. It is a deathtrap situation.

24

Twins and Smoky I consider the best M2s. Then firebird and shaft tied (I would have put firebird in front but with the burn time nerf I consider them equal now. )

However. Hunter has a turret closer to the edge, so it's better for peek-a-boo.

Congrats to Donald Trump and a big thank you to all the veterans and current servicemen as well. :)

Eh? Hornet doesn't have drift anymore, which makes it better for circling with freeze. Also, it turns and maneuvers faster, which makes it better for getting away with the flag. Wasp is hard to use because the recoil from your own turret and the impact force of other turrets knock it around too much at higher ranks.

19

LOL as a matter of fact I did exactly that, it's the last post.

See. This is what I mean when I say "immature and rude people". You know you are wrong, but don't have the courage to admit it, so you resort to cheap insults to cover your mistake. I am giving you factual information, and I am not pretending to be a mod. Keep my words to myself? Isn't the point of a forum the exact opposite of that?

Did they fix Shaft's ghost bullet yet? If so, thank you. :)

Wow. BlackWasp, don't even bother arguing with these people, there are some immature and very rude people out there. Please try to understand anything before you start insulting people based on it. Default rank range IS NOT the same as MAX rank range. You can STILL create battles with the exact same rank range as yesterday. However, the DEFAULT, (or the range you get if you don't adjust the slider, is changed. If you want to play with a wider rank range, all you have to do is move the slider. Stop talking about what you don't understand. Enough said.

hhh Just mad because everyone has Rail protection xD :D :D :D

You will still be able to create battles, don't worry. :) Try playing on the test server when there's less players. It's quite fun, actually. It's not Tanki's fault you can't get on in the evening or afternoon.

29581

Well a fully upgraded module has to fill two requirements: -It has to have protection that adds up to AT MOST 150% -It has to have NO MORE than 50% per turret. So if we were to introduce quad modules, then each fully upgraded parameter would protect 37%. And I think it should cost 350k, not 400k, since the overall protection is not any better.

When you can't like posts in this game because you've reached your like limit for the day :P

Will the "BATTLE" mechanism favor battles with more players, or do you have an equal chance of joining a battle with 2 players in it?

Mammoth-Freeze duel in Stadium is so fun, and it definitely proves skill. :P

^ what he said. :)

PLEASE CLARIFY. IN THE WIKI ARTICLE FOR FIREBIRD, IT LISTS FIREBIRD'S MAX DAMAGE PER SECOND AS 840 HP PER SECOND. This is correct. However, it lists the max burning damage as 30 hp per half second. As we all know, the values for damage were recently multiplied by 10. This still reflects the old hp values, so it amounts to 6 (old value) hp of damage per second, which is pretty much nothing. However, many players have noticed that firebird's burning damage has been drastically decreased. Without the alteration it ceases to have a serious effect on gameplay. SO I want to knoW: Is this a typo, because it's the exact same number as the old value before everything was multiplied by ten? OR Was it intentional, and did the developers reduced the burn damage to 1/10th it's previous amount?

Lol I like this idea. What about a "asteroid impact" that disconnects everyone from the battle? :D

Those poor guys that don't have a delete button..

PLEASE CLARIFY. IN THE WIKI ARTICLE FOR FIREBIRD, IT LISTS FIREBIRD'S MAX DAMAGE PER SECOND AS 840 HP PER SECOND. This is correct. However, it lists the max burning damage as 30 hp per second. As we all know, the values for damage were recently multiplied by 10. This still reflects the old hp values, so it amounts to 3 hp of damage per second, which is nothing. However, many players have noticed that firebird's burning damage has been drastically decreased. Without the alteration it ceases to have a serious effect on gameplay. SO I want to knoW: Is this a typo, because it's the exact same number as the old value before everything was multiplied by ten? OR Was it intentional, and did the developers reduce the burn damage to 1/10th it's previous amount?