Nives doesn't have the time or desire to do voice-over for the V-log, so your vote won't make a difference in that sense. As awesome and cool as he is, it would be quite difficult for players to understand his accent, especially if English is not their first language. If you don't like the new narrator (it's me, by the way :P), then don't worry - Alex Lynch, the normal narrator, will be back to voice the V-log in the next episode. Please discuss the V-log in the corresponding topic. Closed.

Actually no. The servers are located in the Netherlands, so in Russia I was getting 60-80 ping even with good internet. I live in the UK now and I get around 12 ping on average.

I'm very sceptical that any modern army would officially encourage friendly fire against cowards or deserters. It happened in WW2, sure. But I'm pretty sure nowadays it's banned.

Those behind you? Your own friendly soldiers? What kind of barbaric army is that?

Only if the record is at least 90% of the 10-minute value, which yours isn't. Sounds too specific, but we'll think about it.

Sorry, you need to think of another solution. Adding a feature that specifically encourages players to kill their teammates goes against all logic. There are plenty of more neutral solutions, such as making the player take fire damage if they hold the flag for too long, or making them take damage if they stay too close to the base with the flag.

Under review Valid I changed your original idea of enabling friendly fire on the flag holder to simply making them automatically drop the flag. It's a much more effective and team-friendly solution.

Wow, Hexed farming up a collection of "hub" topics in News section. Hmm

I have no life (liek dis if u cri evrytim)

Valid

We had this in I&S a couple years ago and it was a complete mess. Pointless topics would be posted every day and it was very difficult to deal with them. Ever since the I&S section was changed, everything became a lot more organised. I know that it's inconvenient to have to wait for your topics to get approved, but we're doing our best to do it as soon as we can.

Exactly. Imagine a Wasp with invincibility and insta-kill driving into the enemy base and killing everyone within seconds.

I never said that I like or support the idea of tying ovedrives to specific hulls, I just explained developers' logic behind it.

Topic merged I strongly recommend that you read the guide for posting ideas, since it explains exactly what the tags mean and what you should expect to happen to your topic after you posted it. You seem to misunderstand the meaning of "Under review", or perhaps it is my fault for not choosing more suitable wording. Basically, "under review" simply means that the idea is valid and developers may eventually look into it and implement it. However, there is no guarantee that it will be implemented, but at the same time I can't decline it if it makes sense and has a chance for implementation. I mean, we still occasionally get ideas from a few years ago getting implemented in new updates. Unfortunately developers simply don't have time to read, discuss and give a definitive answer for every single valid idea topic, so it's impossible to have an evaluation of every single valid topic. That being said, your post got me thinking that we should change the "under review" tag to something like "valid", which would have the same meaning, but would be less misleading. In turn, "under review" would mean that the idea's status is undecided and it's awaiting a decision. I'll discuss this with my team.

Well, the whole purpose of ODs is to make each hull's gameplay more unique, so that's the only reason they are tied to the hulls. Not the best strategy, I agree. But I guess it will work...

This record has been archived because it reached the limit (1).

July 2011 - Paused for a while in 2015 and in mid-2016, but I play actively now.

-675

Topic merged The JGR icon is already in the list of PRO battle filters, so I can only assume that it's already planned to add the game mode.

Under review So I actually talked to tech support about this and it seems like they aren't planning to fix it. You see, buying items for others and giving someone else your payment link is actually against the rules, so it's technically your own fault that you put yourself into this situation. It infuriates me that they don't want to fix such a blatant error in the system (an error that literally lets anyone block their enemies' accounts with a simple trick), but what can we do. I mean seriously, all it takes is implementing this idea to make buying gifts official and safe. (╯°□°)╯︵┻━┻

Under review Planned There's no need to have a new setting for this. I declined a very similar idea previously because ability to kick players could be easily abused by the creator to gain easy battle funds, but that is no longer a problem since funds and EXP are disabled in private battles. So by default it would make perfect sense of the battle creator had this ability in private battles. That being said, this won't be added to public PRO battles to prevent abuse.

Me .__. Although my case is somewhat different since I live/study abroad and my grandparents are in Russia, so it's nice to go see them for a few months a year because they miss me. Also they need help in their countryside cottage where they go during summer months. Also also, living in Dubai during summer is hell, so it's nice to go into the much more pleasant Russian climate. I do bring my laptop most of the time though.

Topic merged

This idea is definitely more on the ridiculous side. More importantly, a lot of these game modes are just the existing game modes with a twist, since they don't actually add any new mechanics to the game (unlike Rugby or Juggernaut when they were added) - they just slightly change the gameplay of the existing mode. Another important factor is that of you want these to be added as separate game modes in MM battles - they will only increase the waiting times for the battles due to players being more spread out across game modes. And if you want these to be added to PRO battles only - OK, but it's unlikely that devs will be making any more PRO-exclusive content at this point.

I wouldn't go as far as calling it a scam. Just simple clickbait/lie. It's your choice whether or not you want to believe them and waste your time going to the battle. After all, even if they did lie, the only thing you lose is a few minutes from joining and leaving the battle.