You think turrets are not balanced but ODs are? ?

They when you already have over 40k of them.

This never happened. Maybe Hunter OD disabled hornet OD - but I have my doubts since it won't disable viking OD. They have made Titan OD almost useless since there are 6 ODs that either ignore it or disable it. These days you basically save it to disable another Dome or to neutralize Wasp bomb. Pretty sad IMO.

LOL.

Activation delay seems like forever, eh? It's kinda dumb they implemented that.

Yeah, that's the second one I mentioned. It's not bad. Scope or Novel should replace Sandal in MM - Sandal is just too small. And... was playing a CP battle on Sandal where noob magnum was useless. A MAGNUM on the Sandal map - in CP - was useless. Next battle was gonna be stuck with noob again. No Thank You.

Maps won't load. Which one is Novel? The one with an underground passage and large walls? - was thinking of Scope - I like that one. Or is it the one with two main building areas and a long metal "walkway"?

Sorry - I read it wrong. That removal of slash is actually a benefit. No longer a danger to itself up close. The augment is way, way too powerful. They need to remove the snipe reload boost and also not allow splash damage from snipe to have EMP effects. Actually they should just add the splash back to arcade and remove splash entirely from the augment. You want splash? Use stock. You want EMP? You get no snipe splash.

You post dribble like this all the time. And you are wrong in each case.

Thought it was only snipe that has the EMP - "Sniped shots deactivate enemies' supplies for 5 seconds"

Just finished a Rugby battle on Chernobyl. Finished 2-0 for enemy team and only scorer was a Hopper-Gauss-EMP with Defender drone. That hull & turret augment are abominations that are ruining the game. Just gonna leave battles when I see those items.

Hornet + drone + not even trying to cap in CP. Player was doing TDM in a CP battle. Yeah, they can be deadly. But if put in danger they are not nearly as effective.

So... let's call the game hornet-hopper online? Since that is what everyone should be using? Hope your last comment is sarcasm... hard to tell.

Problem is, anything you apply to Pro-battles also applies to MM.

YUp - I loved Deathtrack and Skylark. Great maps with a bit of everything.

It's pretty sad when only 31% of those polled are happy with the game.

I agree with ThirdOnion. Having said that, could Isida use some improvement? Sure. Boost healing from 400/sec to 500/sec and give it a modest bump to scoring. Can't do much more without unbalancing ALL modes.

Well you didn't specify cyclone. And it needs a lock-on. It's a lot like shaft in that it's supposed to be a one-shot kill. Unless you have a module too. And Defender or Lifeguard. You have those drones - why you never bring them up? We all know Hornet OD is broken. So doesn't matter what improvements you want on Isida - won't make a diff. Stop refering that. It's silly.

Well... except for maybe Gauss-EMP. Does not need hornet OD to be too effective.

Seen that. Guy bragging how easy it was. Next battle fails on first attempt to grab the flag, complains about team, then quickly exists. These idiots look good on paper because they pad their stats.

You won't be saving anyone on those maps. They are designed for tank deaths. PERIOD. Any boost to Isida that will save someone on those maps will ruin the game everywhere else. You mean striker average damage of 7040 vs heavy hull health of 8000? And Shaft is designed as a one-shot kill turret. Go complain to Devs about that. Or wear a shaft module. No amount of healing will prevent a one-shot kill. You are asking for the "impossible". Yes Gauss splash damage is ridiculous. So is Gauss EMP. Lots of broken items in TO - I don't deny that. But then again - I've seen hornets with maxed out defender drone zip into bases and zip out with the flag as 3 enemies try to kill it and fail.

So ... what "holiday" is this?

They are not important at all - they are fringe maps - maps that specific groups like to play. Polygon Pro is way different from Polygon MM. And Noise - is so unbalanced it could never be adopted into MM. The maps you mention are smallish in size and promote lots of kills = higher battle fund. That's why players play them. And so Freeze and Twins and Fire and Magnum all do well because it's easy to inflict damage there. If you go into a battle on those maps you should have the expectation you will die often. If you don't like dying often then pick different maps.

Why do you need missions to have fun? Isn't playing in battles - battle-modes you choose - fun? Having more missions per week that give you supplies/crystals is a request to increase player income and that is a non-starter for TO. Besides - you can still collect stars via placement in non-mission battles which helps you progress further in Challenges which - coincidentally enough - gives you supplies or crystals.

We already have 3 new missions every 24 hrs. Are you saying you want to be able to have 3 + 3 (6) missions every day? That each gives rewards?