Just to clarify, your article needn't be based on Tanki. It can be anything, so long as it complies with the game rules and forum rules.

I would have done it sooner, but I didn't have much time.

You said that you had technical difficulties, so it's not fair to hold that against you.

Approved! I'll assume that the purpose of this interview wasn't to get to know Magenta, but rather to understand his relationship with the AWS. If that is correct, then I'd say you've done a pretty good job of it. The bits of humour were nice and refreshing every few sentences, while not being bitter and insult-like.

Approved! Honestly, this has to by far the best description of a bus trip with someone who you don't like. Don't take that offensively; I'm amazed by how you managed to take something so simple as a bus trip, and managed to turn it into this very well written narrative. I found no real mistakes (or I missed them).

Make it M4. Eventually, you get used to the difficulty of it.

Thrilled that Vulcan got a buff! I like the turret, but using it was virtually impossible because of the Magnums and OP Firebirds.

Approved! Certainly a somewhat humorous read and an interesting take on the disappearance of Godemode_ON. Due to the relative shortness and the creative nature of the article, I don't have much feedback except that there were some slightly misplaced commas and that I re-worded a sentence.

Approved! Particularly well written! I didn't see any mistakes, so if there are any please do let me know.

Interesting. I tend to struggle with these question types. So, how is it done?

Approved! Certainly an interesting read. It's good to see that someone's taking the initiative to write guides for lower level players. That being said, I noticed certain things which could be improved. Format: I found this to be a massive problem. I think it must have been the forum, but for whatever reason, your article was extremely broken up and separated. while I managed to fix the main content of your article, the supplies section was pretty much impossible to salvage due to how badly it became fragmented. Vocabulary: I felt that this was another issue that could be fixed. You used "Really", "but" and "Just" a lot. I would suggest using other words due to the fact that using these words again and again can make your article worse. Also, and I'm sure you are familiar with this, but "and" should not be at the start of a sentence. Formality: This is another thing that could use lots of work. While I managed to understand what it was you were attempting to say, the way it was presented was almost forum slanguage. Not in the whole "noob" and "XD" or ":P", but it was still difficult to interpret. Pictures: Pictures would be highly appreciated by readers and can really make your readers focus on your article. By eliminating them, you risk having readers not read your article. Sorry it took this long. Your article presents good information, but in a nutshell the presentation of it needs lots of work. That being said, welcome to the AWS!

Approved! Wonderfully written! While it is quite short in length, the excellent imagery more than made up for it. I didn't spot any grammar mistakes (probably because I was in a bit of a rush), so I assume that if I missed something I'll be promptly notified.

Approved! Well done! You have used imagery brilliantly. I, suffice to say, scrutinized it under a microscope but didn't notice anything that needed fixing.

Do you prefer Mathematics to Math? Or perhaps it is Maths you prefer.

Approved! Wonderful as usual. After a great deal of scrutinizing, I could not find anything that was blatantly wrong.

Not required, I just want to know if there is another way. I made up the question too, just to express that I mean to try to understand complicated polynomials.

Thanks! I know that Freeze is (or was) overpowered. The reason that Firebird made it but Freeze didn't is that Freeze users are unlikely to be able to take down a Juggernaut. The thing is that Freeze protections on the Juggernaut and Juggernaut's overdrive will render it useless. This means that basically, you just end up wasting your whole charge to weaken and slow down the Juggernaut for others to kill. Granted, the same arguments can be made for Firebird, but Firebird deals after-burn damage which means that even if you end up flipped you still have a chance of killing the Juggernaut, no matter how small.

Not entirely. I left out Freeze as it requires much greater difficulty than Firebird, although the results can be better.

I realize this idea seems counter productive, but I found this to be a problem. Due to naming pro battles, I cannot find a Noise CTF, for example, without looking through lots of matches. I think that tanki should add a small sign beside the battle for this. For example, if I play a Sandbox Xp, and call it "Crazy fun". It ahows up as "(SB Xp) Crazy fun" where the SB stands for sandbox.

I didn't add in Hammer because of the delay between shots. It's quite rare to find a Juggernaut which is just by itself, and since that is the case, using Hammer means that timing is of extreme importance. Shaft is similar in that respect (in fact better as it does well over 3000 more damage with DD at M4, which doesn't factor in the "heavy capacitors" alteration). Also, you have to be closer with Hammer which always ends up being more dangerous against Juggernauts. Thanks for pointing that out! I didn't try to go too in-depth with the history because I felt that It'd be best if I focused on how to become/be the Juggernaut.

Don't; While this piece is very well written, it would hardly be your style, which (in my opinion) is what you should master.

I figured someone might say that. Nevertheless, I don't intend to go anywhere near Maze Runner.

Could you give me an example of what you mean? Edit: I think I may have misspoken. I do understand what a reciprocal is, but just not what kind of equation you refer to.

Approved! Well done upon making your article have significantly less mistakes. If memory serves, I caught about three or so, which were generally words in the wrong context. I quite liked the imagery too.

Reciprocals? Correct me if I'm wrong, but do you mean with equations like "1 + (1/x) = 0"? I'd say working these kind of solutions is somewhat easy. The one that I'm worried about is " x4 + 27x3 + 17x2 + 115x + 910" where I don't understand what to do. Naturally, the factor theorem is not going to be of much help.