He/she didn't say continuously.

This complaint is missing from the list of complaints. Many times when I change a Deathmatch mission I get another Deathmatch. I think it's less with other battle modes but it happens too. When I get Deathmatch, Assault and sometimes Capture Point missions, I don't play.

I don't know, but my client is working good. Could be you computer, your connection, or something is wrong with your client. Try deleting AppData.

12 hours of play, then hopefully 8 hours of sleep, that leaves 4 hours for healthy eating, hygiene, exercise, sun exposure, room chores, some house chores, small game breaks... I think it's possible. Who are you to judge?!

I assume that racing game was not a team race. In team battles where players quit battles a voting option will not work. Even in DM ang Jug, how will Tanki add new players to battles to replace those players that have quit?

I just want to point out that many players don't care about paints, because they are only cosmetic and are useless in battles. And some of them, myself included, want to have as few paints as possible.

That means that no one will be sent to battles in progress because you can only join battles after voting and voting happens before battle starts. And we'll be fighting the most favored maps while those that vote for less favored maps will never get a chance to fight in them. With my idea you could even get the option to join battles in progress. Here the system will pick 3 maps and you'll have to decide within a certain amount of time. Quick Battle players and maybe Groups could go to fill battles that need players, like battles in progress, losing teams and less favored maps.

Next Challenge paints will be Magma at Tier 1 and Hive at Tier 10. Very good. Meanwhile I can't even earn 10 stars to get my Storm paint in this Challenge. (https://ratings.tankionline.com/en/user/Issimo)

Declined What if someone takes a long time to vote? What if there's a tie? Instead the system should just give us the option of a number of maps to go to. I think 3 should be the maps offered as options, then they can also tell us the rank bracket and approximate waiting time for each option. So, you click a button, the system looks for available battles being formed, then it gives you the options, you click the one you like and go. Quick Battles shouldn't have this option, and there should a time limit for choosing. PS: I'm just kidding with the Decline.

It's not you, it's the game. It's broken. Some of us were complaining even before the damaging updates, hoping that somehow devs would understand what they were doing was wrong. But they didn't listen or didn't care. We even complained in the Complaint Book, until they decided to move or remove complaint posts from there. Some changes can help, but just a little. And big changes would be really hard and maybe really damaging as well. And matchmaking will get worse and worse because there are fewer and fewer players. I'm posting this so we can start to accept reality. Meanwhile you can quit battles that are one sided and those where you're one of the lowest ranks.

We love the game so much that we spend more time in the forum.

The rank bracket seems to be 9 ranks wide. When there are fewer players in the system it's really bad. When you are one of the lower ranks, it's better to leave. And don't feel bad for leaving because it's actually better for the team you're leaving behind.

I played Isida in PRO battles with supplies off and it's weak compared to Fire and Freeze. I think many are using Isida because of healing points and because few use protection against it.

He's upset that others are using Isida too. PS: I don't know if everyone is using Isida or not. I only played 1 MM battle today.

Maybe we should ask the rest that question in a topic, if it's worth doing that or how should it be done if at all. I don't think many check this topic.

You can't massacre Massacre.

* for campers

I found 1 Gold Box mission... Why are most battles one sided?

Then how about having two topics per category? One that is for individual valid and completed ideas, easy for posters and maybe devs to browse. And another for discussion and whole topic mergings, including invalids and declineds. Example: Ideas for Assault and Ideas for Assault Discussion

Off topic: 3 currencies would be even better: 1 for equipments 1 for supplies (power ups) 1 for cosmetics (so instead of getting Storm paint we get a certain number of cosmetic currency units and we decide how to spend it)

That's what I said long ago. but devs don't seem to understand why it's really bad for the game, and it will get worse and worse as time goes by. There could have been other methods of them making those with full garage spend more without putting the game on track to it's demise.

I think he or she is saying that only the original post/idea should be merged to the category topic, and if that's the case I support the idea. And I think I have an easy way to do it: After few days of discussion and maybe changes to a new idea the poster should post a finalized idea in that topic which then that last post could be merged to the category topic, and the idea topic be archived. That would mean the category topic will have one idea in every post. And it would be better to rethink categories too. For example there should be "ideas for new battle modes" and "ideas for current battle modes" and maybe sub categories like "ideas for Assault mode".

May I open a topic titled "Ideas for Ideas and Suggestions"?

He should leave those battles. We shouldn't try to balance a broken game by trying harder and harder.